Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Terminator said:
  • Jurrangelo is the switch-pitcher who has made some Top 100 lists.
  • Tai Peete is a power-hitting CF prospect with high boom/bust potential.
  • And then Williamson who is an elite glove 3B that can't really hit. 

50 FV, 40+ FV, 40 FV for two years of Donovan seems like an overpay by the M's.*

*If the Jays made a similar deal I probably would have praised the move as a heist

Is that Longenhagen's FV numbers? He's super conservative. BA's numbers are much higher. But then again those numbers are outdated(FG's). BA has a 55 on Clintje, 60 on Peete and 40 on Willyson. 😜

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Stangstag said:

Im a big Suarez fan, but he’s getting up there in age and there’s been questions about the defense lately.

Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds?  Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now?

Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment.  But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team.

Community Moderator
Posted
21 minutes ago, Brownie19 said:

Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds?  Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now?

Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment.  But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team.

Per MLB Radio host who spoke with Reds' president of baseball ops: "Primary DH"

Posted
35 minutes ago, Brownie19 said:

Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds?  Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now?

Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment.  But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team.

Yeah good comp, Teo/Santander/Suarez are all pretty similar with the bat.

Posted
7 hours ago, Spanky__99 said:

And? They're very similar hitters guy, Geno's DHing and periodically playing the corners is what was reported yesterday. Again, Santander is 3 years younger.

 

5 hours ago, Brownie19 said:

Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds?  Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now?

Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment.  But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team.

Per the GM of the Reds.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

I think Santander’s age played some role, but not nearly as big as people are making it out to be when comparing his deal to what Suarez got. 

Timing mattered a lot for Santander. Last offseason was pretty thin for impact bats after Soto, so teams needing offense like the Jays didn’t have many alternatives. That scarcity definitely helped push his market. In 2024, Santander hit 44 HR with 100+ RBI and did it as a switch hitter, which matters a lot when you’re talking lineup flexibility and matchups. 

The Jays also probably had to go five years instead of three or four on Santander because it’s Toronto - they were coming off a losing season, and there was real uncertainty around Vlad at the time.

This offseason was much deeper, with more corner OF/DH options and bounce-back types available, so leverage is spread out more. If he hit free agency this year instead of last, the deal probably looks shorter and/or cheaper.

Posted
12 hours ago, jaysblue said:

Yeah figured Suarez would have to settle for only a one-year deal, especially at this point. Great value for a guy who has pretty much averaged 3-4 WAR per season. 

Would have been a nice fit on the Jays, but 3B and DH overcrowded already with Okamoto/Santander/Springer. 

Suarez was offered 2 years by the Pirates at least that we know of.  He chose 1 year with a known org instead.

Posted
1 hour ago, mphenhef said:

Suarez was offered 2 years by the Pirates at least that we know of.  He chose 1 year with a known org instead.

Also gotta look at the market this offseason. LOTS of guys taking 1yr deals or deals with opt outs after year 1/2. Probably has to do with the CBA uncertainty.

Community Moderator
Posted

Doesn't make sense to compare Santander and Suarez. Every FA market is its own context. 

Santander was projected for 4/$80m and got 5/$68.6m, as a 30 year old. It was not a bad contract at all, they weren't paying him to be that good, maybe hoping for a 2 win player for 3 years. Obviously year 1 went as bad as possible lol.

Suarez was projected for 3/$60m and got 1/$15m but probably turned down something like 2/$30m from the Pirates. At 34 years old. 

Interesting to see that all of Suarez's projections have nose-dived as he is a DH on the depth chart now. Not a single 2 WAR projection. 

It's pretty clear that teams think he is a butcher at 3B. So there is big disconnect between his expected 2026 value and his 2025 and prior WARs. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted

The Jays value defense and contact more than most teams, so I don’t think they would have been in on Suarez either way. The only hacker on the team is Varsho and he plays elite CF defense, and the only poor defensive player is Santander and he puts the ball in play (typically) a lot more.

I think it’s fair to say that if Atkins could have one back, he’d definitely pass on Santander last winter. They clearly expected Springer to play the OF a lot more than he did, but now that he’s firmly a DH, it makes Tony’s fit on this roster a lot more clunky. With that said, the contract isn’t terrible due to the deferrals. Just have to hope he has a couple of 30-40 HR seasons left in him. 

Posted
12 hours ago, G-Snarls said:

Per MLB Radio host who spoke with Reds' president of baseball ops: "Primary DH"

I suspect most teams no longer view him as a full time 3rd baseman - which is why his market wasn't as strong.

Posted
2 hours ago, mphenhef said:

Suarez was offered 2 years by the Pirates at least that we know of.  He chose 1 year with a known org instead.

That's good to know.  I like seeing Pittsburgh and Cincy making efforts to sign guys like this.

Posted
12 hours ago, Stangstag said:

Yeah good comp, Teo/Santander/Suarez are all pretty similar with the bat.

Santander is a little different in that he doesn't strike out as much - he isn't 27%+ K rates like Teo/Suarez

Posted
1 hour ago, Brownie19 said:

Santander is a little different in that he doesn't strike out as much - he isn't 27%+ K rates like Teo/Suarez

Which is exactly why this FO prioritized him over those guys. Plus he’s a switch hitter which is nice

Community Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, glory said:

The Jays value defense and contact more than most teams, so I don’t think they would have been in on Suarez either way. The only hacker on the team is Varsho and he plays elite CF defense, and the only poor defensive player is Santander and he puts the ball in play (typically) a lot more.

I think it’s fair to say that if Atkins could have one back, he’d definitely pass on Santander last winter. They clearly expected Springer to play the OF a lot more than he did, but now that he’s firmly a DH, it makes Tony’s fit on this roster a lot more clunky. With that said, the contract isn’t terrible due to the deferrals. Just have to hope he has a couple of 30-40 HR seasons left in him. 

Agreed. Jays would not have been interested in Suarez or Arraez 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
On 2/2/2026 at 8:32 PM, Stangstag said:

30 yrs old vs 34, are you restarted my dude?

I don't give a s*** about the age of a player who is signed to a one year deal lol. I just think its crazy Geno got that in comparison.

Posted

Fangraphs have the M's as the beasts of the AL...

 

AL East

                           
  2026 Results 2026 Projections
Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L ROS W% Strength of Sched Win Div Clinch Bye Clinch Wild Card Make Playoffs Win WS
Yankees 0 0 .000 0.0 86.2 75.8 .532 .502 30.8% 26.3% 38.4% 69.2% 5.8%
Blue Jays 0 0 .000 0.0 84.9 77.1 .524 .503 23.4% 19.6% 38.1% 61.5% 4.7%
Red Sox 0 0 .000 0.0 84.9 77.1 .524 .504 23.2% 19.8% 38.6% 61.8% 5.0%
Orioles 0 0 .000 0.0 83.8 78.2 .517 .502 18.4% 15.4% 35.7% 54.1% 3.4%
Rays 0 0 .000 0.0 77.9 84.1 .481 .505 4.2% 3.2% 16.8% 21.0% 0.6%

AL Central

                           
  2026 Results 2026 Projections
Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L ROS W% Strength of Sched Win Div Clinch Bye Clinch Wild Card Make Playoffs Win WS
Tigers 0 0 .000 0.0 84.2 77.8 .520 .495 46.0% 23.8% 15.3% 61.4% 4.0%
Royals 0 0 .000 0.0 81.1 80.9 .501 .496 25.9% 11.6% 15.4% 41.4% 1.8%
Twins 0 0 .000 0.0 80.1 81.9 .494 .497 20.2% 8.7% 14.7% 35.0% 1.5%
Guardians 0 0 .000 0.0 75.6 86.4 .467 .499 7.2% 2.3% 6.8% 14.1% 0.4%
White Sox 0 0 .000 0.0 67.9 94.1 .419 .503 0.6% 0.1% 0.7% 1.2% 0.0%

AL West

                           
  2026 Results 2026 Projections
Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L ROS W% Strength of Sched Win Div Clinch Bye Clinch Wild Card Make Playoffs Win WS
Mariners 0 0 .000 0.0 87.7 74.3 .541 .496 59.0% 44.4% 18.8% 77.9% 8.5%
Astros 0 0 .000 0.0 81.3 80.7 .502 .498 17.3% 11.1% 22.4% 39.7% 1.8%
Rangers 0 0 .000 0.0 80.0 82.0 .494 .500 13.0% 7.9% 19.4% 32.4% 1.3%
Athletics 0 0 .000 0.0 78.3 83.7 .483 .501 8.9% 5.1% 14.4% 23.3% 0.8%
Angels 0 0 .000 0.0 72.9 89.1 .450 .505 1.7% 0.8% 4.3% 6.1% 0.1%
 
 
Posted

Zips for the East...

 

ZiPS Projections – AL East Median Standings (1/29)
Team W L GB Pct Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win% 80th 20th
Toronto Blue Jays 90 72 .556 32.1% 40.5% 72.6% 4.8% 99.8 82.9
Boston Red Sox 90 72 .556 25.8% 46.7% 72.5% 4.9% 97.7 83.2
Baltimore Orioles 88 74 2 .543 22.2% 39.5% 61.7% 5.8% 97.3 79.8
New York Yankees 87 75 3 .537 18.9% 41.4% 60.3% 5.4% 96.0 79.7
Tampa Bay Rays 75 87 15 .463 1.1% 10.6% 11.7% 0.5% 82.6 67.5
Posted
5 hours ago, Spanky__99 said:

Zips for the East...

 

ZiPS Projections – AL East Median Standings (1/29)
Team W L GB Pct Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win% 80th 20th
Toronto Blue Jays 90 72 .556 32.1% 40.5% 72.6% 4.8% 99.8 82.9
Boston Red Sox 90 72 .556 25.8% 46.7% 72.5% 4.9% 97.7 83.2
Baltimore Orioles 88 74 2 .543 22.2% 39.5% 61.7% 5.8% 97.3 79.8
New York Yankees 87 75 3 .537 18.9% 41.4% 60.3% 5.4% 96.0 79.7
Tampa Bay Rays 75 87 15 .463 1.1% 10.6% 11.7% 0.5% 82.6 67.5

Yankees 4th lol wow. This division man…

Posted
14 hours ago, Jonn said:

I don't give a s*** about the age of a player who is signed to a one year deal lol. I just think its crazy Geno got that in comparison.

Ok… but every front office does. That’s why the context of age matters when comparing deals.

Community Moderator
Posted
14 hours ago, Jonn said:

I don't give a s*** about the age of a player who is signed to a one year deal lol. I just think its crazy Geno got that in comparison.

Silly opinion though. 

Aging curves get steeper as players get older! The expected decline is more intense AND there is a higher risk every year of completely being done. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
4 hours ago, Laika said:

Silly opinion though. 

Aging curves get steeper as players get older! The expected decline is more intense AND there is a higher risk every year of completely being done. 

I don’t think Santander gets a one year 15 million dollar deal right now regardless of age. He might be 4 years younger. He certainly doesn’t look or play it. Had every injury under the sun last year.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
10 minutes ago, Terminator said:

We need a complete and total shutdown of this entire organization until we can figure out what the hell is going on.

Why what does this have anything to do with Baseball? Do you think they spent it on Kyle Tucker instead lol?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...