Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I have a strange feeling that the reason Boyd is still in Double-A when he should be in AAA is because Alex is going to trade him in his last ditch desperation move. plus Matt Boyd has average at best stuff. He's not going to be the saviour for this pitching staff
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I have a strange feeling that the reason Boyd is still in Double-A when he should be in AAA is because Alex is going to trade him in his last ditch desperation move. The difference between AA and AAA isn't all that significant.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 plus Matt Boyd has average at best stuff. He's not going to be the saviour for this pitching staff Similar to Graveman, let him make his numbers look dominating and then trade him for a big league piece. Given AA's ridiculous fast tracking when it comes to prospects, the fact that he's keeping Boyd in a level below where he should be is telling. Or maybe I'm just making too much of it.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Similar to Graveman, let him make his numbers look dominating and then trade him for a big league piece. Given AA's ridiculous fast tracking when it comes to prospects, the fact that he's keeping Boyd in a level below where he should be is telling. Or maybe I'm just making too much of it. Equally good chance he just doesn't know what he's doing.
IronLadle Verified Member Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 The difference between AA and AAA isn't all that significant. So why wouldn't you promote him? His trade value increases drastically if he can dominate AAA.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 plus Matt Boyd has average at best stuff. He's not going to be the saviour for this pitching staff Plus fastball for a lefty. 91-94 mph. I don't know about his secondaries
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 So why wouldn't you promote him? His trade value increases drastically if he can dominate AAA. No it doesn't. There's little to lose or to gain. They're practically the same level.
Caper Verified Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Well. Let's all hope we can keep this argument going after today.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 ERA now down to 3.95 discuss.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 How many SwStr today? 5 SO / 3 BB isn't very good, wasn't really getting GB either. I dunno how many SwStr he got, hopefully a good amount.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 How many SwStr today? 5 SO / 3 BB isn't very good, wasn't really getting GB either. I dunno how many SwStr he got, hopefully a good amount. 5 or 6
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 How many SwStr today? 5 SO / 3 BB isn't very good, wasn't really getting GB either. I dunno how many SwStr he got, hopefully a good amount. most of the strike outs were caught looking.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Seems like kind of a typical back-end pitcher start... an improvement but not as good as he needs to be, imo C+ for today from me, so I'm assuming an F from Tercet because "lefties were raking off of him"
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Seems like kind of a typical back-end pitcher start... an improvement but not as good as he needs to be, imo C+ for today from me, so I'm assuming an F from Tercet because "lefties were raking off of him" 7 or 8 swinging strikes in 6 innings
IronLadle Verified Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Seems like kind of a typical back-end pitcher start... an improvement but not as good as he needs to be, imo C+ for today from me, so I'm assuming an F from Tercet because "lefties were raking off of him" A quality start can't be less than a B, can it?
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Sexy ERA down to 3.88 Nobody cares about ERA He's improving and not hurting the team. Actually has been the most consistent starter all year.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Reliable in that you know what you're getting, in a sense, maybe. Best? That would be Hutchison
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Reliable in that you know what you're getting, in a sense, maybe. Best? That would be Hutchison Consistent is the better word.... edited. Hutch best overall easily, following by Burly.... but they've had their blowups
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Nobody cares about ERA He's improving and not hurting the team. Actually has been the most consistent starter all year. Consistently Bad.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 As I said in the GDT, his K/9 went up with this start, his BB/9, ERA, FIP, xFIP all went down with this start. His BABIP was also .400 today (though, he wasn't getting as many GBs as usual.) Improvement, not VAST improvement, but trending (slowly) in the right direction.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Consistently Bad. It's hilarious how some of you guys aren't man enough to admit when you've been wrong
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 It's hilarious how some of you guys aren't man enough to admit when you've been wrong What are these guys you mention wrong about specifically
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Sanchez had 10 men reach base in 6 innings, which was even higher than his season WHIP. You cant have 10 men reach in 6 innings, and have it be a good start.
IronLadle Verified Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Sanchez had 10 men reach base in 6 innings, which was even higher than his season WHIP. You cant have 10 men reach in 6 innings, and have it be a good start. Obviously you can, because Sanchez just went 6 innings with 2 earned runs.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Earned Runs =/= Success Meh, this is hard to actually agree with. Earned Runs =/= repeatable skill, however.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 Meh, this is hard to actually agree with. Earned Runs =/= repeatable skill, however. So then Earned run -> success, and earned runs =/= repeatable, success =/= repeatable? Now I find that hard to agree with but i'm sure this debate has been exhausted enough and we all know the various philosophies of ERA vs DIPS
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 So then Earned run -> success, and earned runs =/= repeatable, success =/= repeatable? Now I find that hard to agree with but i'm sure this debate has been exhausted enough and we all know the various philosophies of ERA vs DIPS I'm saying that "if a pitcher gives up few earned runs, that is a successful outing for the team", and also saying "that does not indicate that this pitcher is likely to repeat that successful outing for the team". Bottom line, success = wins, which is giving up fewer runs than your opponents. Naturally, however, you want to have a guy on the mound who is the most likely to repeat that success which, according to the peripheral stats, Sanchez is not (but f*** if he doesn't keep mocking the s*** out of those peripherals, somehow...)
Yohendrick Pinango Buffalo Bisons - AAA LF Welcome to the big leagues, Yohendrick!!! Congratulations! Explore Yohendrick Pinango News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now