Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Grant77 said:

I wasn't watching the broadcast, but did they ever explain why there was no interference called on Suarez?

The reason I ask is because I umpire baseball from time to time and we once had an on-deck batter struck by an errant throw in a playoff game and we got the book out and looked it up. The rules don't differentiate between on-deck batters or other players on the field of play.

Rule 6.01(b) states that in this instance:

"the ball is dead, the batter is declared out and
all runners return to the bases occupied at the time of the pitch"

No, no explanation they just said “ball was out of play” which it clearly wasn’t 

Posted
5 minutes ago, HomeRunHomer said:

Jays really do trust the wrong relievers.

They don't have any elite ones to trust. Just a bunch of average arms

Posted
9 minutes ago, Rimar said:

Bieber if 

 

Gimenes is no a bad trade, his defense prevented many runs, and batting 9, he's no harmful.  What is harmful is to have utilities players batting  2,4,5,6, instead of 7,8,9. Ideally Kirk, Clement and Gimenes only batting 7-9. And 1-6 we will have few guys who can hit 30+ HR and have good AVG.

Gimenez can't hit or run now. Injuries. 

 

He does not deserve an 100 millions dollars contract. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Angrioter said:

Gimenez can't hit or run now. Injuries. 

 

He does not deserve an 100 millions dollars contract. 

Cleveland gives out bad contracts and we pick them up (Gimenez, Straw, who’s next?)

Posted
Just now, Stangstag said:

Cleveland gives out bad contracts and we pick them up (Gimenez, Straw, who’s next?)

2 playoffs outing Bieber for Khal Stephen 

Posted
Just now, Alejandro Murphy said:

Ump dictated the flow of the game with that bad call on Arozarena

 

 

They tied it 3-3. s***** outcome but zero excuses.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Stangstag said:

No, no explanation they just said “ball was out of play” which it clearly wasn’t 

The ball was definitely not out of play. That's one of the worst botched calls you'll ever see from an umpiring crew. I get that it's unusual, but they need to know the rules and apply them properly. The runner is out, there's no nuance to the rules.

Posted

I'm most concerned that the FO or manager feels we have a better chance of winning with our average/volatile pen and would rather take a starter out after a set innings or times-through-the-order limit. You need to lean on your starters to have any success. Taking out any pitcher (i don't care of he's a rookie) after 70 pitches in what is essentially a must win game,  while keeping the score close, is maddening.

Posted
Just now, bluejaysinternNo5 said:

Garbage first two games. Silver lining: Pressure is now on Seattle to close it out before returning to Toronto.

Why would they care about returning to Toronto when they are s***-kicking them at the dome?

Posted
Just now, Laika said:

Jays don't have the pen to be pulling their good staters at 70 pitches 

Louis Varland is a home run machine. Such a disappointment.

Everyone in the Jays pen is just kinda average so they aren't going to deplete. That said Yesavage from 70-100 is probably better than anyone they could bring in

Posted
1 minute ago, bluejaysinternNo5 said:

Garbage first two games. Silver lining: Pressure is now on Seattle to close it out before returning to Toronto.

Pressure? 

 

2-0 and 3 games at home with Woo, Kirby and Castillo against Bieber and Scherzer? 

Posted
Just now, Angrioter said:

Pressure? 

 

2-0 and 3 games at home with Woo, Kirby and Castillo against Bieber and Scherzer? 

Exactly! Games they are expected to win big time. Kind of like these first two games for us. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Laika said:

Jays don't have the pen to be pulling their good staters at 70 pitches 

Louis Varland is a home run machine. Such a disappointment.

I would also rather lose with my best pitchers on the mound. Maybe it doesn’t work out either way. But why not not let your best pitchers get the biggest outs.

Posted
2 minutes ago, gruber9292 said:

For life of me I just will never understand how Shatkins under values the importance of a strong pen. You'll never win a WS with a mediocre pen. 

Well especially when they constantly are pulling starters in the 5th inning even if they are doing well. You're setting your team up to fail more than they should.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Grant77 said:

I wasn't watching the broadcast, but did they ever explain why there was no interference called on Suarez?

The reason I ask is because I umpire baseball from time to time and we once had an on-deck batter struck by an errant throw in a playoff game and we got the book out and looked it up. The rules don't differentiate between on-deck batters or other players on the field of play.

Rule 6.01(b) states that in this instance:

"the ball is dead, the batter is declared out and
all runners return to the bases occupied at the time of the pitch"

Suarez was not on the playing field, he was sitting on a metal strip right at the edge of the dugout and not on the dirt (playing field). so the ball hit Suarez who was deemed to be in the dugout

Posted
Just now, gruber9292 said:

For life of me I just will never understand how Shatkins under values the importance of a strong pen. You'll never win a WS with a mediocre pen. 

The problem is elite relievers command such a premium when considering IP/WAR. We really need to develop more relievers within. 

And it's not like Hoffman and Garcia are cheap..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...