Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Jays have tried to get Ian Kinsler and Brett Anderson this off season


Recommended Posts

Posted
Any chance he did it on purpose to screw JPR since he was with the A's? Just reaching here. If Sabean was serious about that trade, I don't see why he would leak it. Who knows.

 

Sabean's a dry humper. He's described in exactly those terms in Moneyball.

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'm left wondering, how the do they go from looking into Kinsler to running with Goins?

 

If true this gives a big boost of credibility to the Drew angle.

 

Of course AA could have simply been looking at the upgrade non-positionally and just in terms of wins added, if such thought is possible with this front office.

 

If that's the case though then not doing anything from now til the season starts would even be more puzzling.

 

So they're going to do something right?

 

Fingers crossed on it not being stupid.

Posted
I'm left wondering, how the do they go from looking into Kinsler to running with Goins?

 

If true this gives a big boost of credibility to the Drew angle.

 

Of course AA could have simply been looking at the upgrade non-positionally and just in terms of wins added, if such thought is possible with this front office.

 

If that's the case though then not doing anything from now til the season starts would even be more puzzling.

 

So they're going to do something right?

 

Fingers crossed on it not being stupid.

 

Going with Goins (dur hur hur....) may not be the ideal plan B, but it just might be the only realistic plan C if you consider the pursuit of Drew as the real fallback in this situation. Because if the team strikes out on Drew and already struck out on Kinsler, then what? Not sure I'm comfortable with the idea of trying to pry someone like Kendrick from the Angels or another tradeable 2B out there when the rest of the league knows that the Jays tried and failed twice on an upgrade and might be getting desperate. Or in some situations (Barney) I wouldn't want to pay a trade price when really Goins isn't that bad of a backup-backup plan to have. Even if he can barely hit at replacement level, if he provides awesome defence up the middle that will be enough to help keep run totals down and let the rest of the offence do its thing. Because I think a healthy 1-8 in the Jays lineup should be good enough to carry the team along if they can avoid a repeat of 2013's pitching meltdown.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Burnett, Jimenez, Santana, Arroyo....Yoon?....and?

 

Burnett, Jimenez, Santana, Masterson, Shark, Bailey, probably some others I'm too delirious to remember. I don't just mean in FA. Attainable period.

Posted
If Tex was able to get Fielder for Kinsler but had a deal worked out with toronto first that fell apart only because of Kinsler's NTC, than it really makes you wonder and a bit scared to guess what AA was offering Tex.
Posted
If Tex was able to get Fielder for Kinsler but had a deal worked out with toronto first that fell apart only because of Kinsler's NTC, than it really makes you wonder and a bit scared to guess what AA was offering Tex.

 

I think you're forgetting just how horrible Fielder's contract is.

Posted
Going with Goins (dur hur hur....) may not be the ideal plan B, but it just might be the only realistic plan C if you consider the pursuit of Drew as the real fallback in this situation.

 

I agree, on the terms that we can label Goins as plan E or below, because I can't imagine him being the 3rd best option available at the start of the off-season, nor can I imagine second base as not being a position the Jays should have looked hard at upgrading.

Posted
Going with Goins (dur hur hur....) may not be the ideal plan B, but it just might be the only realistic plan C if you consider the pursuit of Drew as the real fallback in this situation. Because if the team strikes out on Drew and already struck out on Kinsler, then what? Not sure I'm comfortable with the idea of trying to pry someone like Kendrick from the Angels or another tradeable 2B out there when the rest of the league knows that the Jays tried and failed twice on an upgrade and might be getting desperate. Or in some situations (Barney) I wouldn't want to pay a trade price when really Goins isn't that bad of a backup-backup plan to have. Even if he can barely hit at replacement level, if he provides awesome defence up the middle that will be enough to help keep run totals down and let the rest of the offence do its thing. Because I think a healthy 1-8 in the Jays lineup should be good enough to carry the team along if they can avoid a repeat of 2013's pitching meltdown.

 

I have a hard time figuring out how a Janssen/Santos for Ackley framework doesn't make a ridiculous amount of sense for both sides.

Posted
I agree, on the terms that we can label Goins as plan E or below, because I can't imagine him being the 3rd best option available at the start of the off-season, nor can I imagine second base as not being a position the Jays should have looked hard at upgrading.

 

3rd best option in terms of talent? No. Absolutely not. But 3rd best option in terms of talent and cost and ease of acquisition and all that stuff? maybe. If Drew goes back to Boston or basically anywhere that's not Toronto, it's going to get hard for AA to deal with other GMs without them figuring they can just bend the Jays' front office over and extort whatever price they want in exchange for a 2B.

Posted
I have a hard time figuring out how a Janssen/Santos for Ackley framework doesn't make a ridiculous amount of sense for both sides.

 

Seattle has a number of players that are expendable for them and would be good fits for us. I'd imagine a guy like Happ would make a certain amount of sense for them too, especially in Safeco and considering two rookies in their rotation might be pushing it. They may be scared to deal with the Jays though after the last few trades we made with them :)

Posted
3rd best option in terms of talent? No. Absolutely not. But 3rd best option in terms of talent and cost and ease of acquisition and all that stuff? maybe. If Drew goes back to Boston or basically anywhere that's not Toronto, it's going to get hard for AA to deal with other GMs without them figuring they can just bend the Jays' front office over and extort whatever price they want in exchange for a 2B.

 

Now, sure. The timeline I'm looking at though is day 1 after the season ends, second base should have been on the radar right after the rotation and C.

 

If AA was looking at investing that much resources into Kinsler while still needing to address the rotation then sticking with Goins is a little odd no?

Posted
Now, sure. The timeline I'm looking at though is day 1 after the season ends, second base should have been on the radar right after the rotation and C.

 

If AA was looking at investing that much resources into Kinsler while still needing to address the rotation then sticking with Goins is a little odd no?

 

hard to say without knowing what the Blue Jays side of that proposed trade was. Maybe Texas was willing to practically give him away at that point. Or maybe this just about fell into Toronto's lap and they would've taken Buehrle's contract back if the Jays ate some value. Too many variables in play to really pin down how serious/important management was treating this possibility.

Posted
Goins comes down entirely to whether or not he can hit at a replacement level. If he can just not suck like JP with the bat and not get himself out, his defence is good enough that he can be stashed in the 9 hole and let the rest of the lineup can cover for him. A healthy and performing-up-to-snuff Reyes, Melky, Bautista, Encarnacion, Rasmus, Lawrie, Lind, and even Navarro should be able to put up enough runs to overcome 1 offensive non-factor with a great glove.
Posted
This worries me. The fact that they came out with this, and conveniently right before the "State Of The Franchise". Now when they end up with nothing, they can use the excuse "Oh, but we tried!". Hope I'm wrong, but with this team, ughhh... I'll just leave it at that.
Posted
I have a hard time figuring out how a Janssen/Santos for Ackley framework doesn't make a ridiculous amount of sense for both sides.

 

Because they want to see if the bat he briefly flashed at the end of last year is real and they have an OF spot for him.

Posted
This worries me. The fact that they came out with this, and conveniently right before the "State Of The Franchise". Now when they end up with nothing, they can use the excuse "Oh, but we tried!". Hope I'm wrong, but with this team, ughhh... I'll just leave it at that.

 

I get this feeling too. Though a part of me would be shocked if Toronto doesn't land at least 1 of the remaining pitchers who have been talked about ad nauseum, it's hard not to be cynical regarding this organization. Put me in the group who'd be happy if Toronto landed 1 of Jimenez/Santana/Burnett and Drew for 2B. That would at least be something and would give hope for 2014.

Posted
I get this feeling too. Though a part of me would be shocked if Toronto doesn't land at least 1 of the remaining pitchers who have been talked about ad nauseum, it's hard not to be cynical regarding this organization. Put me in the group who'd be happy if Toronto landed 1 of Jimenez/Santana/Burnett and Drew for 2B. That would at least be something and would give hope for 2014.

 

I agree. What gave it away for me was this:

 

"Anderson, dealt in December by the Oakland Athletics to Colorado Rockies for pitcher Drew Pomeranz and prospect Chris Jensen, nearly ended up with the Blue Jays in exchange for Sergio Santos. But those talks fell apart due to concern over Anderson’s injury risk."

 

So wait a minute...you're scared to give up the guy who has had 30 IP over the past two years for the guy who had 80 IP over the past two years because of the OTHER guy's injury risk? Whatever. $4M salary difference then either one could be bought out following the 2014 season so it's not like there were huge salary considerations. If you're that scared about Anderson why pursue him in the first place or even mention this at all? Oh yeah to try to save face.

Posted
Because they want to see if the bat he briefly flashed at the end of last year is real and they have an OF spot for him.

 

He was so, so bad in the outfield last year, it's hard to believe they would try that experiment again. He has below average speed, instincts, and arm. The Mariners are just an incredibly stupid organization.

Posted
I agree. What gave it away for me was this:

 

"Anderson, dealt in December by the Oakland Athletics to Colorado Rockies for pitcher Drew Pomeranz and prospect Chris Jensen, nearly ended up with the Blue Jays in exchange for Sergio Santos. But those talks fell apart due to concern over Anderson’s injury risk."

 

So wait a minute...you're scared to give up the guy who has had 30 IP over the past two years for the guy who had 80 IP over the past two years because of the OTHER guy's injury risk? Whatever. $4M salary difference then either one could be bought out following the 2014 season so it's not like there were huge salary considerations. If you're that scared about Anderson why pursue him in the first place or even mention this at all? Oh yeah to try to save face.

 

They presumably gathered more medical data as a trade became a realistic possibility.

Posted
Off the top of my head, they've given significant OF innings to Ackley, Morse, Ibanez, Bay, and Thames in the last couple years. I don't even want to know what they do to evaluate defense.

 

And they compounded it even more this offseason

Posted
This worries me. The fact that they came out with this, and conveniently right before the "State Of The Franchise". Now when they end up with nothing, they can use the excuse "Oh, but we tried!". Hope I'm wrong, but with this team, ughhh... I'll just leave it at that.

I agree. I think the front office is reaching for whatever exaggerated BS they can come up with in a vain attempt to placate the fanbase when they stand pat this offseason.

Posted
Thread title sucks

 

Interesting though, I do wish it went through, wonder what the deal would have been?

 

Really though. Who's our Prince Fielder??? (Being serious, don't know who to equate him to. Edwin is better than him and not an apparent PITA like he is)

Posted
He was so, so bad in the outfield last year, it's hard to believe they would try that experiment again. He has below average speed, instincts, and arm. The Mariners are just an incredibly stupid organization.

 

If he can handle second he should be able to handle left. It's incredibly stupid to put this kind of limitation on a player.

 

IF he can hit enough for left then a smart organization would work with him. A stupid organization, an arrogant organization would say "he has below average speed instincts and arm" and put limitations on him.

 

The big issue is his bat. But if the bat plays (which I'm not convinced it will) then a smart organization does the opposite of what you suggest.

Posted
I'm left wondering, how the do they go from looking into Kinsler to running with Goins?

 

If true this gives a big boost of credibility to the Drew angle.

 

Of course AA could have simply been looking at the upgrade non-positionally and just in terms of wins added, if such thought is possible with this front office.

 

If that's the case though then not doing anything from now til the season starts would even be more puzzling.

 

So they're going to do something right?

 

Fingers crossed on it not being stupid.

 

As always, if we find out about this, there were 3-4 other options AA probably considered

 

He actually IS trying to upgrade the starting rotation, and second base, and DH platoon

 

He has obviously just decided that he won't overpay via trade this year

 

If he is going to overpay a bit anywhere I hopes it's for Jiminez. He *should* be able to trade for a legit 2B at reasonable cost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...