Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yes - I think times have changed (even though that was only a few years ago). The Astros didn't give up as much as the Cubs to get multiple years of G.Cole.

 

Less than two years ago, and Huntington is a moron with no payroll. No f***ing way, man.

  • Replies 429
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Yes. Because this is the Blue Jays. And Chapman is sexy whereas Happ isn't. Star factor means something.

 

If Donaldson was healthy and on his game then I really do think the Jays could get a real nice haul, but that's not what we're working with.

 

I relish the opportunity to be wrong in this case. We have 1-2 months to wait and see.

 

WS titles mean something, GM's don't get caught up in sexy names at the deadline... whatever we'll see.

Posted
The Yankees aren't the only suitor for Happ, they can pay a premium to get him (Frazier or Florial) or they can f*** off. We can get the likes of Albert Abreu from any number of contending teams.
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Teams are valuing prospects more now. I think we will get a good package for Happ, but Frazier would be in the super great territory, and I don't think that's happening. With a worse/more desperate GM, maybe, but not Cashman. The team that will blow their load is probably Seattle, but they don't have enough intriguing pieces.

 

The Braves are 1st place and have a deep system. Maybe the Jays can make a deal there. Though with our luck AA is probably super strict about keeping prospects now.

Posted
I'm not sure if this is still a thing, but wouldn't the Yanks needs to pay a premium to get any MLB player off of a AL East team?

 

It depends on the circumstances. If the player being acquired has multiple years of control, then certainly yes. If the player is a rental, like Happ, and the Jays have fallen out of contention... no... except... the Yankees need starting pitching the most out of any contender/buyer. THAT is why they will pay a premium IMO, not because they're in our division.

Posted
And guess what? JA Happ is actually a reasonable Qualifying Offer candidate if contenders don't meet the Jays' asking price. In that scenario we'd either get him on a one year deal around $17.5M, or we'd get a compensation draft pick if he signs elsewhere. This would also give the Jays leverage in negotiating an extension with Happ. Happ is on his 4th straight season of being a 3 WAR pitcher, so if it comes down to paying him $17.5M on a one year deal, in a year where our payroll is stripped way back anyway, I'm okay with that. We don't have to trade him for any sort of middling return, there is leverage here.
Posted
I'm not sure if this is still a thing, but wouldn't the Yanks needs to pay a premium to get any MLB player off of a AL East team?

 

I agree with Dinger. For a rental player, I don't think a premium is necessary. If they had several years of control, it definitely becomes more problematic.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
We aren't locked into the Yankees or Mariners. Tons of contending teams will want Happ at the deadline lol. Yankees are going to need to move one of their top prospects to upgrade their rotation plain and simple. Starting pitching is in high demand.
Posted
We aren't locked into the Yankees or Mariners. Tons of contending teams will want Happ at the deadline lol. Yankees are going to need to move one of their top prospects to upgrade their rotation plain and simple. Starting pitching is in high demand.

 

I knew Jonn would put you guys straight... last week of July is when all the fun happens.

Posted
And guess what? JA Happ is actually a reasonable Qualifying Offer candidate if contenders don't meet the Jays' asking price. In that scenario we'd either get him on a one year deal around $17.5M, or we'd get a compensation draft pick if he signs elsewhere. This would also give the Jays leverage in negotiating an extension with Happ. Happ is on his 4th straight season of being a 3 WAR pitcher, so if it comes down to paying him $17.5M on a one year deal, in a year where our payroll is stripped way back anyway, I'm okay with that. We don't have to trade him for any sort of middling return, there is leverage here.

 

Unless he pulls an Estrada of 2017 I don't think the QO changes his value at all. If he continues to pitch the way he does he's going to command a much better return than a comp pick that could be in the 3rd round.

Posted
And guess what? JA Happ is actually a reasonable Qualifying Offer candidate if contenders don't meet the Jays' asking price. In that scenario we'd either get him on a one year deal around $17.5M, or we'd get a compensation draft pick if he signs elsewhere. This would also give the Jays leverage in negotiating an extension with Happ. Happ is on his 4th straight season of being a 3 WAR pitcher, so if it comes down to paying him $17.5M on a one year deal, in a year where our payroll is stripped way back anyway, I'm okay with that. We don't have to trade him for any sort of middling return, there is leverage here.

 

As is JD... 2 comp picks at worst, never feed that wants to beat you.

Posted
Unless he pulls an Estrada of 2017 I don't think the QO changes his value at all. If he continues to pitch the way he does he's going to command a much better return than a comp pick that could be in the 3rd round.

 

Oh that's right, f***. A 2nd and 3rd, not worth it.

Jays Centre Contributor
Posted
Why would they do that, why would we?

 

Cause they have some good prospects and Happ is what we need imo. An everyday player that can play anywhere with the power to be a star with everyday ABs. Cubs need pitching and could use Pillar better than we are. Seems like a perfect fit for what they want/do. They also won't be using Happ everyday for a few years it seems.

Posted
Cause they have some good prospects and Happ is what we need imo. An everyday player that can play anywhere with the power to be a star with everyday ABs. Cubs need pitching and could use Pillar better than we are. Seems like a perfect fit for what they want/do. They also won't be using Happ everyday for a few years it seems.

 

Almora/Pillar and Happ in a closed rotation when Darvish is back? For Happ in our loaded 2nd base and OF?:confused:

Jays Centre Contributor
Posted
Almora/Pillar and Happ in a closed rotation when Darvish is back? For Happ in our loaded 2nd base and OF?:confused:

 

How the heck are we loaded in the OF without Pillar next year, Granderson, Pearce will probably not be here or if they are will be bench players at best. Happ is better than Alford and Teoscar imo. Grichuk is a complete wildcard who could be just filler or could be back into great form. Total toss up. Give Happ is basically Moncada right now imo.

 

Cubs are lacking quality pitching imo. Happ would be their 2nd best pitcher probably even with Darvish healthy. They have quantity for sure. Just not all that good imo, especially to make it to the World Series.

Posted
How the heck are we loaded in the OF without Pillar next year, Granderson, Pearce will probably not be here or if they are will be bench players at best. Happ is better than Alford and Teoscar imo. Grichuk is a complete wildcard who could be just filler or could be back into great form. Total toss up. Give Happ is basically Moncada right now imo.

 

Cubs are lacking quality pitching imo. Happ would be their 2nd best pitcher probably even with Darvish healthy. They have quantity for sure. Just not all that good imo, especially to make it to the World Series.

 

You'd think we're rebuilding with fellas around the same numbers.

Posted

Jays should be seeking pitching prospects, regardless.

 

Burnes from the brew crew, Abreu from the yanks, Ian Anderson from the braves, guys of that ilk

Verified Member
Posted

Starting pitching market this deadline is awful. Happ actually may be the best available starter unless the Mets decide to trade DeGrom or Syndergaard. Besides Happ, you're looking at guys like Hamels and Tyson Ross.

 

After getting Teoscar for Liriano and Pannone and Samad Taylor for Joe Smith, I'm pretty confident that whatever trades we make are gonna be pretty good for us.

Posted
Jays should be seeking pitching prospects, regardless.

 

Burnes from the brew crew, Abreu from the yanks, Ian Anderson from the braves, guys of that ilk

 

I think we should be seeking whoever is the best player, regardless of position, and quality over quantity even if we have to eat all Happ's contract.

Posted
I think we should be seeking whoever is the best player, regardless of position, and quality over quantity even if we have to eat all Happ's contract.

 

Agreed, but lean towards pitching

Posted

Jonah Kerri seems to think if JD goes on one of his usual MVP type tears, he could net us Mike Soroka.

 

If that somehow happened, I'd lose it with joy.

Posted
Jays should be seeking pitching prospects, regardless.

 

Burnes from the brew crew, Abreu from the yanks, Ian Anderson from the braves, guys of that ilk

 

Yeah no f*** pitching prospects, just get the best that's available, and honestly, hopefully it's not a pitching prospect.

Posted
Jonah Kerri seems to think if JD goes on one of his usual MVP type tears, he could net us Mike Soroka.

 

If that somehow happened, I'd lose it with joy.

 

lol I'd lower my expectations

Posted
Jonah Kerri seems to think if JD goes on one of his usual MVP type tears, he could net us Mike Soroka.

 

If that somehow happened, I'd lose it with joy.

 

I've read similar s***, if he does.

Posted
Jays should be seeking pitching prospects, regardless.

 

Burnes from the brew crew, Abreu from the yanks, Ian Anderson from the braves, guys of that ilk

 

Why? Why not BPA?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...