Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well depending how much salary they are eating for Clay. The Red Sox just opened up room to sign Edwin.

 

That seems a strong possibility...makes me sick to my stomach

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
And of course the Phillies ate the entire contract. Expect to hear Edwin to the Red Sox soon.

 

Zero chance that happens. Sox only made the deal to get under the tax. Dombrowski is indicating no deals are imminent.

Posted
Are there seriously not boards for other teams with the same traffic and activity as this one?

 

Of course. We're not that special, it's not like we have a real life celebrity that posts on our board.

Posted
Also no way EE goes to Boston, imo. His options seem limited. If I had to put money on it, I would say Texas or Seattle

 

I disagree with this. DD hasn't been known to be a passive pussy.

Posted

I think Detroit is another logical landing spot for Edwin, so Ilich can try for his World Series before it's too late.

I know there currently isn't anywhere for him to play on that roster, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them to try to fit him in.

Posted
I disagree with this. DD hasn't been known to be a passive pussy.

 

Your right but I would think getting under the tax threshold has more to do with ownership wanting to be under it then DD being a passive pussy. I may be wrong though. Just don't see it

Posted
Your right but I would think getting under the tax threshold has more to do with ownership wanting to be under it then DD being a passive pussy. I may be wrong though. Just don't see it

 

There's a huge financial incentive to get under the threshold and reset the clock. Penalties get worse if you're over for multiple years but all it takes is a single season to reset that clock.

Posted
I think Detroit is another logical landing spot for Edwin, so Ilich can try for his World Series before it's too late.

I know there currently isn't anywhere for him to play on that roster, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them to try to fit him in.

 

Nope. Avila's ordered payroll to be slashed in Detroit, so forget it. Plus, V-Mart and Cabrera are blocking his spots at 1B and DH. Plus, Detroit is too far over the tax to even think about making a move for Edwin.

 

Posted
Texas seems like such a logical place for EE at this point.

 

Out of the question--Texas is at $171.354M(based on the CBT payroll) and can't take on any more money.

 

Posted
I think Detroit is another logical landing spot for Edwin, so Ilich can try for his World Series before it's too late.

I know there currently isn't anywhere for him to play on that roster, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them to try to fit him in.

 

Where would he play, CF?

Posted
Also no way EE goes to Boston, imo. His options seem limited. If I had to put money on it, I would say Texas or Seattle

 

Texas is tapped out, Seattle isn't realistic--Mariners need OFs and more bullpen help and can't exactly afford Edwin's deal, and really want to give Dan Vogelbach a chance to win the 1B job. Plus, Nelson Cruz is better used as a DH than a OF..

Posted
Out of the question--Texas is at $171.354M(based on the CBT payroll) and can't take on any more money.

 

 

I love how the link you included shows Texas is at about $130M...

 

Last I saw, I thought Texas was at about $165M or something. They have 1st and DH open (with Gallo & Profar pencilled in right now).

Posted
I love how the link you included shows Texas is at about $130M...

 

Last I saw, I thought Texas was at about $165M or something. They have 1st and DH open (with Gallo & Profar pencilled in right now).

 

Click on "Rangers Tax Tracker" -- that's the CBT payroll.. which shows $171M+.

Posted (edited)

 

 

Rick Westhead Verified account 

‏@rwesthead

#BlueJays will start 2017 w/ payroll budget of about $165M, up about 14% from starting payroll in 2016: source.

 

Rick Westhead Verified account 

‏@rwesthead

My math was wrong. Jays opening day payroll of $165M would mark an increase of 20%, not 14%, compared to opening day 2016. Apologies.

Edited by jerb
Community Moderator
Posted
Is that for the 25-man, or for the 40-man + all of the other costs that count towards the luxury tax?
Posted
Well if selling out every game and getting to the ALCS back to back years doesn't increase payroll, I don't know what would.

 

IMO that would be like a farmer going out and buying a bunch of brand new equipment after a record year. It's a pretty short-sighted business approach. I expect a mild increase in payroll, but I don't think you drive an extra $60M into the team simply because you were success in 2 of the past 20 years.

Posted
IMO that would be like a farmer going out and buying a bunch of brand new equipment after a record year. It's a pretty short-sighted business approach. I expect a mild increase in payroll, but I don't think you drive an extra $60M into the team simply because you were success in 2 of the past 20 years.

 

It's not really an equal analogy, because we can always reduce payroll in subsequent years when attendance drops. We have no large contracts on the books at all.

Posted
IMO that would be like a farmer going out and buying a bunch of brand new equipment after a record year. It's a pretty short-sighted business approach. I expect a mild increase in payroll, but I don't think you drive an extra $60M into the team simply because you were success in 2 of the past 20 years.

 

No. But he might go out and spend a little bit more on some better seeds to try and yield a bigger better crop next year.

Posted
It's not really an equal analogy, because we can always reduce payroll in subsequent years when attendance drops. We have no large contracts on the books at all.

 

The idea is to have the fans buy into the system to where they show up regardless of perceived success. Dropping salary upon one unsuccessful season just destroys a fanbase (see KC). Showing fans that you can be successful as a mid pack team isn't going to pack the house, but it won't increase expectations. It's tough as I doubt the "smart fanbase" is big enough anywhere to fill a stadium. Nor do they (we) bring an energy to the park.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...