Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
60 innings, 85 K's, 28 BB, 3.01 ERA, 1.12 WHIP, 1.1 WAR, 8 HLDS.

 

0.90 FIP with 22 saves and a 15:1 K:BB ratio for Tampa Bay.

Posted

We traded a MVP for that guy. One of the worst trades in the Shatkins era.

 

With that said, I would have preferred to get rid of Thorton over Merryweather. He might always be a "what if" guy but we know Thorton is a "will never be" guy lol.

Community Moderator
Posted

They cut Merryweather?

 

This will be my last post. I will no longer be a fan. Goodbye forever.

Posted
The only way this makes sense is if the Jays know something bad medical wise. Thornton is of less value and has a greater chance of clearing waivers, all things being equal.
Posted
Rays or Pirates will get him.

 

The Jays do have time to trade him. I think they will find someone willing to give up a lottery ticket

Posted
We traded a MVP for that guy. One of the worst trades in the Shatkins era.

 

With that said, I would have preferred to get rid of Thorton over Merryweather. He might always be a "what if" guy but we know Thorton is a "will never be" guy lol.

 

Cleveland got 72 PA's from JD. What on earth did you think the FO was going to get for him? You can argue they ought to have traded him before that season started - but once he got hurt, they were f***ed.

Posted
Cleveland got 72 PA's from JD. What on earth did you think the FO was going to get for him? You can argue they ought to have traded him before that season started - but once he got hurt, they were f***ed.

 

I assumed this was already considered. Shatkins let a valuable asset like Donaldon get into his walk year when they had 0 interest in building a world series winner at that time (rightfully so because they were all aging). At that point, you'd think trading your best asset who also plays the same position as your best prospect at the time (Vladdy) would be the smart and logical move.

 

Ah well... not point going into depth on this. We're well past that time now (thankfully so).

Posted
Cleveland got 72 PA's from JD. What on earth did you think the FO was going to get for him? You can argue they ought to have traded him before that season started - but once he got hurt, they were f***ed.

 

It was JD with salary retention too.

YES, I thought they should have gotten much more than what they received.

Posted
Cleveland got 72 PA's from JD. What on earth did you think the FO was going to get for him? You can argue they ought to have traded him before that season started - but once he got hurt, they were f***ed.

 

Cleveland got the use of an MVP calibre player in the playoffs. It didn't work out for them in the playoffs, but teams always pay up for that chance.

Posted

 

I read Chris Black's thread on him, and he pointed out that the platoon may not be a strict LHP vs RHP between Belt and the Catchers at DH. It could be based on pitch mix of the SP. Belt is fine against LHP and he's great at low pitches (sinkerballers, curve/slider guys) and his weakness his high FB, which is Jansen's strength.

Posted
LOL the Bellinger Fanboys could at least dish it back but you Biggio fanboys clearly have your panties in a bunch over all this. Please get your T-levels checked but in the meantime I'll try and be as nice as I can here.

 

You idiots have all been on Craig Biggio's sons nuts for years and I've been telling you guys he sucks for just as long. I don't know if you guys are colorblind or what but if you look at his statcast page you'll see a lot of blue. That's bad in case you didn't know.

 

I don't think I have ever mentioned Biggio before...lol. Let it go man.

Posted
Cleveland got 72 PA's from JD. What on earth did you think the FO was going to get for him? You can argue they ought to have traded him before that season started - but once he got hurt, they were f***ed.

 

Only alternative was to keep him and give him the QO. Either he stays for another year (and the Jays would have gotten bounce back JD from 2019) or he leaves and the Jays get a pick. That was the avenue to go to, but obviously the front office wanted to clear money and tank, so it was never a real possibility.

Posted
Sorry if I missed it, but has anyone mentioned how the shift rules might affect Belt next year?

 

pretty sure he was shifted against every AB. He also was 9 for 13 on bunting against the shift. So you'd have to take that into account too. Overall it's probably more about his health

Posted
I had no idea Toronto has good chicken tenders. Give the man a years supply a la free soda in the machine in Oakland.

 

You can give him the shittiest tenders anyway...it won't matter once he puts ketchup on them. Makes you wonder how many other terrible life choices he makes

Posted

 

These dimensions aren’t even right anymore lol. But yeah he should obv hit more homers vs SF and that high deep RF wall

Posted

Looks like he could hit up to 40 HR, with health and regular playing time

 

Not to reopen the whole debate, but Belt hitting behind Vladdy will force the RHP to challenge Vlad..... let's hope he doesn't chase as much

Posted
Looks like he could hit up to 40 HR, with health and regular playing time

 

Not to reopen the whole debate, but Belt hitting behind Vladdy will force the RHP to challenge Vlad..... let's hope he doesn't chase as much

 

That’s just it, Vlad needs to get that it doesn’t need to be him doing everything. He hasn’t got there yet.

Posted
I had no idea Toronto has good chicken tenders. Give the man a years supply a la free soda in the machine in Oakland.

 

How about we give him healthy food while we expect him to perform at a high level for us instead... wouldn't want Vladdy getting any ideas himself lol.

 

And yes, I'm really fun at parties lol.

Posted
That’s just it, Vlad needs to get that it doesn’t need to be him doing everything. He hasn’t got there yet.

 

Chris Black had an interesting twitter thread about how the key to Vlad unlocking his full potential largely hinges on laying off of low pitches. That will enable the launch angle issues/ground ball problems to be largely mitigated as he has difficulty in elevating those pitches.

Posted

 

Seems weird… either one of Kirk/Jansen has an undisclosed injury or there’s a trade in the works. Or they’re somehow going to shuffle the DH between Kirk, Jansen, Springer and Belt. Which doesn’t leave Belt with much playtime

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...