Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
It's possible for someone to be top prospect and be s***** at the same time. That's kind of what player development is - closing the delta between present skills and tool based ceiling.

 

I don't know how you can look at his minor league peripherals and say that they aren't s*****. He walked like 5.0/9 in the minors and his K rate was pretty crummy for a prospect that throws 97. It was poo.

 

Chi-Chi Gonzalez was also a high raked prospect but his peripherals wwere s*** as well. Sanchez isn't a unique case.

  • Replies 4.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Dude, you continue to dream, with crazy absurd trade offers, this isn't a video game?

That's absurd, and unbelievable.

 

My post about your silly dreams is just as tight. FA, is a crap shoot, and I wish you and everyone run with their lifestyle, having family and kids are massive here!! Sorry, I'm out, TRUTH BOMB!!!

 

I don't know what this means? Especially in consideration.

 

Go Away!

 

Yer Dumn!!!

 

It'll never match the budget.

 

Yet your numbers are silly.

 

Yer dumn.

 

Hnnngghhh....

 

 

Pure Spanky at his finest.

Posted
If the Marlins end up trading Ozuna (their young CF who they don't get along with), they would have a hole to fill in CF. There is also talk of them possibly listening on trade offers for Fernandez (why I have no f***ing idea, but they would look for more young controllable talent in return). Not sure if the Jays have the assets to make a play here but the thought of Fernandez in our rotation next to Stroman is kind of fap worthy. Dangling Sanchez & Pompey is probably a start but maybe more of an AA move than a Shapiro move? Fernandez doesn't come without risk but has ace written all over him.
Community Moderator
Posted
If the Marlins end up trading Ozuna (their young CF who they don't get along with), they would have a hole to fill in CF. There is also talk of them possibly listening on trade offers for Fernandez (they would look for more young controllable talent in return). Not sure if the Jays have the assets to make a play here but the thought of Fernandez in our rotation next to Stroman is pretty appealing. Dangling Sanchez & Pompey is probably a start but maybe more of an AA move than a Shapiro move? Fernandez doesn't come without risk but has ace written all over him.

 

Stroman + Alford +

Posted
Stroman + Alford +

 

 

Most would say acquiring Donaldson, Price, or Tulowitzky would begin with Stroman too. Maybe we're not as stupid as them.

Posted
If the Marlins end up trading Ozuna (their young CF who they don't get along with), they would have a hole to fill in CF. There is also talk of them possibly listening on trade offers for Fernandez (why I have no f***ing idea, but they would look for more young controllable talent in return). Not sure if the Jays have the assets to make a play here but the thought of Fernandez in our rotation next to Stroman is kind of fap worthy. Dangling Sanchez & Pompey is probably a start but maybe more of an AA move than a Shapiro move? Fernandez doesn't come without risk but has ace written all over him.

 

I'm not certain that parting with a ton of prospect capital for a Boras client is the best use of our assets right now, but if the price is right then go for it.

Community Moderator
Posted
Most would say acquiring Donaldson, Price, or Tulowitzky would begin with Stroman too. Maybe we're not as stupid as them.

 

Donaldson absolutely, but definitely not the other two.

Posted
Donaldson absolutely, but definitely not the other two.

 

fair enough, just saying deals can get done without giving up our best chip.

Posted
There's nothing wrong with it for me when I use chrome.

 

thanks, I must have disabled styles with a shortcut or something on the site.

Posted
Most would say acquiring Donaldson, Price, or Tulowitzky would begin with Stroman too. Maybe we're not as stupid as them.

 

I think you would agree that the package given for Donaldson would be an exception, not the rule here.

Posted
I think you would agree that the package given for Donaldson would be an exception, not the rule here.

 

I'm not saying it was a bad trade for the Jays, obviously, but if/when Barretto is playing like Carlos Correia with 6 years of control come 2017, lets revisit our judgement of the package then.

Posted
I'm not saying it was a bad trade for the Jays, obviously, but IF/when Barretto is playing like Carlos Correia with 6 years of control come 2017, lets revisit our judgement of the package then.

 

Lmao.

 

There you go.

Posted
I'm not saying it was a bad trade for the Jays, obviously, but if/when Barretto is playing like Carlos Correia with 6 years of control come 2017, lets revisit our judgement of the package then.

 

Even if that happens, the Donaldson trade was still excellent

Posted
Would you guys feel comfortable with giving up Sanchez for Chavez

 

Hell no. Why would we even consider that?

Posted
Hell no. Why would we even consider that?

 

Your saying that you wouldn't consider trading a relief pitcher with s*** peripherals for an above average starter?

Posted
Your saying that you wouldn't consider trading a relief pitcher with s*** peripherals for an above average starter?

 

Chavez sucks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...