Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
1. Henderson

2. Dimmagio

3. Bonds

4. Ruth

5. Aaron

6. Williams

7. Griffey Jr

8. Gehrig

9. Trout

 

Bench: Musial, Cobb, Thomas (pinch hitter only), Mays (defensive replacement only)

 

Wat

 

Willie Mays is a starter without a doubt. 3rd in career WAR...

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
1. Henderson

2. Dimmagio

3. Bonds

4. Ruth

5. Aaron

6. Williams

7. Griffey Jr

8. Gehrig

9. Trout

 

Bench: Musial, Cobb, Thomas (pinch hitter only), Mays (defensive replacement only)

 

Nice lineup but Mantle over Thomas on your bench. Also Miggy on the bench too. He'll go down as an all time great.

Posted
U trolling us, bro?

 

Nobody thinks he was. In his prime though, he wasn't much different than Mike Trout. Definitely not overrated...

 

The fans always compared Bonds and Griffey, but.................. Bonds was in another level.

Posted
Wat

 

Willie Mays is a starter without a doubt. 3rd in career WAR...

 

lol Willie Mays is arguably the greatest player of all time. I know people will say Ruth this and Ruth that, Wille Mays actually competed against athletes, not drunken slobs

Posted
The fans always compared Bonds and Griffey, but.................. Bonds was in another level.

 

He was hall of fame calibre before roids, after roids he became greatest ever.

 

How good would griffey have been if he took same stuff as Barry? Griffey had better early career numbers...

Old-Timey Member
Posted
lol Willie Mays is arguably the greatest player of all time. I know people will say Ruth this and Ruth that, Wille Mays actually competed against athletes, not drunken slobs

 

don't talk about Hurl that way

 

Anyone who says Griffey isn't one of the best can fysmc

Posted
U trolling us, bro?

 

He was hall of fame calibre before roids, after roids he became greatest ever.

 

How good would griffey have been if he took same stuff as Barry? Griffey had better early career numbers...

 

Best 5 season before 1999 fWAR

Griffey (9.7, 9, 8.4, 6.9, 6.6) = 8.1 fWAR avg

Bonds (10.5, 9.9, 9.6, 9.2, 8.9) = 9.6 fWAR avg

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Catcher hasn't had as much premium talent as other positions. Probably has to be Bench or Piazza though. Maybe in a decade and change it'll be Posey :)
Posted
Griffey averaged 6 WAR for like a decade in his prime, with a couple 9s mixed in there. Unless you're calling him the greatest player of his generation, you're not overrating him.
Posted
Catcher hasn't had as much premium talent as other positions. Probably has to be Bench or Piazza though. Maybe in a decade and change it'll be Posey :)

 

Or Mike Trout.

 

oWAR 10 - dWAR 3 = 7 fWAR

Posted
Griffey averaged 6 WAR for like a decade in his prime, with a couple 9s mixed in there. Unless you're calling him the greatest player of his generation, you're not overrating him.

 

Is it fair compare him to Bonds?

Posted
He was hall of fame calibre before roids, after roids he became greatest ever.

 

How good would griffey have been if he took same stuff as Barry? Griffey had better early career numbers...

 

How do you know he didn't?

Posted
Griffey averaged 6 WAR for like a decade in his prime, with a couple 9s mixed in there. Unless you're calling him the greatest player of his generation, you're not overrating him.

 

People argue he's right up there with Willie Mays

Posted
Why are there so many outfielders in this lineup? Gotta get guys like Honus Wagner and A-Rod in there.

 

Miggy probably doesn't make the team off the bench. Not a better hitter than guys like Jimmie Foxx, Mark McGwire, Tris Speaker.

 

At this point its pretty obvious he's a better player then McGwire

Posted
Catcher hasn't had as much premium talent as other positions. Probably has to be Bench or Piazza though. Maybe in a decade and change it'll be Posey :)

 

That's a really great point. If you were to go by fangraphs WAR, Jason Kendall is a top 25 catcher of all time!

Posted
At this point its pretty obvious he's a better player then McGwire

 

It's arguable, Miggy has a slightly lower career wRC+. At their best McGwire is probably the better hitter, with a lot more power.

Posted
That's a really great point. If you were to go by fangraphs WAR, Jason Kendall is a top 25 catcher of all time!

 

Is that a surprise to you? Kendall was truly a unique player

Posted
It's arguable, Miggy has a slightly lower career wRC+. At their best McGwire is probably the better hitter, with a lot more power.

 

wRC+ takes into account run environment correct?

Posted
wRC+ takes into account run environment correct?

 

Yes, it's park and league adjusted, so even if the offensive environment was more prevalent in McGwire's era, he was still that much better than league average.

Posted
At his best McGwire hit 70 dingers while walking in nearly a quarter of his plate appearances. Take a seat, Miggy.

 

Excellent point

Posted
Is that a surprise to you? Kendall was truly a unique player

 

It is a surprise. When you think of hall of fame catchers, not too many guys come to mind. I never realized that.

Community Moderator
Posted
It is a surprise. When you think of hall of fame catchers, not too many guys come to mind. I never realized that.

 

super hard to have a long and productive career behind the dish!

 

s***, Brian McCann is the 32nd best C in history. Russell Martin is 34th! They are both better ranked as catchers than Delgado and Giambi rank as 1B (and they still have plenty of time to add WAR).

 

Really when you compare careers with WAR, you sort of have to give catchers another positional adjustment... maybe. arguably.

Posted
It is a surprise. When you think of hall of fame catchers, not too many guys come to mind. I never realized that.

 

lived in the shadow of Piazza, Posada and Varitek

Posted
Best 5 season before 1999 fWAR

Griffey (9.7, 9, 8.4, 6.9, 6.6) = 8.1 fWAR avg

Bonds (10.5, 9.9, 9.6, 9.2, 8.9) = 9.6 fWAR avg

 

They didnt both start in the same year so don't just pick 1999, it gives more Bonds seasons to cherry pick from.

 

Either way I'm not debating you on Bonds being better. You're the one saying Griffey doesn't even come close which is just ridiculous. We are talking about the 2 greatest OF of the 80's/90's.

 

They were both unbelievable. Bonds was a bit better.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...