Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

L54

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by L54

  1. I think this would surprise virtually the entire industry.
  2. That's probably too pessimistic, compared to mine which may be overly optimistic. If we met in the middle, that is still the makings of a cheap, young, effective and controllable rotation. I'd rather the Jays grow their own pitching, supplementing it with bats through FA or trade. Not many marquee arms lining up to sign in Toronto.
  3. I can agree with this. I've just always had the impression that it would be Jose OR Edwin past 2016 (probably Jose), not both. Although it's not ideal, I'm sure the Jays would rather be in a situation where they're looking to add impact hitters through FA, and not impact SP. By 2017 you hope one of Hoffman or Osuna have established themselves as legitimate supplement options to the rotation, which consists of Stroman, Norris, Hutch and + +
  4. Semantics, I guess. Whether it's AA or not, I don't expect both to be here past 2016.
  5. It's far more likely that they just let one of them walk. They will be planning on competing in 2016 as well, and dealing one of their star sluggers sends a bad message (even if it's the right call) to fans, and even ill informed players.
  6. You can, but it really doesn't make much sense, especially when one is James Shields. Yes one of Bau/EE will probably walk. But the difference between 100M being on the books like you're saying and the more likely 60M is quite significant.
  7. Do you guys really expect AA to lock up both Edwin and Bautista past 2016 to 20M+ per year? There's just no feasible way that happens (without a massive payroll increase).
  8. Lol come on BTS. You can't sit here and say the 2017 payroll is looking brutal, then quote 3 contracts that aren't even signed.
  9. Just imagine the atrocity if the Jays made the playoffs and Martin hadn't caught Dickey's knuckleball. Every Dickey start you're sitting one of your best players because Dickey loves Thole like a brother.
  10. All I ask is when all of this is over, one way or the other you remember this thread. Come back so that we can revisit and discuss the outcome.
  11. Please choose Kevin Towers.
  12. Yes, he will. The longer he drags this out, the more difficult it will be for Baltimore to employ front office people in the future.
  13. What you guys are failing to understand is it will happen regardless of whether you feel it needs to or not. If Angelos doesn't budge, a third party will make it happen. It's basic business practice. I'd like to hear all these clown's responses to being denied the opportunity to advance their careers.
  14. Haha that's why I said drafted by and from Pittsburgh, Spanky.
  15. I think him being drafted by and from Pittsburgh holds a lot of value to them, similar to Pompey and the Jays. I really doubt he's available for anything less than a stellar package.
  16. FWIW, one of my past coaches told me that the FSU Strength and Conditioning coach told him that Travis is the best player he's seen in real life.
  17. Colby wasn't a true Cardinal and we just don't know Peter!!
  18. He might end up not having a say. We will see.
  19. So now you're conceding that Angelos will let him go?
  20. The Houston Astros effect. Trading relievers at the deadline.
  21. I think it was merged with the initial thread
  22. That's what I was thinking. Thought it would be since Beane claimed him last year. Probably more so for this reason than a genuine want.
×
×
  • Create New...