reedjohnsonfan Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Gallardo is useful on the cheap. You guys are hilarious jumping to conclusions that he will be overpaid. Nobody thinks he's a really good pitcher, but he's a useful piece for the back end of your rotation. Say what you want about him but he can pitch, and do so adequately well in the majors. A lot of teams roster players who shouldn't even be pitching in the bigs and Shapiro is trying to avoid that, I'd be all over Gallardo if his price has rightfully so come way down.
nonamejays Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 With the quality of the Jays defense, they really should target as many GB pitchers as possible. More GB = more outs on batted balls.
Slugger Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 I mean...you could do worse. Giving up a pick would hurt though.
DerangedIdoit Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Shapiro pretty much flat out said there's a question whether the Jays have enough resources to complete such a transaction. Meaning there's not enough cash in the piggy bank. That means no Gallardo, Chris Davis, Cespedes, Upton etc. So everyone should stop even entertaining such notions. Position player wise there's no way anything of significance happens. Our 'challenges' as Shapiro puts it is pitching and there is no reason to not take him for his word when he says finding pitching depth (presumably low cost) is the primary focus. Look out for the Jays to explore contracts with the likes of Fister, Latos, Cliff Lee, Rodney, Stammen, Webb, Joe Nathan, Blanton etc. There also always the possibility of the trade route especially for a backup catcher.
AncientDiety Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 That will seriously effect the Handsome quotient.
AncientDiety Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Too bad she's stupid as f*** Women only have 1 use really, and it is not talking. EDIT: Just watched the video, she's not all that.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Women only have 1 use really, and it is not talking. EDIT: Just watched the video, she's not all that. http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/48140933.jpg
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/48140933.jpg Thanks for making me puke a little in my mouth - at work. Great start to my Friday. FWIW - tight body, but I don't find her that good looking either.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Thanks for making me puke a little in my mouth - at work. Great start to my Friday. FWIW - tight body, but I don't find her that good looking either. She does have that "don't talk to me because I'm a huge rad feminist" look about her. Bitchiness is kind of a turn on for me, though. Plus, when she opens her mouth, you can't help but find her less attractive. When it comes down to it, I'd definitely PIIHB, though, no question.
BTS Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Too bad she's stupid as f*** She teaches at college tho.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 She teaches at college tho. And this person is head of an entire department at a university:
BTS Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 And this person is head of an entire department at a university: I was joking. She brings it up every chance she gets, and it's annoying. Ana suxxxx.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 I was joking. She brings it up every chance she gets, and it's annoying. Ana suxxxx. Hard to tell through text, dummy. You're a huge TYT fanboi so I can't take that s*** as a joke. Watch that video though, it's hilarious.
AncientDiety Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/48140933.jpg Nice pic of you bra.
BTS Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Hard to tell through text, dummy. You're a huge TYT fanboi so I can't take that s*** as a joke. Watch that video though, it's hilarious. I haven't watched a single video since Cenk's Sam Harris clusterf*** a couple months ago.
flafson Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 After we had the Jays are in talk with Rodney ae acquired Storen If the trend holds true we are about to acquire a very good starting pitcher You think we can convert Dickey into a very good pitcher? I doubt it. Besides, I like the fact he gives us 200+ innings of ~4 ERA. Hard to replace it.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 I haven't watched a single video since Cenk's Sam Harris clusterf*** a couple months ago. The one where he mocks Harris for complaining that he gets misrepresented, tells his audience he will make every effort to not misrepresent him, and then goes on to lazily misrepresent him?
BTS Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 The one where he mocks Harris for complaining that he gets misrepresented, tells his audience he will make every effort to not misrepresent him, and then goes on to lazily misrepresent him? That's the one.
canadiansportsjunkie Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 I would like to have Gallardo on the team but only if we move Dickey. If we can move Dickey for a decent prospect and bullpen arm then sign Gallardo I am all for it.
Muck Bartinez Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Dickey is coming off a 3.6 RA9 WAR season, makes 12M, requires only a 1 year commitment, and has no draft pick tied to him. Gallardo is coming off a 2.5 WAR season, just declined 15.8M, requires at least 2-3 years, and has a draft pick tied to him. I don't see any scenario where Gallardo over Dickey makes any sense, unless you think that the Dickey return package would outweigh the draft pick and any value difference. ***Used different WARs since I think each represents their respective pitcher better.
bendera3 Verified Member Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 I would like to have Gallardo on the team but only if we move Dickey. If we can move Dickey for a decent prospect and bullpen arm then sign Gallardo I am all for it. Signing Gallardo would cost us a first round pick. I doubt selling on Dickey would get us first round talent. You're already at a loss.
flafson Verified Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 I would like to have Gallardo on the team but only if we move Dickey. If we can move Dickey for a decent prospect and bullpen arm then sign Gallardo I am all for it. Taking Gallardo only makes sense if you keep the same starters you have now.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Taking Gallardo only makes sense if you keep the same starters you have now. this is how i see it also Stro, Dick, Gallardo, Estrada, Happ Chavez swingman Hutch and Sanchez depth in Buffalo
Jonzo Verified Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Signing Gallardo would cost us a first round pick. I doubt selling on Dickey would get us first round talent. You're already at a loss. I thought it would be a 7th round pick?
glory Old-Timey Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Subbing Gallardo for Dickey and losing a pick in the process would be terrible. There's no way Dickey will be able to fetch the equivalent of a first round pick in a trade, and Gallardo over Dickey is an insignificant roster change. Makes no sense.
Sorrow Verified Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Dickey is coming off a 3.6 RA9 WAR season, makes 12M, requires only a 1 year commitment, and has no draft pick tied to him. Gallardo is coming off a 2.5 WAR season, just declined 15.8M, requires at least 2-3 years, and has a draft pick tied to him. I don't see any scenario where Gallardo over Dickey makes any sense, unless you think that the Dickey return package would outweigh the draft pick and any value difference. ***Used different WARs since I think each represents their respective pitcher better. I looked up Gallardo's RA9-WAR for shits and giggles, 4.3. I was actually surprised and expected it much closer to his fWAR.
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Signing Gallardo would cost us a first round pick. I doubt selling on Dickey would get us first round talent. You're already at a loss. Unless your gut says that his aging body and arm are going to continue to dive and it's time to cut bait.
TilsonBritoFan Verified Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Soooo...Kennedy got 5 years $70 mill? Dafuq? The Royals are f***ed on that one. Way to give up a pick for a replacement level pitcher dumbasses.
AncientDiety Verified Member Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 This may be a move looking at 2017 and beyond. The FA market is thin in pitchers next year, and the Jays also have EE and JB to resign. They may want to solidify the rotation now for the next couple seasons so they have less to worry about in 2017.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now