Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

[Hector Gomez] - Jays are Intensifying Talks for Marte + Restructured Deal


Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Screenshot_20261114_100244_Edge.jpg.881ff5b5a26b92526339a6a6fb4deb6c.jpg

Take the Rumor for what its worth.  I dont get why we'd pay the assets to trade for him just to give him a fatter extension as well.   

The best part of trading for him to justify giving up prospects amid his off field issues was his contract so we'd have enough to add other major pieces as well.  Im a big Marte fan on the field but not liking hearing that unless the prospect cost is minimal.

Community Moderator
Posted

His current CBT hit is like 13.875M a year for the next 4 years. I get that he's probably demanding an extension in order to waive his NTC, but the rumoured extension seems very rich. Maybe things are more complicated than that. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 minute ago, BTS said:

His current CBT hit is like 13.875M a year for the next 4 years. I get that he's probably demanding an extension in order to waive his NTC, but the rumoured extension seems very rich. Maybe things are more complicated than that. 

Maybe Arizona is going to pay some of Marte's deal or would agree to take on Santander to get him to waive his no trade?  Lets see how it shakes out (if at all) but theres definitely gotta be more to it. 

Community Moderator
Posted

Hard to tell exactly what he's owed in real dollars because his contract has a bunch of performance-based escalators. Looks like 5/75.5 before the escalators (and it seems like he's hit some of them) with that 5th year being a player optin for 11.5M (plus escalators). So 135M would be an increase of 40-60M over 4 years for Marte, which he'd be demanding in exchange for waiving his 10-5 rights and accepting the trade. 

The salary seems fair, but it sucks that the CBT (or cap) hit would go from like 14M to almost 35M. Unless the old contract being torn up still factors into the CBT hit? 

You have to be a CBA expert to understand the details of this situation. 

Either way, Arizona's return here should be light if Marte comes with a market value restructuring. Unless they're taking on Santander or something. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
13 minutes ago, BTS said:

Hard to tell exactly what he's owed in real dollars because his contract has a bunch of performance-based escalators. Looks like 5/75.5 before the escalators (and it seems like he's hit some of them) with that 5th year being a player optin for 11.5M (plus escalators). So 135M would be an increase of 40-60M over 4 years for Marte, which he'd be demanding in exchange for waiving his 10-5 rights and accepting the trade. 

The salary seems fair, but it sucks that the CBT (or cap) hit would go from like 14M to almost 35M. Unless the old contract being torn up still factors into the CBT hit? 

You have to be a CBA expert to understand the details of this situation. 

Either way, Arizona's return here should be light if Marte comes with a market value restructuring. Unless they're taking on Santander or something. 

Is there anyway to give him a massive signing bonus without it impacting his CBT hit? Or maybe that contract will be heavily deferred to lower the CBT hit.  

Community Moderator
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jays24 said:

Is there anyway to give him a massive signing bonus without it impacting his CBT hit?

Not under the current CBA

Old-Timey Member
Posted
3 minutes ago, hanton said:

"..intensifying talks.."  vs  "..some interest.."

 

Its the restructuring of the contract talks that made the rumor seem serious.  We'll see how it shakes out in the next few days. 

Posted

I'd imagine Clement would be going back the other way, or at least be going somewhere.

 

No need for both Clement and Smith on the bench, and Smith will likely get a lower arb deal more suited for a bench player.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
2 minutes ago, abola2121 said:

"Arizona's price said to be high"

Those motherf***ers owe us for Moreno, and it's not as if they have whole lot of leverage in these talks.

They also didnt when we handed them one of the best prospects in baseball for Varsho so im semi scared lol.  

Old-Timey Member
Posted

The biggest reason to value Marte aside from his talent is his contract. Restructuring it would defeat the purpose. If he only had two more “Marte” level seasons in him before he fell off a cliff, he’d probably still end up meeting or exceeding the value on his current contract. Much more difficult to do with the numbers Hector is throwing out there.

With that said, it’s Hector, so his sources are likely the voices in his head.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Jays24 said:

They also didnt when we handed them one of the best prospects in baseball for Varsho so im semi scared lol.  

"Handed".  You just can't help yourself eh

Old-Timey Member
Posted
42 minutes ago, Brownie19 said:

"Handed".  You just can't help yourself eh

Sure, handed was a strong choice of word there.  Ill strike that from the records lol. 

Posted
4 hours ago, BTS said:

His current CBT hit is like 13.875M a year for the next 4 years. I get that he's probably demanding an extension in order to waive his NTC, but the rumoured extension seems very rich. Maybe things are more complicated than that. 

At such price better to put that money on Lowe. Unless what we will give up to DBack won't be our best prospect. The Varsho trade should make Atkins be more careful, and refuse that King, Parker, Yesevage be included.

Posted

Lowe, Chisholm, Arraez should be the priority before Marte, unless DBack almost give him for free. I suspect them to ask Parker or King with Clement or Lukes, and then they will sign Chisholm or Lowe, and our GM will look like a noob🤣

Posted
1 hour ago, Jays24 said:

Sure, handed was a strong choice of word there.  Ill strike that from the records lol. 

I can't wait to re-open the validity of the Moreno/Varsho trade in 2036 with you.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Brownie19 said:

I can't wait to re-open the validity of the Moreno/Varsho trade in 2036 with you.

You know even if he loses this argument, he’ll just keep pointing to Varsho not winning game 7 when he had his opportunity. As if that makes the entire acquisition terrible 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 hour ago, Brownie19 said:

I can't wait to re-open the validity of the Moreno/Varsho trade in 2036 with you.

I saw a post of Moreno and it made remember the discourse over him at the time.  This stuff happens, dont get so hurt over it.  

Old-Timey Member
Posted
3 hours ago, Jays24 said:

Sure, handed was a strong choice of word there.  Ill strike that from the records lol. 

Gotta keep an eye out for the verb police 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...