Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
To play devil's advocate for a minute though...Edwin and Bautista both want to win and both were willing to defer salary to get Santana a few years ago. Possible they could give a hometown discount if the team is in any position to win.

 

But, maybe, just maybe..... They never will win in the Jays uniform.

Posted
For some reason if Shapiro decides not to sign him what kind of return could we get if we traded him? Any sort of starting pitcher or relief arms?
Posted
They already both gave a discount. Bautista's was a bit more reasonable, considering he had one great year.

 

But Edwin for some reason took a very undermarket deal. He deserves to be paid.

 

at the time of signing there was no Discount at all on either. Neither player had shown any consistency, and in fact Edwin

had been DFA a couple of times. AA took a flyer on both players, offered them contracts that set both players for life, and

both happily accepted.

it turned out to be great signings for both players, and AA. It was win/win.

Posted
For some reason if Shapiro decides not to sign him what kind of return could we get if we traded him? Any sort of starting pitcher or relief arms?

 

palm to face. F

Posted
For some reason if Shapiro decides not to sign him what kind of return could we get if we traded him? Any sort of starting pitcher or relief arms?

 

Edwin + TuloMoney for something aceptable.

Posted
But if this is true, do we trade him now and get all we can for him! Now ?

 

He's not going to accept a trade. Maybe he would midseason since it wouldn't attach the QO to him but he knows RC is a great place to hit.

Posted

don't most players want contract stuff dealt with in the offseason anyway? This doesn't seem like news to me - most players don't want the distraction of a contract negotiation in the middle of a season.

 

It's in Edwins best interest to get locked up before the season starts, before he possibly gets hurt or not playing well.

Community Moderator
Posted
Tbh I am having a hard time picturing Bautista playing anywhere else.

 

http://blogimages.thescore.com/mlb/files/2012/02/bautista-royals-orioles.jpg

Posted
http://blogimages.thescore.com/mlb/files/2012/02/bautista-royals-orioles.jpg

 

Holee f*** you are so stchewpid

Posted
I think it was common knowledge that it would come down to Bautista and Encarnacion after this upcoming season. It would suck absolutely if he went to Boston though.
Posted

Ben Nicholson-Smith

#BlueJays expect Jose Bautista to do what he does offensively for "quite a while" per Tony LaCava

 

 

Goodbye Edwin

Posted
Is there a reason to think EE can't hit late in to his career like Ortiz has? I know he gets banged up but he still hits the cover off the ball and might continue to do that in his late 30s as an exclusive DH.
Posted
Is there a reason to think EE can't hit late in to his career like Ortiz has? I know he gets banged up but he still hits the cover off the ball and might continue to do that in his late 30s as an exclusive DH.

 

I don't think you can write EE from 34-37, anything past that might be questionable. I just don't think it's feasible to keep EE and JB when they both need to DH/1B.

Posted

Is there any upside in this for the Jays when it comes to Bautista and Encarnacion?

 

If they sign one or both, then they will be paying them free agent money in their mid to late-30's while their defensive value ceases to exist (if it hasn't already). Any time you pay someone big money for what they did in the past, rather than what can be reasonably projected in the future, it becomes a huge risk.

 

If they lose both, then that's about a 9-10 WAR for $24m that they will no longer have. The surplus value is gone and it will surely take way more than $24m to find replacements anywhere near as good as them.

 

Can't trade them due to 10/5 rights and they have no incentive to accept trades elsewhere when they know they play in a park suited for their strengths.

 

So it's either lose both and be stuck having to replace them, or keep one/both and pay two DH's $20m a year during what could be their twilight years. Not an enviable spot to be in.

Posted
Is there any upside in this for the Jays when it comes to Bautista and Encarnacion?

 

If they sign one or both, then they will be paying them free agent money in their mid to late-30's while their defensive value ceases to exist (if it hasn't already). Any time you pay someone big money for what they did in the past, rather than what can be reasonably projected in the future, it becomes a huge risk.

 

If they lose both, then that's about a 9-10 WAR for $24m that they will no longer have. The surplus value is gone and it will surely take way more than $24m to find replacements anywhere near as good as them.

 

Can't trade them due to 10/5 rights and they have no incentive to accept trades elsewhere when they know they play in a park suited for their strengths.

 

So it's either lose both and be stuck having to replace them, or keep one/both and pay two DH's $20m a year during what could be their twilight years. Not an enviable spot to be in.

 

well karma is a bitch. We were able to take advantage of two guys we got for cheap, signed for cheap and produced at elite levels.

Posted
Is there any upside in this for the Jays when it comes to Bautista and Encarnacion?

 

Older players accept shorter contracts so the amount of risk you take isn't necessarily any greater than with younger players. It all depends on the terms really. The Jays aren't necessarily in a bad position here. The opportunity to sign core pieces to shorter terms doesn't come along very often but EE and JB are the rare players that have the kind of bats that can carry them even when they lose nearly all defensive value. Given that the Jays probably don't want to make any big long term deals, these players might arguably be the ideal ones with which to have an exclusive negotiation window. Another thing that works to the Jays favour is that the two bats are eerily similar. Even if they might have a slight preference for Jose, they'll probably be very content with either one. Assuming that they sign one but not both, they'd probably look to make up some of the lost value by bringing in someone who will contribute more to run prevention.

Posted
Bobcat was talking to Jamie Campbell about this matter last night (re-signing EE & Jose) and Jamie commented on how much defense that Jose brings to the table. Funny stuff.
Posted

Bautista and EE split 1B duties. Both guys are likely to be worth 60/3 or maybe 80/4.

 

Also, I would definitely reward Bautista for how well he takes care of his body. I disliked Bautista so much at first but now I can't imagine the team without him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...