Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Tony Gwynn with a .338 career BA and a 4.2% K percentage would have to be an 80 hit tool. Boggs isn't a whole lot worse than that either.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Babe was an 80/80 Looks like it to me. Ted Williams maybe too. His K-rate was a lot lower than Ruth's but SLG was similar.
Laika Community Moderator Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Looks like it to me. Ted Williams maybe too. His K-rate was a lot lower than Ruth's but SLG was similar. Ted Williams is like, THE 80 hit tool. Many consider him to be the best "hitter" ever. He literally wrote the book on hitting!
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Ted Williams is like, THE 80 hit tool. Many consider him to be the best "hitter" ever. He literally wrote the book on hitting! Yeah the hit tool was for sure an 80 and I think the power was too but that's why I said 80. I've read that book before, it's really good and really simplifies things.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Mike Trout? He strikes out a bit more than your prototypical 80 hitter but someone who's on their 6th consecutive season of 170 wRC+ and possibly getting better has to have at least one 80 grade tool, and Trout's isn't power. He's got a .335 ISO this year and that's playing at one of the worst hitting parks in LA. Had a .290 in 2015 as well. Probably not an 80 because now there are so many guys like Stanton, Judge and Gallo but he's close I'd say.
baseballsss Verified Member Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Lou Gehrig has got to be close to an 80
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 He's got a .335 ISO this year and that's playing at one of the worst hitting parks in LA. Had a .290 in 2015 as well. Probably not an 80 because now there are so many guys like Stanton, Judge and Gallo but he's close I'd say. I think sort of how NJH mentioned about Pujols, Trout posts great power numbers because of his elite hitting ability. He has the perfect swing, hits the ball hard and at the perfect launch angle, but he doesn't have the prodigious raw power of some of those guys that you brought up.
Captain Adama Old-Timey Member Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 I would think Manny Ramirez was an 80 hitter.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted September 3, 2017 Posted September 3, 2017 I think sort of how NJH mentioned about Pujols, Trout posts great power numbers because of his elite hitting ability. He has the perfect swing, hits the ball hard and at the perfect launch angle, but he doesn't have the prodigious raw power of some of those guys that you brought up. Yeah that's fair.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted September 3, 2017 Posted September 3, 2017 Yeah that's fair. This thread is so full of s***. Trout and Pujols have awesome power. Their not using line drive goodness to hit 375 foot floaters to the opposite field. 1. Trout and Pujols have hit some of the longest homeruns in Angels/Cardinals history 2. http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2015/01/18/106693382/blast-those-offseason-blues-away-the-10-longest-home-runs-of-2014-in-gifs Trout hit the longest homerun of 2014. 489 feet. He has as much power as anyone. 3. I am guessing both had higher line drive percentages then say Mike Stanton, thus hit for higher average 4. Trout strikes out an amazing amount for a .320 hitter. Does he have one of the highest batting average in play ever?? Fact is Trout and Pujols have awesome power. John Olerud 1993, or Wade Boggs 1987 (when weird ball made his line drives go over the fence) are examples of good line drive hitters, also getting homers. Trout/Pujols have as much a power tool as a hit tool. Pujols has won 2 homer titles, 1 batting title. Trout Pujols Strong. Hit ball a mile, when in air. Pujols (prime, and even now) doesn't strike out. Trout strikes out, but runs well, so probably gets more infield hits.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted September 3, 2017 Posted September 3, 2017 yes stupid to run comps out for a guy that's going to rewrite the record books probably a cross between the splendid splinter and that 'roids guy
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted September 3, 2017 Posted September 3, 2017 Pannone and Zeuch pitched well, loving it. http://mlbfarm.com/index.php?team=TOR
keggy Verified Member Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 A true 80 hitter has bat to ball skills, puts the ball in play consistently with authority, and doesn't strike out. The barrel stays in the hitting zone for such a long time they can make solid contact even when they're fooled. They should be competing for batting titles on a regular basis. More credit to someone who can make contact with authority as opposed to slapping the ball into play. An 80 hitter's vintage seasons will often have more home runs than strikeouts. To me, Joe Dimaggio is the prototypical 80 hit guy. Gwynn, Williams, and Boggs all up there. Edgar Martinez is a step below that, but has a similar profile. A lot of current guys are fooled way too often to be considered an 80 hit.
Captain Adama Old-Timey Member Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 A true 80 hitter has bat to ball skills, puts the ball in play consistently with authority, and doesn't strike out. The barrel stays in the hitting zone for such a long time they can make solid contact even when they're fooled. They should be competing for batting titles on a regular basis. More credit to someone who can make contact with authority as opposed to slapping the ball into play. An 80 hitter's vintage seasons will often have more home runs than strikeouts. To me, Joe Dimaggio is the prototypical 80 hit guy. Gwynn, Williams, and Boggs all up there. Edgar Martinez is a step below that, but has a similar profile. A lot of current guys are fooled way too often to be considered an 80 hit. Is it that they're fooled too much? Or are the pitchers getting better? (relative to their historical counterparts.)
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 Is it that they're fooled too much? Or are the pitchers getting better? (relative to their historical counterparts.) A very fair point when you consider the KRate of pitchers throughout the history of the game. Cy Youngs k/9 career was 3.43 and his best season was 5.89. So many more balls were being put in play back then. But, the mound was higher then and the fences were 5 miles away.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 A true 80 hitter has bat to ball skills, puts the ball in play consistently with authority, and doesn't strike out. The barrel stays in the hitting zone for such a long time they can make solid contact even when they're fooled. They should be competing for batting titles on a regular basis. More credit to someone who can make contact with authority as opposed to slapping the ball into play. An 80 hitter's vintage seasons will often have more home runs than strikeouts. To me, Joe Dimaggio is the prototypical 80 hit guy. Gwynn, Williams, and Boggs all up there. Edgar Martinez is a step below that, but has a similar profile. A lot of current guys are fooled way too often to be considered an 80 hit. Yeah. Placido Polanco 80 and Mike Trout 70
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Yeah. Placido Polanco 80 and Mike Trout 70 Rance Mulliniks was pretty good too. This is a dumb conversation. Hitting has three components, power, average and patience. Ted Williams combined all three better than anyone. In modern day baseball Frank Thomas was good in his 20s. Barry Bonds was good and had more homeruns than strikeouts the year he turned 40. There has been no one, that I am aware of that could do what Ted Williams could do. Barry Bonds took every drug known to man, and I think he may have got so strong, he could cut down his swing, still hit for power, and cut his k-rate way down. So for his best four year stretch, Barry Bonds, almost did what Ted Williams could do. Bonds had more power. But it took every drug known to man to do it. Bonds was good. He was at a Frank Thomas/Edgar Martinez level before 2000.
Slade Old-Timey Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Can we end this terrible off topic discussion?
jimedmonds Verified Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 what about me in my prime? 60/60? p.s. how am i not in the HOF? ridiculous!
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted September 5, 2017 Author Posted September 5, 2017 what about me in my prime? 60/60? p.s. how am i not in the HOF? ridiculous! Because you spell your first and last name without any caps.
Captain Adama Old-Timey Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Can we end this terrible off topic discussion? No.
Nafro Verified Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Because you spell your first and last name without any caps. This ^
Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 this is a Milb/Prospect thread isn't it??
Melvin Verified Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 what about me in my prime? 60/60? p.s. how am i not in the HOF? ridiculous! Because you're too busy on real housewives to spend time massaging the right people in order to get those Cooperstown votes.
Ray Verified Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Finalists for 2017 Baseball-America Minor League PoTY: Both Vlad and Bo. What a time to be alive.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Where do Bo and Vlad Jr. start next season? A+ or AA?
KevinGregg Verified Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Where do Bo and Vlad Jr. start next season? A+ or AA? what do either of them have to prove at high A I say AA
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 what do either of them have to prove at high A I say AA I would start them in AA as well. Do they get Spring Training Invites?
bendera3 Verified Member Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 I would start them in AA as well. Do they get Spring Training Invites? I would. Let them be around the big guys for a few weeks before sending them down to the minor league side.
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP The 19-year-old top prospect has made 16 High-A starts. He is 3-2 with a 2.92 ERA. In 61 2/3 innings, he's walked 35, but he's struck out 83 batters. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now