Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
SIGNSIGNSIGNSIGN

 

Signing him would give us one pretty decent draft imo.

 

Would be a big win the for Jays if we got him. We already have 900k+ available to sign him if they want to (considering they don't go overslot on anybody and if they actually prefer him to the other three big picks after the first 10 rounds)

  • Replies 731
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Would be a big win the for Jays if we got him. We already have 900k+ available to sign him if they want to (considering they don't go overslot on anybody and if they actually prefer him to the other three big picks after the first 10 rounds)

 

When the Jays don't sign a pick it lowers the draft budget, the 5% overage allowance is calculated based on the budget. Therefore the amount available from the 5% does rely on getting Bickford and Hollon signed. Right now $~$210k of the possible ~$320k overage is tied to Hollon and Bickford's budget space.

Posted
When the Jays don't sign a pick it lowers the draft budget, the 5% overage allowance is calculated based on the budget. Therefore the amount available from the 5% does rely on getting Bickford and Hollon signed. Right now $~$210k of the possible ~$320k overage is tied to Hollon and Bickford's budget space.

 

I think Hollon is a lock to sign, don't really care if we lost Bickford but I would also be for them signing him.

Posted
So if we don't sign our pick like Bickford, we can't use his slot money to pay for other draftees? I thought that plan was to not sign Bickford, get an extra pick next year, and use the money this year to buy high ceiling guys who slipped through the draft.
Posted

So the only way to "play" the system is take people higher than they should and sign him for lower and then have extra money for lower guys with high ceiling.

Then again, it doesn't really give you anything since it might make more sense to actually get the best guys and pay them slot value and be done with it, chances are the lower guys won't make it anyway.

Verified Member
Posted

But if you sign enough shittier players like after round 10 and sign them for a hot dog or $1K,

you can hopefully accumulate enough "extra" cash to go after really solid prospects that slid

down the draft because their demands were too great/injury/etc.

eg. Smoral from last year's draft.

Posted

You only get money for the first 10 rounds though and if you pay anyone from round 11+ more than 100k, it goes from your pool. So the only way you can pull it off is if you sign people from first 10 rounds to below slot value.

If it was possible to offer players up to 500k, they would be more likely to sign than go to college. Those that are already at college will probably sign because they know if at college they were drafted so low, it won't be any better next year.

Posted (edited)

 

 

fap fap fap

Edited by Angrioter
Posted

Jim Callis @jimcallisBA

 

At least one, maybe both if plans work out. @Mikeleelop: any chance #BlueJays can pull together $ to sign Tellez and/or Brentz?? #mlbdraft

 

 

10:48 AM - 02 Jul 13

 

 

 

 

________________________________________

 

 

Reply to @jimcallisBA

 

 

Retweet

Favorite

Posted
Jim Callis @jimcallisBA

 

At least one, maybe both if plans work out. @Mikeleelop: any chance #BlueJays can pull together $ to sign Tellez and/or Brentz?? #mlbdraft

 

 

10:48 AM - 02 Jul 13

 

 

 

 

________________________________________

 

 

Reply to @jimcallisBA

 

 

Retweet

Favorite

 

This is the way

[tweet ]twitt number[ /tweet]

 

without space

Verified Member
Posted

 

 

fap fap fap

 

wow. sounds fairly confident.

Posted

 

Sounds like they gave him a really low offer so when he realizes he's the only who didn't sign yet, he will accept the low offer.

Posted

This is depressing.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/07/rays-sign-first-rounder-ryne-stanek.html

 

The Rays have signed first-round pick Ryne Stanek for the full assigned pick value of $1,758,300, according to Jim Callis of Baseball America (on Twitter). The Rays, who have confirmed the signing via press release, received the No. 29 overall selection as compensation for the loss of B.J. Upton to the Braves in free agency. Stanek is advised by Jason Wood of Arland Sports.

 

Stanek entered the season as a potential Top 5 pick, but his stock fell due to inconsistency througout the year. Still, MLB.com's Jonathan Mayo ranked Stanek as the No. 12 prospect in this year's draft, while Baseball America and ESPN's Keith Law each had him ranked 13th. Stanek slipped well past his expectations, and many considered the Rays' selection of Stanek to be one of the best values in the first round.

 

Mayo writes that Stanek "has as much arm strength as anyone, throwing a plus fastball in the mid-90s while maintaining velocity throughout his starts." Law feels that Stanek's curveball is ahead of his slider, though BA notes that his slider "has real power in the 84-87 mph range when it's right."

 

So the Rays sign a guy who was projected to be a top 5 pick before the season, with the potential upside of a #1 or 2 starter, who throws in the upper 90s with a plus breaking ball, and a Boras client no less for only 1.7mm. While our first round pick, who wasn't even on the radar to start the year, got slightly over-drafted, has no breaking pitch, is asking for 3.9mm? WTF!

Posted
This is depressing.

 

 

So the Rays sign a guy who was projected to be a top 5 pick before the season, with the potential upside of a #1 or 2 starter, who throws in the upper 90s with a plus breaking ball, and a Boras client no less for only 1.7mm. While our first round pick, who wasn't even on the radar to start the year, got slightly over-drafted, has no breaking pitch, is asking for 3.9mm? WTF!

 

I didn't have Stanek as a 1st rounder by the time the draft hit. The velocity is electric and the breaking stuff is decent but, I hate his delivery and feel he will either be a reliever or hurt his entire career. Way happier with Bickford.

Posted
This is the way

[tweet ]twitt number[ /tweet]

 

without space

Where do you project Brenden Kalfus (recent draft pick) to be next season? He is a all-around athlete that hits from both sides of the plate, won the batting title this year in D-1 for the West Coast Conference and has garnished several awards in college. 4 tool player (power still to come) with a great bat, great glove and speed, and an accurate strong arm (already has 4 outfield assists from right field!). Many of us who have seen him in Vancouver believe he is going to be with the Blue Jays soon. He looks confident and his approach to the plate (and how he runs to his position) is legit! Kalfus simply performs and impacts the game.

Posted
Where do you project Brenden Kalfus (recent draft pick) to be next season? He is a all-around athlete that hits from both sides of the plate, won the batting title this year in D-1 for the West Coast Conference and has garnished several awards in college. 4 tool player (power still to come) with a great bat, great glove and speed, and an accurate strong arm (already has 4 outfield assists from right field!). Many of us who have seen him in Vancouver believe he is going to be with the Blue Jays soon. He looks confident and his approach to the plate (and how he runs to his position) is legit! Kalfus simply performs and impacts the game.

 

He's at the very least 4 years away from the MLB. And that would be the most optimistic time-line imaginable. Like, his mom is probably thinking "we'll be lucky if he's there in 6 years..."

Posted
Where do you project Brenden Kalfus (recent draft pick) to be next season? He is a all-around athlete that hits from both sides of the plate, won the batting title this year in D-1 for the West Coast Conference and has garnished several awards in college. 4 tool player (power still to come) with a great bat, great glove and speed, and an accurate strong arm (already has 4 outfield assists from right field!). Many of us who have seen him in Vancouver believe he is going to be with the Blue Jays soon. He looks confident and his approach to the plate (and how he runs to his position) is legit! Kalfus simply performs and impacts the game.

 

I understand that he might be a gem but you guys are way too hyped up about him.

Posted (edited)

Toronto Blue Jays (2013) First Year Player Draft

 

2013 Bonus Pool: $6,397,800

Total Budget (With Overage): $6,717,690

Amount of Pool Used: $1,793,280

Total Remaining Budget: $4,924,410

Code:

01|Phil Bickford ($2,921,000)|

02|Clinton Hollon ($1,168,200)|$0,467,280

03|Patrick Murphy ($0,650,800)|$0,500,000

04|Evan Smith ($0,446,100)|$0,350,000

05|Daniel Lietz ($0,334,000)|$0,200,000

06|Matt Boyd ($0,250,100)|$x,xxx,xxx

07|Conner Greene ($0,187,400)|$0,100,000

08|Kendall Graveman ($0,156,900)|

09|Chad Girodo ($0,146,500)|$x,xxx,xxx

10|Garrett Custons ($0,136,800)|$0,001,000

11|Jacob Brentz ($0,100,000)|

12|Tim Mayza ($0,100,000)|$0,100,000

13|Timothy Locastro ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

14|LB Dantzler ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

15|Jonathan Davis ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

16|Danny Jansen ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

17|Eric Lauer ($0,100,000)|

18|Sean Ratcliffe ($0,100,000)|$0,075,000

19|Christian Vasquez ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

20|Chas Frank ($0,100,000)|

21|Mike Reeves ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

22|Sam Tewes ($0,100,000)|-------------

23|Brendan Kalfus ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

24|Sean Hurley ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

25|Scott Silverstein ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

26|Tanner Cable ($0,100,000)|

27|Andrew Florides ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

28|Matt Dermody ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

29|Garrett Pickens ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

30|Rowdy Tellez ($0,100,000)|

31|Brison Celek ($0,100,000)|-------------

32|Josh Sawyer ($0,100,000)|-------------

33|Edgar Cabral ($0,100,000)|

34|Dane Dunning ($0,100,000)|-------------

35|Akoni Arriaga ($0,100,000)|

36|David Harris ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

37|Brett Barber ($0,100,000)|$x,xxx,xxx

38|Jon Nunnally Jr ($0,100,000)|

39|Zachary Levinson ($0,100,000)|

40|Antonio Ruiz ($0,100,000)|

Saved Slot: $1,305,020

 

Edited by DuckDuckGose
Numbers should be up to date, thanks TwistedLogic for the original table
Posted
So Girodo and Boyd have agreed to terms also?

 

Announced as expected to sign but no dollar amount has been released and nothing has been officially signed.

Posted

I noticed that the draft table I made has some formatting issues depending on what browser you use and what your monitor's resolution is so I removed the text version and will paste an image version here:

 

http://i.imgur.com/ohjgmYB.png

 

Legend:

- A Grey dollar amount next to a player's name is the recommended bonus for that slot determined by Major League Baseball.

- A Purple dollar amount next to a player's name is the amount of money the Toronto Blue Jays signed him for.

- $x,xxx,xxx : The player has signed, or is in the process of signing, but his signing bonus is currently unknown.

- ------------- : It has been confirmed that the player will not be signing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...