Todd Van Anus Verified Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Let's cut the crap and get hardcore: who are some potential realistic starting pitcher options for the Jays this offseason? Either via trade or free agency. I think this team is 1 year and 1-2 stud starting pitchers away from being a real force. I'd love to sign Gerrit Cole and would pay him like a high end escort, but he's probably not a realistic option. So let's hear it...don't beat around the bush and act like a panzy...who are some realistic options?
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Michael Wacha and Michael Pineda could be nice buy lows.
Todd Van Anus Verified Member Posted October 30, 2019 Author Posted October 30, 2019 Michael Wacha and Michael Pineda could be nice buy lows. I like how your mind works...good options! You're definitely not a panzy.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 In trades? Kluber and Archer might be available if the Indians and Pirates want to dump salary (and in Pitts case they will have a new front office that are more likely to tank than try to win now). I would think you wouldn't need to give up a top prospect to acquire either of those guys if they were available. Although, Archer signed one of those "I'll bend over and let Tampa F me for my entire prime" contracts so he's still cheap enough for the Pirates to hold on to even if they rebuild. In free agency, the middle group of free agent Sp's are probably all realistic. Gibson, Pineda, Roark, Miley, Porcello, etc, etc.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 In trades? Kluber and Archer might be available if the Indians and Pirates want to dump salary (and in Pitts case they will have a new front office that are more likely to tank than try to win now). I would think you wouldn't need to give up a top prospect to acquire either of those guys if they were available. Although, Archer signed one of those "I'll bend over and let Tampa F me for my entire prime" contracts so he's still cheap enough for the Pirates to hold on to even if they rebuild. In free agency, the middle group of free agent Sp's are probably all realistic. Gibson, Pineda, Roark, Miley, Porcello, etc, etc. I'd roll the dice on alex wood if his discount is deep enough.
Todd Van Anus Verified Member Posted October 30, 2019 Author Posted October 30, 2019 In trades? Kluber and Archer might be available if the Indians and Pirates want to dump salary (and in Pitts case they will have a new front office that are more likely to tank than try to win now). I would think you wouldn't need to give up a top prospect to acquire either of those guys if they were available. Although, Archer signed one of those "I'll bend over and let Tampa F me for my entire prime" contracts so he's still cheap enough for the Pirates to hold on to even if they rebuild. In free agency, the middle group of free agent Sp's are probably all realistic. Gibson, Pineda, Roark, Miley, Porcello, etc, etc. Kluber and Archer would be a wet dream. What do you think it'd cost to land either of those guys? Pirates would want a s*** ton of bricks for Archer, considering how much they gave to acquire him.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Kluber and Archer would be a wet dream. What do you think it'd cost to land either of those guys? Pirates would want a s*** ton of bricks for Archer, considering how much they gave to acquire him. That's not how it works + the GM who gave those pieces up is gone + Meadows/Glasnow are both in about the 95th percentile of potential outcomes. TB lucked out beyond their wildest dreams. Archer would be a nice target at the right price.
Todd Van Anus Verified Member Posted October 30, 2019 Author Posted October 30, 2019 That's not how it works + the GM who gave those pieces up is gone + Meadows/Glasnow are both in about the 95th percentile of potential outcomes. TB lucked out beyond their wildest dreams. Archer would be a nice target at the right price. So then what do you think it would cost to get Archer wearing a Blue Jays jock strap in 2020?
wamco Verified Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 I could see Kirk or Moreno moved in a trade or one of orelvis Martinez/ hiraldo
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 I could see Kirk or Moreno moved in a trade or one of orelvis Martinez/ hiraldo Is it the right time to make that type of deal though. All of these guys should be more valuable a year from now, after another year of development and being closer to the majors. Orelvis for example should reach full season A ball in 2020, or even start there and elevate to A+ by the end of the season. Also, a philosophy of sustained winning means you don't trade your high end prospects and in fact even when the team is a contender, you are still trying to acquire elite prospect types.
wamco Verified Member Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 I agree. I just meant If they are gonna look to make a trade for a big piece, you have to give to get. Could move a teoscar type OF this offseason as well of course for a bullpen arm or something
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 Starting Pitchers Brett Anderson (32) Chris Archer (31) — $9MM club option with a $1.75MM buyout Jake Arrieta (34) — can opt out of remaining one year and $20MM unless Phillies exercise a two-year, $40MM option Homer Bailey (34) Clay Buchholz (35) Madison Bumgarner (30) Trevor Cahill (32) Andrew Cashner (33) — $10MM vesting/player option Jhoulys Chacin (32) Yu Darvish (33) — can opt out of remaining four years and $81MM Gerrit Cole (29) Ross Detwiler (34) Marco Estrada (36) Kyle Gibson (32) Gio Gonzalez (34) Kendall Graveman (29) – $3MM club option Cole Hamels (36) Matt Harvey (31) Jeremy Hellickson (33) Felix Hernandez (34) Rich Hill (40) Edwin Jackson (36) Dallas Keuchel (32) Josh Lindblom (33) Wade Miley (33) Shelby Miller (29) Matt Moore (31) Ivan Nova (33) Jake Odorizzi (30) Martin Perez (29) — $7MM club option with a $500K buyout Michael Pineda (30) Drew Pomeranz (31) Rick Porcello (31) Jose Quintana (31) — $11.5MM club option with a $1MM buyout JC Ramirez (31) Clayton Richard (36) Tanner Roark (33) Tyson Ross (33) Hyun-Jin Ryu (33) Ervin Santana (37) Drew Smyly (29) Dan Straily (31) Stephen Strasburg (31) — can opt out of remaining four years and $100MM Julio Teheran (29) — $12MM club option with a $1MM buyout Nick Tropeano (29) Jason Vargas (37) — $8MM club option with a $2MM buyout Edinson Volquez (36) Michael Wacha (28) Adam Wainwright (38) Zack Wheeler (30) Alex Wood (29)
bones10 Old-Timey Member Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 What do you guys think about Bumgarner as a signing
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 I wouldn't be upset, but there's a lot of bullets on that arm.
Beans Verified Member Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 I would sign some buy-low SPs on 1-2 year deals and give the kids we have in the system another year to develop. We're still building. That said, I like Alex Wood and Odorizzi if the price is right.
Todd Van Anus Verified Member Posted October 31, 2019 Author Posted October 31, 2019 Is it the right time to make that type of deal though. All of these guys should be more valuable a year from now, after another year of development and being closer to the majors. Orelvis for example should reach full season A ball in 2020, or even start there and elevate to A+ by the end of the season. Also, a philosophy of sustained winning means you don't trade your high end prospects and in fact even when the team is a contender, you are still trying to acquire elite prospect types. That is a great point that I never thought of. Ensure to sell high on your prospects to maximize their value. Awesome insight!
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 Nice to add: Cole Strasburg Realistic: Roark Wacha
Barkerfan23 Verified Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 We have like 42 starting pitchers already. You guys know only like 5 can start together right ?
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 Nice to add: Cole Strasburg Realistic: Roark Wacha Don't want Wacha or Roark. I feel like both may just be micro improvements over our internal options, especially Wacha. If we're going to spend on SPs, then I want to spend on a noticable improvement, like Cole or Stras (both unlikely), or Odorizzi, Wheeler (more likely).
Laika Community Moderator Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 Don't want Wacha or Roark. I feel like both may just be micro improvements over our internal options, especially Wacha. If we're going to spend on SPs, then I want to spend on a noticable improvement, like Cole or Stras (both unlikely), or Odorizzi, Wheeler (more likely). Have you looked at the SP depth chart? Thornton - gave up a lot of runs! Borucki - didn't pitch Shoemaker - barely pitched Waguespack - sucks Kay - rookie, barely pitched Tanner Roark was a 2 win pitcher and he would be at the top of Toronto's depth chart. Wacha sucked but he is two years removed from being good and at 28 he's a good project. Toronto should be trying to get like three arms, including Tanner Roark, an equivalent pitcher, and ideally someone even better like Wheels Ontario.
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 Have you looked at the SP depth chart? Thornton - gave up a lot of runs! Borucki - didn't pitch Shoemaker - barely pitched Waguespack - sucks Kay - rookie, barely pitched Tanner Roark was a 2 win pitcher and he would be at the top of Toronto's depth chart. Wacha sucked but he is two years removed from being good and at 28 he's a good project. Toronto should be trying to get like three arms, including Tanner Roark, an equivalent pitcher, and ideally someone even better like Wheels Ontario. What about internal development? Thornton showed enough that and is young enough, that it would be reasonable to expect some improvement. Kay looks like he could be good. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of those guys give us cheap 1-2 wins. Is it worth paying Roark for that? Would rather spend a bit more for 3-4 WAR pitchers. Don't mind being locked into guys like that.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 What about internal development? Thornton showed enough that and is young enough, that it would be reasonable to expect some improvement. Kay looks like he could be good. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of those guys give us cheap 1-2 wins. Is it worth paying Roark for that? Would rather spend a bit more for 3-4 WAR pitchers. Don't mind being locked into guys like that. Do you think it would only cost a bit more?
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 Do you think it would only cost a bit more? Maybe an additional 10M AAV? Can't see it being ridiculous in this market.
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 Maybe an additional 10M AAV? Can't see it being ridiculous in this market. Nvm, even less. Could be only a 5M AAV diff https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2020-top-50-free-agents/
Maico450 Verified Member Posted November 4, 2019 Posted November 4, 2019 I would take a serious run at Dallas Keuchel. No qualifying offer attached. Familiar with AL hitters.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 I would take a serious run at Dallas Keuchel. No qualifying offer attached. Familiar with AL hitters. That's key. Very important.
Todd Van Anus Verified Member Posted November 5, 2019 Author Posted November 5, 2019 I would take a serious run at Dallas Keuchel. No qualifying offer attached. Familiar with AL hitters. Is he a UFA with no draft picks attached?
BTS Community Moderator Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 Is he a UFA with no draft picks attached? Baseball is not hockey.
Todd Van Anus Verified Member Posted November 5, 2019 Author Posted November 5, 2019 Baseball is not hockey. I know. Draft picks attached = RFA.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now