Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

The Jays can only afford 8-10 more losses in 2021 | Basic schedule analysis update


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

If the Jays hadn't lost that game against Baltimore, they would be 8-2 in their last 10, on a 7 game winning streak......and they'd still be 4 games out of the 2nd WC spot.

 

It's going to take a near miracle to make it in. Going to have to go 6-1 or 7-0 against the Yankees and not s*** the bed against Minnesota and Baltimore....and then there is the 6 game against the f***ing Rays to deal with.

Posted

We have 14 games left vs Baltimore and Minnesota, 13 vs the Yankees and Tampa and today's game vs Oakland.

 

You'd like to think we can win all 14 games vs Baltimore and Minnesota, which is entirely possible, but let's say we go 12-2. If we then go 8-6 vs the Yankees, Tampa and the one left with Oakland, that gets us to 90 wins. That will hopefully be enough to grab the last WC spot.

 

Let's win today's game so we only have to go 7-6 vs the Yankees and Tampa.

Posted
True. But they’ve also gone 7-3 n their last 10 and made up exactly….0 games.

 

They've gained 2 games against the Yankees and 3 against the As that helps.

Posted
We have 14 games left vs Baltimore and Minnesota, 13 vs the Yankees and Tampa and today's game vs Oakland.

 

You'd like to think we can win all 14 games vs Baltimore and Minnesota, which is entirely possible, but let's say we go 12-2. If we then go 8-6 vs the Yankees, Tampa and the one left with Oakland, that gets us to 90 wins. That will hopefully be enough to grab the last WC spot.

 

Let's win today's game so we only have to go 7-6 vs the Yankees and Tampa.

 

A W's as good as the next, Bud. Today's is bigger! Make up 3 games or 1.

Community Moderator
Posted
We have 14 games left vs Baltimore and Minnesota, 13 vs the Yankees and Tampa and today's game vs Oakland.

 

You'd like to think we can win all 14 games vs Baltimore and Minnesota, which is entirely possible, but let's say we go 12-2. If we then go 8-6 vs the Yankees, Tampa and the one left with Oakland, that gets us to 90 wins. That will hopefully be enough to grab the last WC spot.

 

Let's win today's game so we only have to go 7-6 vs the Yankees and Tampa.

 

12-2 is greedy even against bad teams.

 

No matter what, Toronto has to go bananas. The easiest way to do it is probably to destroy the Yankees and Tampa... I mean that's the hard path in terms of baseball but easier to make the math work

Posted
12-2 is greedy even against bad teams.

 

No matter what, Toronto has to go bananas. The easiest way to do it is probably to destroy the Yankees and Tampa... I mean that's the hard path in terms of baseball but easier to make the math work

 

Said it earlier, these 7 game's are the biggest set this series of games are all year, 2-0 is a start. :P

Posted
90 wins probably won't be enough. I agree that the only realistic way to make it, or at least greatly improve the odds, is to play better than expected against the Rays and Yankees (and obviously sweeping the A's today) while also doing what they're supposed to do against the O's and Twins. I think 92 or 93 wins at minimum is required as expecting 3 or 4 teams (BOS, NYY, OAK, SEA) to tank simultaneously is asking a lot. So 20-8 the rest of the way might give them a fighting chance, but they probably need to go something like 22-6 or 21-7. The margin for error is basically none.
Posted
All of those bullpen debacles basically ran them out of the playoffs. Such a pain in the ass.

 

Dumtoyo and the bullpen, and I'm not sure which cost more games.

Posted
Dumbtoyo makes bad decisions and should be fired, but man it seems like everyone that they have brought in that isn't Cimber, Richards, Mayza, or Romano has been an absolute dumpster fire. Hence the steady stream of DFAs.
Posted
Why does gruber think 90 wins is enough to snag a WC spot? Red Sox and Yankees already have 78/79 wins.

 

Boston has a really hard schedule until their last 6 games

Posted

If we are going with 92-70 as the benchmark, the teams have to have the following records and win percentages:

 

Jays 19-8 .704

Red Sox 13-10 .565

Yankees 14-12 .538

A's 18-7 .720

Mariners 17-8 .680

 

Now what the original analysis doesn't consider is that these teams face each other quite a few times. For instance, the Athletics and Mariners face each other seven times. Given that they both have to win two-thirds of their games, this is going to be deadly for one or both teams. Either one completely dominates the match up and basically eliminates the other from contention, or they both hurt each other's chances. A 5-2 record merely puts one team in line with the win percentage they need. But a 2-5 record eats up nearly all of the loss allocation. The Jays won't have to worry about both of these teams. They'll only have to worry about one, or none.

 

These are the games left between these teams:

A's/M's - 7 games

BOS/NYY - 3 games

Bos/M's - 3 games

 

If you assume every team splits those games:

 

Red Sox 3-3

Yankees 1.5-1.5

A's 3.5-3.5

Mariners 5-5

 

Subtract that out from the records needed to get to 92 wins and you get these records in the remaining games:

 

Red Sox 10-7 .588

Yankees 12.5-10.5 .543

A's 14.5-3.5 .806

Mariners 12-3 .800

 

In this context it looks way better for the Jays. Only the Yankees and Red Sox are the ones to worry about. Someone in Boston could be doing the same calculation for the Jays/Yankees games and really be salivating. But from our perspective, the Jays need to dominate those games so that analysis would be irrelevant.

Posted
If we are going with 92-70 as the benchmark, the teams have to have the following records and win percentages:

 

Jays 19-8 .704

Red Sox 13-10 .565

Yankees 14-12 .538

A's 18-7 .720

Mariners 17-8 .680

 

Now what the original analysis doesn't consider is that these teams face each other quite a few times. For instance, the Athletics and Mariners face each other seven times. Given that they both have to win two-thirds of their games, this is going to be deadly for one or both teams. Either one completely dominates the match up and basically eliminates the other from contention, or they both hurt each other's chances. A 5-2 record merely puts one team in line with the win percentage they need. But a 2-5 record eats up nearly all of the loss allocation. The Jays won't have to worry about both of these teams. They'll only have to worry about one, or none.

 

These are the games left between these teams:

A's/M's - 7 games

BOS/NYY - 3 games

Bos/M's - 3 games

 

If you assume every team splits those games:

 

Red Sox 3-3

Yankees 1.5-1.5

A's 3.5-3.5

Mariners 5-5

 

Subtract that out from the records needed to get to 92 wins and you get these records in the remaining games:

 

Red Sox 10-7 .588

Yankees 12.5-10.5 .543

A's 14.5-3.5 .806

Mariners 12-3 .800

 

In this context it looks way better for the Jays. Only the Yankees and Red Sox are the ones to worry about. Someone in Boston could be doing the same calculation for the Jays/Yankees games and really be salivating. But from our perspective, the Jays need to dominate those games so that analysis would be irrelevant.

 

Oakland was always the team to worry about in my mind. They are infinitely better than Seattle and Boston, who are sub .500 teams masquerading as contenders. This series was so huge. We're only 2 games back of a playoff spot in the loss column with a lot of wins coming against Baltimore.

Posted

What Jays need to do going forward to make WC, still have a legit shot at 1st WC spot.

 

Take 3 of 4 @ Yanks

Take 3 of 4 @ Os

Take 2 of 3 vs Rays

Take 3 of 3 vs Twins

Take 1 of 3 @ Rays

Take 3 of 4 @ Twins

Take 2 of 3 vs Yanks

Take 3 of 3 vs Os

 

20-7 record

 

This would give us 94 wins and likely the 1st WC spot and a home game. I honestly think this is very plausible. We could even afford another loss or 2 and still make a WC spot.

Posted
Oakland was always the team to worry about in my mind. They are infinitely better than Seattle and Boston, who are sub .500 teams masquerading as contenders. This series was so huge. We're only 2 games back of a playoff spot in the loss column with a lot of wins coming against Baltimore.

 

You are making yourself looking like a fool with this Boston Red Sox hate. This is a team with a +58 run differential. They have scored the third most runs in baseball (2 spots above the Jays) and they have a middle of the road pitching staff (6 spots below the Jays in ERA). That is hardly the makings of a sub .500 baseball team.

Posted
Five wins down.

 

18-8.

 

What Jays need to do going forward to make WC, still have a legit shot at 1st WC spot.

 

Take 3 of 4 @ Yanks

Take 3 of 4 @ Os

Take 2 of 3 vs Rays

Take 3 of 3 vs Twins

Take 1 of 3 @ Rays

Take 3 of 4 @ Twins

Take 2 of 3 vs Yanks

Take 3 of 3 vs Os

 

20-7 record

 

This would give us 94 wins and likely the 1st WC spot and a home game. I honestly think this is very plausible. We could even afford another loss or 2 and still make a WC spot.

 

For 93 wins, matching our total from 2015, we have to go, what, 19-8? That seems somewhat doable.

 

26 games left.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...