burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 lol Stroman is still the 3rd best starter on the team. 3.76 FIP
204Jays Verified Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 What's the prediction for tomorrow? If he continues the same approach, then.. 5.2 IP, 8 H, 5 ER, 2 K, 2 BB Buy a lottery ticket tonight!
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 I think its just Boston and their babip voodoo
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 I wouldn't mind a Hutch cameo during this upcoming stretch of games without an off day. It would give the guys an extra day and add an extra bit of competition.
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 I would not be shocked if they optioned him to the minors. Hes been very bad.
Jayday Verified Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 \\Ricky Romero 2.0 Yup, he's emotional , not quite like romero but he needs to keep his composure . Young dumb and full of cum .
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 I wouldn't mind a Hutch cameo during this upcoming stretch of games without an off day. It would give the guys an extra day and add an extra bit of competition. Atkins already mentioned this the other day. So very likely.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 lol Stroman is still the 3rd best starter on the team. 3.76 FIP And with each and every start I'm guessing he's slipping a little further and futher back.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 \\ Yup, he's emotional , not quite like romero but he needs to keep his composure . Young dumb and full of cum . So rub one out before taking the mound?
Jayday Verified Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 So rub one out before taking the mound? Yeah, it could help, after all, unlike Romero, he doesn't have miss america for a girlfriend.
Cyborg Verified Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 Anyone want to explain why Gibby didnt walk Ortiz there? Because that would be dumb.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 Because that would be dumb. No... Guys on 2nd and 3rd, 2 outs, Ortiz is a LHH, next batter is a RHH... It made a lot of sense to walk Ortiz in that situation.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 Stroman has a 3.73 FIP and a 3.87 xFIP. He's not pitching THAT bad and any talk of demoting him to the minors is stupid.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 No... Guys on 2nd and 3rd, 2 outs, Ortiz is a LHH, next batter is a RHH... It made a lot of sense to walk Ortiz in that situation. Dunno. If Stroman can't get Ortiz then he has serious problems. Which is not to take away from Ortiz, but more that a major league starter should be able to make a single out when necessary. Hanley could have shot one over the monster for four runs vs. what Ortiz did. I mean, that's not what happened, but that's hindsight.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 Dunno. If Stroman can't get Ortiz then he has serious problems. Which is not to take away from Ortiz, but more that a major league starter should be able to make a single out when necessary. Hanley could have shot one over the monster for four runs vs. what Ortiz did. I mean, that's not what happened, but that's hindsight. It has to do with the better matchup against Hanley and the fact that there is a base open at 1st... No hindsight involved. Even Pat and Buck were calling for Stroman to walk Ortiz. Baseball is a game of matchups. It was dumb to pitch to Ortiz in that situation. Likely Stroman's ego that kept him from walking Ortiz.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 I know it's the better matchup but picking the matchup you like isn't cost-free. It involves putting another chip on the pile with 2 outs. I don't think that's worth it. So many more ways a run can score with the bases juiced, too. BBs, HBPs, and the like. It's a distinctly worse scenario.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 I know it's the better matchup but picking the matchup you like isn't cost-free. It involves putting another chip on the pile with 2 outs. I don't think that's worth it. You're neglecting to mention the fact that Ortiz is probably the best hitter on the team and a LHH, while Hanley is a righty.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 You're neglecting to mention the fact that Ortiz is probably the best hitter on the team and a LHH, while Hanley is a righty. I'm not neglecting anything. I agreed it's the better matchup. I'm saying that I don't think the better matchup is worth tightening the vice like that. I might agree with you if Ryan Hanigan was after Ortiz, but Hanley is not a slouch either.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 I'm not neglecting anything. I agreed it's the better matchup. I'm saying that I don't think the better matchup is worth tightening the vice like that. How is it "tightening the vice"? 1st base was open anyways, and Ortiz won't score on a double. The only way it would be worse is if Hanley hit a homer, which he hasn't hit many of this season.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 How is it "tightening the vice"? 1st base was open anyways, and Ortiz won't score on a double. The only way it would be worse is if Hanley hit a homer, which he hasn't hit many of this season. There's no such thing as "open". Putting a guy on because a base is "open" just means putting a potential run there. It also means Stroman doesn't have the leeway of a BB. The more guys that are on, the more damage that can be done, including the more ways. And yeah, maybe Ortiz doesn't score on a double. But that just means you're back at 2nd/3rd with 2 outs, but now down by two more runs. You can't just say Ramirez is the better matchup (which I agree it is) without acknowledging how much more trouble you need to put yourself in to get to him.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 There's no such thing as "open". Putting a guy on because a base is "open" just means putting a potential run there. It also means Stroman doesn't have the leeway of a BB. The more guys that are on, the more damage that can be done, including the more ways. And yeah, maybe Ortiz doesn't score on a double. But that just means you're back at 2nd/3rd with 2 outs, but now down by two more runs. You can't just say Ramirez is the better matchup (which I agree it is) without acknowledging how much more trouble you need to put yourself in to get to him. Putting Ortiz on 1st also gives you the force out at any base.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 Putting Ortiz on 1st also gives you the force out at any base. Force scenarios work both ways. A walk or HBP become an instant run. Ortiz also runs like a turtle, and Hanley isn't much better. It's not like you have to worry about catching Kiermeier. You shouldn't need a force play to make an out on either of those guys. If you can't throw out Ortiz or Hanley at first then there's an extremely good chance that Betts, Pedroia, or Bogaerts are already safe at the next base. Maybe Ortiz takes too long to get to second on a groundball, but now you're planning for a really specific scenario that you can't really control.
TheGrandslamMan Verified Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 Oh my god. Are you guys for real? Stroman getting sent down??? Stromans a perfectly valuable starter in the 3/4 role. Is he the ace that Rogers hyped him to be? No... But he's a useful young arm that should be able to give us competitive innings. The kids still learning for crying out loud. If we really want to put our faith in a lights out starter then Aaron Sanchez is our man.. Way more natural talent than the Stroshow... Dickey/Happ provide the 2/3 spot and Stroshow/Estrada fill out the back of the rotation.
Stoneyen Verified Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 There's no such thing as "open". Putting a guy on because a base is "open" just means putting a potential run there. It also means Stroman doesn't have the leeway of a BB. The more guys that are on, the more damage that can be done, including the more ways. And yeah, maybe Ortiz doesn't score on a double. But that just means you're back at 2nd/3rd with 2 outs, but now down by two more runs. You can't just say Ramirez is the better matchup (which I agree it is) without acknowledging how much more trouble you need to put yourself in to get to him. It is better to put on a runner when first base is "open" in that it doesn't advance the lead runner, but in this case it also creates a situation where a walk to the following batter would advance the lead runner (and bring in a run). Considering the matchups its probably pretty close either way.
Slot Machine Verified Member Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 Personally I'd be walking the guy with a 203 wrc+ in that situation.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now