Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2021 Posted February 5, 2021 Boston paying us 16M a year to have Price beat them would be glorious! Weeee havvvvvvve aaaaa Wiiiiiinnneer!
glory Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2021 Posted February 5, 2021 If the Jays want to maintain flexibility to get in on next year's FA market, then Price even at half his salary ($16m) doesn't make sense in 2022 (it's fine in 2021). The Dodgers don't need him, and I'm sure they'd love to have $16m freed up in 2022 when they need to re-sign Seager.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2021 Posted February 5, 2021 If the Jays want to maintain flexibility to get in on next year's FA market, then Price even at half his salary ($16m) doesn't make sense in 2022 (it's fine in 2021). The Dodgers don't need him, and I'm sure they'd love to have $16m freed up in 2022 when they need to re-sign Seager. Sure it would, I can't see your point here? Our roster next season loses a lot of dough, and I'm sure Price and his price wouldn't cripple the Birds, like at all.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2021 Posted February 5, 2021 If the Jays want to maintain flexibility to get in on next year's FA market, then Price even at half his salary ($16m) doesn't make sense in 2022 (it's fine in 2021). The Dodgers don't need him, and I'm sure they'd love to have $16m freed up in 2022 when they need to re-sign Seager. The Jays have 65 million committed next year and probably about 10 mil in arb raises. Price's 16 mil would bring us to around 90 mil. There would still be plenty of payroll flexibility next year.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted February 6, 2021 Posted February 6, 2021 We'll likely get into this talk more as spring training gets rolling, but I feel like the Jays are pretty much destined to start the season with a 6 man rotation. We're stacking our bullpen with swing guys. Ryu has had injury issues and even last year we saw him take an extra day rest at least once. He actually prefers pitching on an extra day of rest. All arms are going to have to be protected after a short season, but especially a guy like Pearson. You're going to want to limit his innings. If we sign Paxton, he screams 6 man rotation. I guess time will tell.
Eat My Shatkins Verified Member Posted February 6, 2021 Posted February 6, 2021 We'll likely get into this talk more as spring training gets rolling, but I feel like the Jays are pretty much destined to start the season with a 6 man rotation. We're stacking our bullpen with swing guys. Ryu has had injury issues and even last year we saw him take an extra day rest at least once. He actually prefers pitching on an extra day of rest. All arms are going to have to be protected after a short season, but especially a guy like Pearson. You're going to want to limit his innings. If we sign Paxton, he screams 6 man rotation. I guess time will tell. I agree. Even without bringing in another starter (which I'm pretty sure they will) they have enough arms to roll out a 6 man rotation. 1. Ryu 2. Pearson 3. Ray 4. Matz 5. Stripling 6. Roark 7. Chatwood (multi inning guy for sure, can start as well) 8. Merryweather (I believe they said they want to stretch him out, maybe he's a multi inning guy this year?) 9. Kay (starting in AAA?) 10. Hatch (I believe they want to stretch him out? Starts in AAA?) 11. Thornton (Not sure when he's slated to return) 12. Zeuch (Starts in AAA) 13. Waguespack (Starts in AAA) 14. Murphy (Starts in AAA) Tons of depth, and lots of wild card type arms, and it's probably a good idea to spread the innings around given the light work load for everyone in 2020. If/when they bring in another starter (come on Paxton!) they can push Stripling or Roark to the pen to eat innings from there.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 6, 2021 Posted February 6, 2021 (edited) 6 man rotation If there's an off day you skip the next start for the 6th guy and you use him in relief that game or the day before instead Everyone gets 1 more day of rest before every start, your SP6 does't get so rusty but he still gets fewer innings overall. This had always made sense to me for a team lacking major SP punch. Edited February 6, 2021 by G-Snarls
jerb Verified Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Shi Davidi @ShiDavidi #BlueJays have shown interest in versatile switch hitter Marwin Gonzalez, per source. They’ve liked him in the past and he’s the type of universal adapter defender they often seek. Unclear if it’s just due diligence or more, amid club’s ongoing pursuit of pitching.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Shi Davidi @ShiDavidi #BlueJays have shown interest in versatile switch hitter Marwin Gonzalez, per source. They’ve liked him in the past and he’s the type of universal adapter defender they often seek. Unclear if it’s just due diligence or more, amid club’s ongoing pursuit of pitching. Yes please. A switch hitting bat that can play 3B is a nice fit for us.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Marwin Gonzalez would be the perfect bench infielder to give us some depth at a number of positions.
Jays24 Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 If we get Gonzalez, this might be the best bench we've had in recent memory. I'd be surprised if he couldn't find a role that would guarantee him more playing time though. Unless we're still trying to make a move for one of Teo/Gurriel/Biggio for a pitcher (Hendricks).
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Sell high on Teo for SP, sign Gonzalez?
Laika Community Moderator Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Sell high on Teo for SP, sign Gonzalez? No.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Sell high on Teo for SP, sign Gonzalez? No? You're not signing Marwin Gonzalez to supplant one of your full-time players. Aside from the corresponding 40-man roster decision a Marwin signing should be independent of any other moves to acquire pitching.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 No? You're not signing Marwin Gonzalez to supplant one of your full-time players. Aside from the corresponding 40-man roster decision a Marwin signing should be independent of any other moves to acquire pitching. You don't. Marwin becomes the 4th OF. Teo and a bit more returns a Marquez or whoever. Its a good sequence.
Hipfan Verified Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Only if the upgrade to pitching is greater than downgrade from Teo/Gurriel to Grichuk, who would become the starter in the OF,
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 Hopefully Marwin is not another fringy bench guy this fo picks up that ends up being garbage.
Ray Verified Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 You don't. Marwin becomes the 4th OF. Teo and a bit more returns a Marquez or whoever. Its a good sequence. I think you’re vastly overestimating how much value Teoscar Hernandez has. He’s not returning German Marquez with “a bit more”, not to mention the Rockies are dumb and still think they can compete so they’re not going to trade him. Marwin Gonzalez is literally just replacing Santiago Espinal on the depth chart. We’re a middle infield injury away from seeing Espinal get relatively significant reps. Can probably easily upgrade there.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 I think you’re vastly overestimating how much value Teoscar Hernandez has. He’s not returning German Marquez with “a bit more”, not to mention the Rockies are dumb and still think they can compete so they’re not going to trade him. Marwin Gonzalez is literally just replacing Santiago Espinal on the depth chart. We’re a middle infield injury away from seeing Espinal get relatively significant reps. Can probably easily upgrade there. So if takes more than "a bit more" fine. My opinion is dealing from a position of strength (position players) to improve a weakness (pitching) is appropriate. You could use a completely different narrative and state the Jays are a Ryu injury from having Ray as the No. 1 starter.
Jays24 Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 So if takes more than "a bit more" fine. My opinion is dealing from a position of strength (position players) to improve a weakness (pitching) is appropriate. You could use a completely different narrative and state the Jays are a Ryu injury from having Ray as the No. 1 starter. Ya I'm with you here. Our starting rotation is already a pile of turd mostly. Why wouldn't we want to trade from a position of strength to fill a weakness? Obviously we'd all prefer signing a free agent to avoid having to give up anything but if that fails then I'm on board with a move similar to this.
Laika Community Moderator Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 You don't. Marwin becomes the 4th OF. Teo and a bit more returns a Marquez or whoever. Its a good sequence. No, Marwin replaces Espinal.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 No, Marwin replaces Espinal. At what cost though? He made 12 mil and 9 mil the last 2 seasons. Does Marwin get 3 to 5 mil? I'd rather go cheap. Marwin's a better bat, but Espinal is probably a better base runner and defender. We need all our money to go into pitching at this point, not the bench. Go sign Paxton already!
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 You don't. Marwin becomes the 4th OF. Teo and a bit more returns a Marquez or whoever. Its a good sequence. I would say the ask on Marquez would be really high, but it's the Rockies, so who knows. I'd definitely check in on Marquez, Price, Castillo and Gray. We need to sort our starting pitching whether that's signing Paxton, Odorizzi, Walker or trading for a starter.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 If only there was something about the 2017 Astros that could explain the ridiculous outlier wRC+ for Marwin Gonzalez... Hrmmm... 2016: 89 2017: 144 2018: 104 2019: 93 I guess we'll never know why the only seasons where he posted a WAR above 1.4 were the seasons where the Astros were involved in a very public cheating scandal....
Jays24 Old-Timey Member Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 If only there was something about the 2017 Astros that could explain the ridiculous outlier wRC+ for Marwin Gonzalez... Hrmmm... 2016: 89 2017: 144 2018: 104 2019: 93 I guess we'll never know why the only seasons where he posted a WAR above 1.4 were the seasons where the Astros were involved in a very public cheating scandal.... So call up the man in white and let's do this lol
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 So call up the man in white and let's do this lol Need the trash can man
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 Need the trash can man Welcome to Marwin.
Laika Community Moderator Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 If only there was something about the 2017 Astros that could explain the ridiculous outlier wRC+ for Marwin Gonzalez... Hrmmm... 2016: 89 2017: 144 2018: 104 2019: 93 I guess we'll never know why the only seasons where he posted a WAR above 1.4 were the seasons where the Astros were involved in a very public cheating scandal.... He had a better wRC+ on the road in 2017 (150). I think he was just locked in that year. I doubt the trash can had a large effect on the final regular season numbers of the Astros.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 Welcome to Marwin. So many TV/book references tonight
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 He had a better wRC+ on the road in 2017 (150). I think he was just locked in that year. I doubt the trash can had a large effect on the final regular season numbers of the Astros. That's why Jose Altuve upgraded to a buzzer taped to his chest in 2019...
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now