Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Question for the board:

 

If the Storen-Revere swap had been done earlier in the offseason, would you still do the Chavez-Hendriks move? I know some don't like that move anyway, but I'm interested to hear from the ones that do.

 

Having Hendriks would allow Sanchez and Osuna that much more leniency in stretching out in AAA. Big league SP depth would take a hit to start the season (or would it, with guys like Hernandez on MiL deals?).

 

Basically, would you still make the Hendriks trade today even if you liked it in November?

 

With the stuff Sanchez and Osuna have, I don't think it makes much sense to stretch them out in AAA regardless. If you want to manage their innings at the big league level, then one starts for half the year and the other relieves, then they swap or something. Assuming you make the playoffs, you can move them both back into the pen for October.

  • Replies 490
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Question for the board:

 

If the Storen-Revere swap had been done earlier in the offseason, would you still do the Chavez-Hendriks move? I know some don't like that move anyway, but I'm interested to hear from the ones that do.

 

Having Hendriks would allow Sanchez and Osuna that much more leniency in stretching out in AAA. Big league SP depth would take a hit to start the season (or would it, with guys like Hernandez on MiL deals?).

 

Basically, would you still make the Hendriks trade today even if you liked it in November?

 

This makes me like the Chavez deal more not less. I like Hendriks but I like Storen more and he was obtained without increasing the overall payroll and though it's true that Revere could have been useful, the SP depth Chavez provides is probably more useful. I'm happy with the end result.

Posted
This makes me like the Chavez deal more not less. I like Hendriks but I like Storen more and he was obtained without increasing the overall payroll and though it's true that Revere could have been useful, the SP depth Chavez provides is probably more useful. I'm happy with the end result.

 

You can look at it this way....who's more valuable to the current team....Revere in LF (with Pompey/Saunders on the bench), or Chavez providing SP depth...

 

I'd rather have the SP depth personally. Storen replaces Hendrix

Posted
Storen replaces Hendrix

 

http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/images/story/jimi-hendrixs-early-recordings-as-a-sideman-to-get-proper-release-20140717/20140717-jimihendrix-x306-1405632285.jpg

Posted
Question for the board:

 

If the Storen-Revere swap had been done earlier in the offseason, would you still do the Chavez-Hendriks move? I know some don't like that move anyway, but I'm interested to hear from the ones that do.

 

Having Hendriks would allow Sanchez and Osuna that much more leniency in stretching out in AAA. Big league SP depth would take a hit to start the season (or would it, with guys like Hernandez on MiL deals?).

 

Basically, would you still make the Hendriks trade today even if you liked it in November?

 

Hendricks is a better asset to have then Chavez, i hated that deal the day it was made and still do.

 

Just watch what Beane will get for Hendricks in a year or two(with 30 saves or holds under his belt), i would be shocked if he doesn't get two times as what we got for him.

Posted
100-120 innings so you want a lot of 2 inning appearances or a ton of 1 inning appearances? That's a lot of mileage for a guy only, what, 2-3 years removed from TJ?
Posted
100-120 innings so you want a lot of 2 inning appearances or a ton of 1 inning appearances? That's a lot of mileage for a guy only, what, 2-3 years removed from TJ?

 

No it isn't.

Posted

Pretty sure the Jays got rid of the whole "inning limits" and evaluating a workload by that. Instead they are going to look at the player's individual health throughout the season and if he needs a break whether it be a skipped start or a few days off in the pen they will do that.

 

Personally, I think this is the way to go. Blanket statements like this player shouldn't increase his innings pitched by "x" amount doesn't make much sense when there is so much better information you can evaluate a player's health by.

Posted
100-120 innings so you want a lot of 2 inning appearances or a ton of 1 inning appearances? That's a lot of mileage for a guy only, what, 2-3 years removed from TJ?

 

It's a reasonable jump, nothing too crazy. He threw 77 innings last season, including the post-season, so a jump of 20-40 innings isn't all that bad.

Posted
Pretty sure the Jays got rid of the whole "inning limits" and evaluating a workload by that. Instead they are going to look at the player's individual health throughout the season and if he needs a break whether it be a skipped start or a few days off in the pen they will do that.

 

Personally, I think this is the way to go. Blanket statements like this player shouldn't increase his innings pitched by "x" amount doesn't make much sense when there is so much better information you can evaluate a player's health by.

 

Yeah, you're right, but that was under Alex, who knows how Shapiro and Atkins feel about it.

Posted
No it isn't.

 

It's a reasonable jump, nothing too crazy. He threw 77 innings last season, including the post-season, so a jump of 20-40 innings isn't all that bad.

 

Dellin Betances led all relievers with 84 innings pitched last season.

 

100 - 120 innings in relief is way too much for any pitcher before even considering he is a young player with a past TJ surgery.

 

Its an idiotic idea.

Posted
Dellin Betances led all relievers with 84 innings pitched last season.

 

100 - 120 innings in relief is way too much for any pitcher before even considering he is a young player with a past TJ surgery.

 

Its an idiotic idea.

 

He wouldn't be used like Betances though. That's what he's suggesting. Betances was used whenever the hell Giradi got scared than some. Osuna's outings would be more controlled.

Posted
People are just thinking themselves into the ground in regards to Osuna when the solution is so f***ing simple. The guy is not a young Mariano Rivera. He had a good year as a reliever. He had a 3.00 FIP. Steamer projects him for a 3.44 FIP, ZIPS projects 3.22.

 

In the 2nd half last year his FIP was 3.84. Osuna was great but he's not so irreplaceable that we have to sacrifice his future to keep him in the pen.

 

A guy like Blanton had better numbers last year and projects to have better numbers this year. All you do is sign Blanton and let him set up with Cecil. You let Osuna start regularly in AA or AAA. He gets his innings like every other SP prospect would get their innings. And when he comes back up in July you have a top 5 bullpen, a stretched out Osuna for next year and you win the World Series!

 

Would be ideal.

Posted
Dellin Betances led all relievers with 84 innings pitched last season.

 

100 - 120 innings in relief is way too much for any pitcher before even considering he is a young player with a past TJ surgery.

 

Its an idiotic idea.

 

It's not so much about innings, than appearances, hardly idiotic.

Posted
People are just thinking themselves into the ground in regards to Osuna when the solution is so f***ing simple. The guy is not a young Mariano Rivera. He had a good year as a reliever. He had a 3.00 FIP. Steamer projects him for a 3.44 FIP, ZIPS projects 3.22.

 

In the 2nd half last year his FIP was 3.84. Osuna was great but he's not so irreplaceable that we have to sacrifice his future to keep him in the pen.

 

A guy like Blanton had better numbers last year and projects to have better numbers this year. All you do is sign Blanton and let him set up with Cecil. You let Osuna start regularly in AA or AAA. He gets his innings like every other SP prospect would get their innings. And when he comes back up in July you have a top 5 bullpen, a stretched out Osuna for next year and you win the World Series!

 

I would love this, and it makes perfect sense. If they want to save money as well, they could go after Carter Capps to take that role. I'm not sure what it would take, but it might not be as crazy an ask as one would expect, given he has never been used as a closer.

 

That said, I have my doubts that Osuna will be used the logical way we hope for, because of "win now" mode.

Posted
Yeah, you're right, but that was under Alex, who knows how Shapiro and Atkins feel about it.

 

Based on everything I've seen/read about them it leads me to believe they would evaluate it the same way. They are in favour of every player having an individual strength/conditioning program for each player so chances are they would evaluate health in the same way.

 

It makes no sense to have an arbitrary innings limit for all pitchers.

Posted
Based on everything I've seen/read about them it leads me to believe they would evaluate it the same way. They are in favour of every player having an individual strength/conditioning program for each player so chances are they would evaluate health in the same way.

 

It makes no sense to have an arbitrary innings limit for all pitchers.

 

I agree with you, hopefully you're right. Stroman and Sanchez, doing those crazy, two-per-day, workouts, 5 times a week this off-season, tells me that they could potentially be just as durable as a pitcher who threw 180 IP this past season.

Posted
I agree with you, hopefully you're right. Stroman and Sanchez, doing those crazy, two-per-day, workouts, 5 times a week this off-season, tells me that they could potentially be just as durable as a pitcher who threw 180 IP this past season.

 

Hopefully they don't overdo it and pull a League.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I agree with you, hopefully you're right. Stroman and Sanchez, doing those crazy, two-per-day, workouts, 5 times a week this off-season, tells me that they could potentially be just as durable as a pitcher who threw 180 IP this past season.

 

i might say the opposite is true

Posted
Hendricks is a better asset to have then Chavez, i hated that deal the day it was made and still do.

 

Just watch what Beane will get for Hendricks in a year or two(with 30 saves or holds under his belt), i would be shocked if he doesn't get two times as what we got for him.

 

i wouldnt be shocked if the trade blows up in billy beane's face like every other deal he does nowadays. off the top of my head the only move i can think of that didnt absolutely suck balls was the one where he got billy burns.

Posted
i wouldnt be shocked if the trade blows up in billy beane's face like every other deal he does nowadays. off the top of my head the only move i can think of that didnt absolutely suck balls was the one where he got billy burns.

 

He did pretty well in the 2 Zobrist deals if you ask me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...