Laika Community Moderator Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 36% K rate in A ball for a college prospect. I'll eat my dad's shorts if he's anything but an MLB role player
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 (edited) 40 FVs mean nothing. Preller signs like 3 of them every IFA period and trades them for Darvish. Arbitrary Fangraphs numbers mean nothing. You don't hang on to every prospect you think is likely to bust on the off off off off off off off chance that some other teams likes them a lot and you can package them with three other assets for a good player on a free agent contract Edit - I thought you were being sarcastic Edited January 3, 2021 by Laika
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Corner outfielders are the most replaceable position on the field. You could sign Robbie Grossman for like 6M this year if you wanted and could expect a 1-2 win player. There are guys like that available every single year. Who cares!
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Griffin Conine is a weird hill to die on Take a gander at MLB Pipeline's Blue Jays top 30. If you assume Martin plays infield Conine was basically the Jays top rated outfield prospect, this makes what is the arguably the minor league system's greatest weakness even worse. I just really dislike the idea of dumping prospects before they've even had a decent chance to fail and then subsequently make the necessary adjustments to maximize their talents.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Take a gander at MLB Pipeline's Blue Jays top 30. If you assume Martin plays infield Conine was basically the Jays top rated outfield prospect, this makes what is the arguably the minor league system's greatest weakness even worse. I just really dislike the idea of dumping prospects before they've even had a decent chance to fail and then subsequently make the necessary adjustments to maximize their talents. They're dime a dozen, man.
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Take a gander at MLB Pipeline's Blue Jays top 30. If you assume Martin plays infield Conine was basically the Jays top rated outfield prospect, this makes what is the arguably the minor league system's greatest weakness even worse. I just really dislike the idea of dumping prospects before they've even had a decent chance to fail and then subsequently make the necessary adjustments to maximize their talents. There's a very real chance that the reason why Toronto's system isn't loaded with OF prospects is because the team places an emphasis on infielders with the understanding that they can always move to the OF if the bat plays.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 There's a very real chance that the reason why Toronto's system isn't loaded with OF prospects is because the team places an emphasis on infielders with the understanding that they can always move to the OF if the bat plays. Never thought about it like that but this could be exactly right. Most outfielders are just baseball players who couldn't stick on the dirt. It's like saying "this system doesn't have enough reliever prospects!"
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Never thought about it like that but this could be exactly right. Most outfielders are just baseball players who couldn't stick on the dirt. Exactly. Unless you throw left handed if you ended up in the OF at any point in your baseball career you likely failed as an infielder.
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 There's a very real chance that the reason why Toronto's system isn't loaded with OF prospects is because the team places an emphasis on infielders with the understanding that they can always move to the OF if the bat plays. That's a very good point. I've wondered perhaps if Groshans could be moved to the outfield if necessary if there's not room on the infield once he's ready for MLB. I think another potential reason is that it's a bit difficult to find players with the requisite tools to play plus defence in the outfield who are also capable of actually hitting a baseball. So many of the raw toolsy prospects who are drafted as outfielders end up fizzling out in the minors, or can't hack it as major league regulars. Just for Jays instances alone Socrates Brito is a recent example, Anthony Alford comes to mind, DJ Davis is another who couldn't hack it in the lower minors.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Drafting guys that play in the middle of the diamond and moving them to the corners as they fill out and slow down is old as dirt.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Never thought about it like that but this could be exactly right. Most outfielders are just baseball players who couldn't stick on the dirt. It's like saying "this system doesn't have enough reliever prospects!" lol
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Drafting guys that play in the middle of the diamond and moving them to the corners as they fill out and slow down is old as dirt. Pussy!
jerb Verified Member Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 Joe DeMayo @PSLToFlushing On Baseball Night in NY, @Jim_Duquette says he has heard the #BlueJays have made an aggressive 5 year offer to George Springer. However, that offer is not in the $150M range so it still may be awhile
Jays24 Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2021 Author Posted January 4, 2021 Joe DeMayo @PSLToFlushing On Baseball Night in NY, @Jim_Duquette says he has heard the #BlueJays have made an aggressive 5 year offer to George Springer. However, that offer is not in the $150M range so it still may be awhile I think we're all happy it's not at the 5/150 range. 5/125 seems like where we're at. Unfortunately I think it might take 6/150 for us to beat the Mets.
RobinThicc Verified Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Yeah it'll probably take that 6th year to pry him away from the Mets. Maybe they'll be able to convince him this is a better situation for him. Fingers crossed.
RobinThicc Verified Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Convienent leak tho. Springers camp gets on NY radio essentially telling the Mets to up their offer through Duquette lol
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 The longer it goes without NYM signing Springer, the better I like the Jays chances.
Jays24 Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Author Posted January 5, 2021 The longer it goes without NYM signing Springer, the better I like the Jays chances. Ya, seems like Springer is giving the Mets all the chances to win this bidding war but the longer it takes, the more chance we might pull through here.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 I think we're all happy it's not at the 5/150 range. 5/125 seems like where we're at. Unfortunately I think it might take 6/150 for us to beat the Mets. Either that, or a club option buyout at 10-12 million.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Either that, or a club option buyout at 10-12 million. I think something like this...Maybe a mutual option.. Basically, between New York State taxes and Federal taxes, plus Ontario and Canada.. If it was a $9 million dollar difference, just to keep things simple lets take 50%. So, I don't think $4.5 moves the needle vs home team and Canada. Hence it would need to be a large enough amount after taxes etc to move the needle.. Which I estimate would be $10 MINIMUM and probably more..
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Yes, a club option with a buyout, and front loading the value, would make sense to lure Springer here. Something like $40, $35, $25, $20, $15, and option $15 (or $5 buyout)
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Yes, a club option with a buyout, and front loading the value, would make sense to lure Springer here. Something like $40, $35, $25, $20, $15, and option $15 (or $5 buyout) That makes sense, but when I see those numbers I wish we had damn grass in our OF!!
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 That makes sense, but when I see those numbers I wish we had damn grass in our OF!! I believe the NFL are going all turf as it's better for players. MLB to follow...
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 I believe the NFL are going all turf as it's better for players. MLB to follow... Turf technology has come a long way and turf is being replaced far more often. Day one of turf is far different than the same field 10 years later. Thankfully the Jays are replacing the turf this offseason, so we will have the best possible version of the turf day one of the season this year.
RobinThicc Verified Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 I believe the NFL are going all turf as it's better for players. MLB to follow... Well the NFLPA is asking owners to switch to natural grass if they have turf. https://apnews.com/article/nfl-football-archive-9b34d4402f2f82ae60708605f65aa560
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Well the NFLPA is asking owners to switch to natural grass if they have turf. https://apnews.com/article/nfl-football-archive-9b34d4402f2f82ae60708605f65aa560 Yup... I have heard this same tune about turf for 15-20 yrs now. This new turf is softer and yada, yada, yada... If you can do grass, do it! To me if you are talking about $150 m plus contract for an OF over 30, the ROI for grass install makes sense.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Yup... I have heard this same tune about turf for 15-20 yrs now. This new turf is softer and yada, yada, yada... If you can do grass, do it! To me if you are talking about $150 m plus contract for an OF over 30, the ROI for grass install makes sense.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Turf is an issue. Perception for players coming to TO and there is data as pointed out in the NFL article there is more injury risk. Not sure why this would not be/is not a consideration for a FA OF over 30 and a $150 m dollar investment?
LGBJ29 Verified Member Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Turf is an issue. Perception for players coming to TO and there is data as pointed out in the NFL article there is more injury risk. Not sure why this would not be/is not a consideration for a FA OF over 30 and a $150 m dollar investment? You do realize 3 more MLB teams installed turf prior to 2020 bringing the total to 5. One of whom was Texas in a brand new stadium. On top of that, with no proper drainage the cost of installing a grass system in the Rogers Centre is a lot more than people think, if it is even possible.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now