Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

I find it interesting that most seem to favor Ray over Matz on this board.

 

I believe I said that if Ray could ever get his BB/9 below 2.5 that he's be a CY Young candidate.....well he's done that and while the current results have been good, there are underlying issues (BABIP allowed is low, LOB% very high - although the HR/FB should also come down). He only has 0.1 WAR so far, whereas Matz is at 0.8.

 

I mean we have to be super happy with both so far this year and I could see us wanting to keep both to be honest.

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I find it interesting that most seem to favor Ray over Matz on this board.

 

I believe I said that if Ray could ever get his BB/9 below 2.5 that he's be a CY Young candidate.....well he's done that and while the current results have been good, there are underlying issues (BABIP allowed is low, LOB% very high - although the HR/FB should also come down). He only has 0.1 WAR so far, whereas Matz is at 0.8.

 

I mean we have to be super happy with both so far this year and I could see us wanting to keep both to be honest.

 

Ray is rated very well by SIERA and xFIP which I think I read somewhere(probably on this forum) that it's more predictive than FIP which is what fWAR is based on?

Posted
Bo, Vlad, Ray, Matz and Semien would all be worthy of consideration. I might consider Chatwood as well but my guess is he'll want to test the market after recently reinventing himself.
Posted

After thinking about this some more, Bo and Vlad are the most obvious but would take a ton of years and dollars.

 

Semien could be a smart guy to extend. Groshans and Martin aren't too far away but Biggio is looking more like a good utility bench player to me. Infield depth has haunted this team forever. I can't even think of the last time we had good depth there.

 

Given his soft market last year, a 4 for 70-75 or something like that for Semien could get it done to lock him up through his age 31 to 34 seasons. He'd project to start out as a 4+ WAR player at age 31 but would eventually settle in as a 2-3 WAR guy by the contract's end.

 

If he continues to play like a Top 10 MVP guy like in 2019 and 2021 in his early 30's and in that case he'd provide plenty of surplus.

Posted
Semien hasn't even seen the city of Toronto yet, and probably won't this year given our governments incompetence. I'd wager it will take a significant overpay to entice him to stay, especially if he continues to play well. The market for him will be broader than the top SS FAs, as most teams won't even entertain the type of of money/length of contract said FAs will garner.
Posted

Vladdy and Bo are obvious choices, but can wait a bit.

 

If Semien is still performing well by the All Star break, I would consider tossing a 3/60 at him and see what happens.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Other than the obvious (Vlad/Bo), I'd only consider Semien. I'm still not sold on Ray/Matz as long term pieces. Semien at this rate is going to end up being a top 10 player in WAR this season, just like he was in the last 162 game season, and he still seems under the radar enough to not be paid like a true star (his age will make him cheaper as well). He will likely still get a big contract, so obviously cost/term will factor in to how much bringing him back makes sense for the Jays, but out of the extension candidates not named Bo/Vlad, he's the only one I think the Jays should consider. Wait it out with Teoscar.
Posted
Bo, Vlad, Ray, Matz and Semien would all be worthy of consideration. I might consider Chatwood as well but my guess is he'll want to test the market after recently reinventing himself.

 

Well now would be the time to strike if you wanted a good deal on chatwood.

Posted
Does 10/250 get it done for Vladdy today?

 

Considering Tatis as the benchmark and comparable, no way.

 

He's very likely looking for 300+ million

Posted
Considering Tatis as the benchmark and comparable, no way.

 

He's very likely looking for 300+ million

 

Acuna 10/124

 

Lets meet in the middle haha.

 

Damn that Acuna contract is robbery, he’s gonna be the most underpaid player in baseball for quite some time

Posted
would Vlad Jr sign a 10 year deal? Feels sub-optimal for him to re-up at age 32/33. I'm guessing he and his agent would look for either 7 years or 15 years. My offer would be something like 7/190 or 15/400. I'd probably just offer the 15 year deal and take the risk - I can't see this bat regressing below a .300-30-100 clip even as he approaches his mid-30s. Will have to DH him in his latter years, but the first 10 years of his contract could be legendary
Community Moderator
Posted (edited)
Acuna 10/124

 

Lets meet in the middle haha.

 

Damn that Acuna contract is robbery, he’s gonna be the most underpaid player in baseball for quite some time

 

That's what I'm thinking too

 

Something in between

 

10-12 years for 260-280M

 

Vlad is an amazing hitter. But he isn't a gold glove potential shortstop.

Edited by G-Snarls
Posted
would Vlad Jr sign a 10 year deal? Feels sub-optimal for him to re-up at age 32/33. I'm guessing he and his agent would look for either 7 years or 15 years. My offer would be something like 7/190 or 15/400. I'd probably just offer the 15 year deal and take the risk - I can't see this bat regressing below a .300-30-100 clip even as he approaches his mid-30s. Will have to DH him in his latter years, but the first 10 years of his contract could be legendary

 

I'd rather do the 7/8 year deal, long enough to capture most of the prime years, and not so long that it does not become immovable if it is in the Jays best interests to move him.

Posted
Considering Tatis as the benchmark and comparable, no way.

 

He's very likely looking for 300+ million

 

Tatis and acuna have speed and play premier positions though .... tatis plays Short stop and is gold glove potential.

Posted
That's what I'm thinking too

 

Something in between

 

10-12 years for 260-280M

 

Vlad is an amazing hitter. But he isn't a gold glove potential shortstop.

 

This.

Posted
That's what I'm thinking too

 

Something in between

 

10-12 years for 260-280M

 

Vlad is an amazing hitter. But he isn't a gold glove potential shortstop.

 

Does Gold Glove winning 1B count for anything?

Community Moderator
Posted
Does Gold Glove winning 1B count for anything?

 

not much, especially when the player, you know, hasn't won a a gold glove

Posted
not much, especially when the player, you know, hasn't won a a gold glove

 

I get that....I'm playing the crystal ball game. If his defense does continue to improve at its current rate and he does get to that elite D level, how does an elite defensive 1B compare to an elite defensive SS (value wise). Understand it's not the same in reality...but from a contractual standpoint, do you really think you'd see much of a difference?

Posted
Tatis and acuna have speed and play premier positions though .... tatis plays Short stop and is gold glove potential.

 

I love Tatis - he's the new face of baseball and maybe one day his defense will catch up with everything else he dominates at. But he's the worst defensive shortstop in baseball right now. 15 errors in 37 games. 36 errors in his 177 career games. Negative 3.1 defensive value on Fangraphs. He makes Bo Bichette look like Ozzie Smith right now and most here wanted Bo removed permanently from SS like 4 weeks ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...