Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

How good will Francis be moving forward?  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. How good will Francis be moving forward?



Recommended Posts

Posted
Where's your vote?

 

I was going to vote #4 but I didn't want to be associated with Jim so I'm going with #3.

 

I'm a little bullish on him anyway. The change in pitch mix has given him a true talent change. The curve had great movement but it was a slow breaker that hitters could see from a mile away and lead to major home run problems for him.

 

This fastball/split combo gives off Gausman vibes and I think he can remain effective with it. The curve and slider are solid 3rd and 4th pitches for him.

Posted
Hopefully a solid 5. He doesn't have the velo or the stuff for 1-3. Hope he proves me wrong and turns into tor starter.
Community Moderator
Posted

He's interesting

The stuff+ over the last month is actually pretty middling, like 94 stuff+

But the splitter effectively makes him a wide arsenal pitcher who is 50% FB, 25% splitter, 15% slider 10% curveball or something like that

It's also not super common for a SP to throw a splitter that much

Since July 28th here are the SP who have thrown a splitter 20%+ of the time:

Gausman 35% Imanaga 32% Eovaldi 32% Francis 26% Houck 22% Mitchell Parker 21% (Bryce Miller 15% is next).

Six guys.

Comp to sliders, you get 19 guys and then a bunch more who are barely below 20%

 

AND we kind of know that stuff+ sucks with changeups and splitters. e.g. it has Gausman and Imanaga's splitters as 90 and 80 pitches this year. Both of those are thrown a lot and have positive run values, so that just doesn't make sense.

 

So if you make some assumptions:

- more pitches is better

- the splitter is a weapon despite what stuff+ says

- he has good command

 

Then I think he could be pretty damn good as a wide arsenal guy with good command and enough tricks up his sleeve. Some guys in that bucket are:

- Zach Eflin (he might have 5+ pitches though)

- Erick Fedde (cutter, sinker, slider, change)

- Michael King (four seamer, sinker, slider, change)

- Seth Lugo (four seamer, sinker, slider, curveball, plus three other show-me pitches)

- This late career version of Nathan Eovaldi

 

^ all of the above are good 2024 SP with qualified innings but below average overall stuff+

 

I guess at the end of the day it could just be the classic baseball developmental touched-by-god leap of "man finds changeup"

 

 

The thing we don't really know yet is if he actually has good command. If it comes and goes, he won't be as good as the above. And if the splitter isn't as good as it has seemed recently and hitters catch onto it, then he slides down the spectrum.

Posted
I was going to vote #4 but I didn't want to be associated with Jim so I'm going with #3.

 

I'm a little bullish on him anyway. The change in pitch mix has given him a true talent change. The curve had great movement but it was a slow breaker that hitters could see from a mile away and lead to major home run problems for him.

 

This fastball/split combo gives off Gausman vibes and I think he can remain effective with it. The curve and slider are solid 3rd and 4th pitches for him.

 

He's bringing me a mid guy vibe with how this is rolling, he's been sublime since he's been recalled. Must be a tweak, it's been shocking.

Posted
He's interesting

The stuff+ over the last month is actually pretty middling, like 94 stuff+

But the splitter effectively makes him a wide arsenal pitcher who is 50% FB, 25% splitter, 15% slider 10% curveball or something like that

It's also not super common for a SP to throw a splitter that much

Since July 28th here are the SP who have thrown a splitter 20%+ of the time:

Gausman 35% Imanaga 32% Eovaldi 32% Francis 26% Houck 22% Mitchell Parker 21% (Bryce Miller 15% is next).

Six guys.

Comp to sliders, you get 19 guys and then a bunch more who are barely below 20%

 

AND we kind of know that stuff+ sucks with changeups and splitters. e.g. it has Gausman and Imanaga's splitters as 90 and 80 pitches this year. Both of those are thrown a lot and have positive run values, so that just doesn't make sense.

 

So if you make some assumptions:

- more pitches is better

- the splitter is a weapon despite what stuff+ says

- he has good command

 

Then I think he could be pretty damn good as a wide arsenal guy with good command and enough tricks up his sleeve. Some guys in that bucket are:

- Zach Eflin (he might have 5+ pitches though)

- Erick Fedde (cutter, sinker, slider, change)

- Michael King (four seamer, sinker, slider, change)

- Seth Lugo (four seamer, sinker, slider, curveball, plus three other show-me pitches)

- This late career version of Nathan Eovaldi

 

^ all of the above are good 2024 SP with qualified innings but below average overall stuff+

 

I guess at the end of the day it could just be the classic baseball developmental touched-by-god leap of "man finds changeup"

 

 

The thing we don't really know yet is if he actually has good command. If it comes and goes, he won't be as good as the above. And if the splitter isn't as good as it has seemed recently and hitters catch onto it, then he slides down the spectrum.

 

All good. Now what's your vote?

Posted
Hopefully a solid 5. He doesn't have the velo or the stuff for 1-3. Hope he proves me wrong and turns into tor starter.

 

This is basically why I voted a 4, kind of always thought he'd be a 4 when I dove into more detail. After Laika was peeping his horn.

Posted
He's bringing me a mid guy vibe with how this is rolling, he's been sublime since he's been recalled. Must be a tweak, it's been shocking.

 

Much more than just a tweak. He has basically dumped his curveball now and is all in on a sinker. I guess Gausman had a big brother to little brother talk with him about the effectiveness of the splitter. Whatever works for him, just keep 'er going I guess.

Posted
He's interesting

The stuff+ over the last month is actually pretty middling, like 94 stuff+

But the splitter effectively makes him a wide arsenal pitcher who is 50% FB, 25% splitter, 15% slider 10% curveball or something like that

It's also not super common for a SP to throw a splitter that much

Since July 28th here are the SP who have thrown a splitter 20%+ of the time:

Gausman 35% Imanaga 32% Eovaldi 32% Francis 26% Houck 22% Mitchell Parker 21% (Bryce Miller 15% is next).

Six guys.

Comp to sliders, you get 19 guys and then a bunch more who are barely below 20%

 

AND we kind of know that stuff+ sucks with changeups and splitters. e.g. it has Gausman and Imanaga's splitters as 90 and 80 pitches this year. Both of those are thrown a lot and have positive run values, so that just doesn't make sense.

 

So if you make some assumptions:

- more pitches is better

- the splitter is a weapon despite what stuff+ says

- he has good command

 

Then I think he could be pretty damn good as a wide arsenal guy with good command and enough tricks up his sleeve. Some guys in that bucket are:

- Zach Eflin (he might have 5+ pitches though)

- Erick Fedde (cutter, sinker, slider, change)

- Michael King (four seamer, sinker, slider, change)

- Seth Lugo (four seamer, sinker, slider, curveball, plus three other show-me pitches)

- This late career version of Nathan Eovaldi

 

^ all of the above are good 2024 SP with qualified innings but below average overall stuff+

 

I guess at the end of the day it could just be the classic baseball developmental touched-by-god leap of "man finds changeup"

 

 

The thing we don't really know yet is if he actually has good command. If it comes and goes, he won't be as good as the above. And if the splitter isn't as good as it has seemed recently and hitters catch onto it, then he slides down the spectrum.

 

The Gasman taught him his splitter grip, he's been gravy since he started using it in game, hah.

Posted
Much more than just a tweak. He has basically dumped his curveball now and is all in on a sinker. I guess Gausman had a big brother to little brother talk with him about the effectiveness of the sinker. Whatever works for him, just keep 'er going I guess.

 

Yeah, I read that bit as well, lol. Crazy how it works, sometimes.

Community Moderator
Posted
All good. Now what's your vote?

 

There was no TJS option so I am abstaining...

 

Probably SP4 is the highest I can go right now. Sample too small, novelty can be a big factor, fastball velo remains fringe.

Posted
Much more than just a tweak. He has basically dumped his curveball now and is all in on a sinker. I guess Gausman had a big brother to little brother talk with him about the effectiveness of the splitter. Whatever works for him, just keep 'er going I guess.

 

That's the crazy part. His curve was nasty. Huge 12-6 drop on it.

Posted

 

This is a completely cherry picked stat and it is a SSS. But it does highlight the point that he hasn't just had a good streak, he has been COMPLETELY dominant.

 

If he was putting up a run of decent quality starts or I would be hesitant to say he can be anything better than a #4. But this is another level. So a #4 is probably the best bet, there is potential he could be far better.

 

And just think, we got this guy for Rowdy Tellez!

Posted
Extend Atkins for the Francis trade alone. This is becoming a Yordan for Fields or a Tatis for Shields type, franchise altering trade.
Posted
This level of performance is obviously unsustainable but the fact that he is even capable of it suggests to me he could be an above average starter.
Posted
There was no TJS option so I am abstaining...

 

Probably SP4 is the highest I can go right now. Sample too small, novelty can be a big factor, fastball velo remains fringe.

 

kid-finger-wag.gif

Posted
I am still thrilled with him as a Swingman but expanding his arsenal is clearly seeing him blossom. He’s certainly atleast starting next Season in the rotation if he’s healthy.
Posted
Barring injury, I think #4/5 starter is most realistic, and that would still be found money for the team. Anything above that would be amazing, though less likely.
Posted
Barring injury, I think #4/5 starter is most realistic, and that would still be found money for the team. Anything above that would be amazing, though less likely.

 

Before answering the following should be provided

 

Stats for Josh Towers best 30 inning run in 2005 with his k-rate normalized to 2024 k rates.

Posted
Before answering the following should be provided

 

Stats for Josh Towers best 30 inning run in 2005 with his k-rate normalized to 2024 k rates.

 

Looking at month by month Towers did not have anything too spectacular in 2005. Best was like 45 innings 22 ks 2.4 ERA... so probably Josh Towers never had a 30 inning run like this...

 

Who did? Alek Manoah probably had some pretty good 30 inning runs... of course Alek Manoah had some pretty goot 250 inning runs and that didn't last either.

 

He's 4 years older but this run, if he finishes it off will be very similar to Halladay's 2001.

Posted

Buck Martinez compared Bowden to Jim Clancy and that is the exact guy I was thinking of when I saw him pitch - he is a tall guy with an over-the-top delivery.

 

From what I see - his repertoire looks fairly pedestrian BUT his splitter looks odd to me like some weird Knuckle-Split or something - it sort of flutters up there. Whatever it is it looks different from what everyone else throws and maybe that's the key to his success.

 

I would not get too excited yet because I am old enough to remember Mark Eichorn who was a 7 WAR reliever (yes reliever) for us because he was throwing "something no one else did" and the league couldn't figure him out for like 2 years - then they did.

 

Granted Francis throws a lot harder but let's see how he does - hopefully, we finally get a bit of luck and find a diamond.

 

Here is a terrific stats-laden video on just how ridiculous Mark Eichhorn was and a reminder to folks not to get too excited over 4-5 starts.

 

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...