glory Old-Timey Member Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 I don't think hitting Tulo 8th is the answer. The Cito Gaston approach is to give players the lineup spot they deserve. RESPECT Pillar Martin Donaldson Bautista EE Tulo Saunders Smoak Goins Pillar hits a bit better because he is up front, Donaldson, Bautista, EE, Tulo are close enough to middle of the order that they feel comfortable and respected. It all be ********. My post was an attempt to appease the Baseball God's by emulating Ned Yost. I don't actually think Tulo should be batting 8th or Pillar should be leading off.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 I feel like it could very easily be Saunders/Pompey leading off if Travis isn't ready. Pillar has the highest career on base percentage of those 3 guys, .303 to .301 to .295 Pillar has the lowest minor league on base percentage, but not by much .370 to .370 to .360 One could argue that all 3 would put up around .320 next year, the projections probably say that, or .310 Barring anybody having issues and suck attacks the most runs would be scored with the folllowing line up Bautista Donaldon EE Tulo Martin Saunders Smoak Pillar Goins
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 Bautista is ideal but I doubt he wants to do it. My guess is it will be Travis if healthy.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 Bautista is ideal but I doubt he wants to do it. My guess is it will be Travis if healthy. The premise is that Travis won't be healthy for the first month So maybe it should be Martin, If Bautista won't do it then why should Tulo?? The other choices are Saunders, Pillar, Goins, Smoak, all of who have sub .310 career on base averages. Martin hasn't been a consistent power threat... he's like had solid 10 homer 55 rbi seasons sometimes, 20 70 other years. So it's kind of dumb, but Martin isn't losing his 100 rbis over this, since he's only going to have 60-75 anyway... so out of the guys with .350+ on base percentages he gets to do it.
BTS Community Moderator Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 So the new thing on this forum is saying objectively stupid things and then using as a defense: "I think this will make the team more comfortable"?
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 So the new thing on this forum is saying objectively stupid things and then using as a defense: "I think this will make the team more comfortable"? And then pretend the reason you said it wasn't actually the reason you said it before getting butthurt.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 Reposting, optimal lineups using steamer projections. Every lineup three things in common. Bautista 1, Eddy 4, and Goins 8. Many had Martin 9th, surprisingly. 5.074 Jose Bautista Josh Donaldson Russell Martin Edwin Encarnacion Troy Tulowitzki Chris Colabello Kevin Pillar Ryan Goins Michael Saunders 5.190 Jose Bautista Josh Donaldson Russell Martin Edwin Encarnacion Troy Tulowitzki Chris Colabello Devon Travis Kevin Pillar Michael Saunders
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 FTR: Now 2 votes for Ryan Goins to hit leadoff
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 I find it weird that saskjaysfan isn't campaigning for Colabello to lead off. He could use a confidence boost too and likely sports a better OBP. I think if you said to Colabello "hey kid, we believe in you. Bat leadoff." He'll probably OBP around .380 and gain the ability to run faster.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 No... because he isn't a very good hitter. Not sure what the point of this question is The reason why I brought that up is that Pillar's offensive profile is very similar to Perez's. He's a lot faster and has less power, but there are lots of similarities there, as both have good bat control but are full free swingers.
puphood Verified Member Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 5.074 Jose Bautista Josh Donaldson Russell Martin Edwin Encarnacion Troy Tulowitzki Chris Colabello Kevin Pillar Ryan Goins Michael Saunders Move Martin for Colabello, and if if if Saunders makes the cut also this could work till Travis comes back.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 I find it weird that saskjaysfan isn't campaigning for Colabello to lead off. He could use a confidence boost too and likely sports a better OBP. I think if you said to Colabello "hey kid, we believe in you. Bat leadoff." He'll probably OBP around .380 and gain the ability to run faster. that's exactly what I was just thinking. Now I don't have to make that post...thanks bro
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 The numbers in these projections are what - expected average number of runs scored per game?
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 The numbers in these projections are what - expected average number of runs scored per game? That's correct. Don't read too much into them though. Steamer projects pretty significant from everyone but Pillar if I remember correctly. It also doesn't account for bench players, injuries, etc.
BillBucknorslegs Verified Member Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 Is it too late to vote for Macier Izturis?
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Rickey Henderson 1990: .325/.439/.577 Troy Tulowitzki 2014: .340/.432/.603 Why is this even a debate? If the whole theory of the lead off man is to get on base as often as possible so other hitters can drive him in, Tulowitzki is the one with the best skill set of being able to get on base without blasting 40+ home runs in the process. JB, JD and EE, you kind of want them coming up with guys on base sometimes.
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Pompey makes a great #9 hitter. The only difference between #9 and #1 is that #9 will get one less AB during the course of the game about 90% of the time. The flow would be the exact same once the game gets past the first inning with Pompey as #1 and Tulo as #2 if you want to view it that way. So why about a quarter of you people want to gift an extra AB to an untested rookie at the expense of five proven all-stars is confusing to me.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Pompey makes a great #9 hitter. The only difference between #9 and #1 is that #9 will get one less AB during the course of the game about 90% of the time. The flow would be the exact same once the game gets past the first inning with Pompey as #1 and Tulo as #2 if you want to view it that way. So why about a quarter of you people want to gift an extra AB to an untested rookie at the expense of five proven all-stars is confusing to me. A third of my posts on this forum are me bitching about this exact thing.
BigCecil Old-Timey Member Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Pompey makes a great #9 hitter. The only difference between #9 and #1 is that #9 will get one less AB during the course of the game about 90% of the time. The flow would be the exact same once the game gets past the first inning with Pompey as #1 and Tulo as #2 if you want to view it that way. So why about a quarter of you people want to gift an extra AB to an untested rookie at the expense of five proven all-stars is confusing to me. A third of my posts on this forum are me bitching about this exact thing. I third that motion.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 I'll laugh if Cola puts up similar numbers to last year but with more plate appearances. Like .900 Ops in 500 PA What will the Sabermatics monkeys say then. Probably some more pseudoscience like swing o rate or some nonsense. How about some variance analysis for 2015 actuals vs projections
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 A third of my posts on this forum are me bitching about this exact thing. Fight the good fight! With the offensive depth that the Jays have, this should not even be in a discussion. It's not like the choice is between him and Mike McCoy. Travis should be in the same boat, but his one month of MLB dominance will put him in the top of the order discussion as well. Really those two guys should be #8 and #9.
Zaun of the Dead Verified Member Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 I say f*** it and experiment with bello batting leadoff
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 I'll laugh if Cola puts up similar numbers to last year but with more plate appearances. Like .900 Ops in 500 PA What will the Sabermatics monkeys say then. Probably some more pseudoscience like swing o rate or some nonsense. How about some variance analysis for 2015 actuals vs projections I'm really pulling for him. I would love it if that happened!
Moo3 Verified Member Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 It's underestimated just how valuable an OBP guy is infront of Jose, Edwin, JD. Pompey may have the potential to be that guy but he's certainly not there yet.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted February 2, 2016 Posted February 2, 2016 I'll laugh if Cola puts up similar numbers to last year but with more plate appearances. Like .900 Ops in 500 PA What will the Sabermatics monkeys say then. Probably some more pseudoscience like swing o rate or some nonsense. How about some variance analysis for 2015 actuals vs projections It's crazy how uneducated our society is... people don't understand basic concepts like long term averages... Cola lifetime average is .265, with a .323 on base, and a .438 slugging... It isn't rocket science, most guys will hit their life time averages next year, if they are young they might improve a bit, if they are old they might decline. It is very simple, Cola will hit his lifetime average. No need for advance stats. The advanced stats guys might take a deeper look... just to see if there is anything in there that indicates he is better then his lifetime averages... they didn't find anything...
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 Lots of silent votes for Pompey I'd LOVE to see Pompey (or Travis for that matter) become a good enough OBP guy for that to make sense, but no way do I start the season with him in that role even if he's hot in spring training. He'd have to earn it over a few months from the 9 spot IYAM.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 s*** though, Pompey's walk rates and OBP have pretty damn good throughout his minor league career...
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 I think seeing a batting order written out is a bit of an illusion. A beefy 2-6 looks a lot more "balanced" than a beefy 1-5, which just looks top-heavy and bottom-weak by comparison. Problem is that the lineups are weak in exactly the same ways, except the Pompey-leading-off version gives Pompey more PAs than Josh Donaldson. It's like people forget the lineup loops overs and you get the same effect of Pompey hitting in front of sluggers if he hits ninth. This is my armchair psychology for the day.
intrigid Verified Member Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 Yeah, lineups are SUPPOSED to be top heavy, not "balanced" like it's a goddamned seesaw. Seriously we knew this in the 1800s. Even an infant would understand the logic of this. So why not sports writers and managers?
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 (edited) Lots of silent votes for Pompey I'd LOVE to see Pompey (or Travis for that matter) become a good enough OBP guy for that to make sense, but no way do I start the season with him in that role even if he's hot in spring training. He'd have to earn it over a few months from the 9 spot IYAM. s*** though, Pompey's walk rates and OBP have pretty damn good throughout his minor league career... Oh yeah, especially last season. He OBP'd close to .400 across AA and AAA with a BB% of 12. That would be excellent for a lead-off hitter, if he was able to translate some of that to the Majors. I'd say start him in the 9th spot and if his OBP, BB%, etc are pretty good after April, then put him in the leadoff spot. That said, if Travis is back by then, he could easily slide into that spot as well. I would just use Martin until then, if Tulo really does have a psychological "comfort" issue with batting leadoff (as weird as that would be). Edited February 3, 2016 by THANOS
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now