Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 2 hours ago, Terminator said: Jurrangelo is the switch-pitcher who has made some Top 100 lists. Tai Peete is a power-hitting CF prospect with high boom/bust potential. And then Williamson who is an elite glove 3B that can't really hit. 50 FV, 40+ FV, 40 FV for two years of Donovan seems like an overpay by the M's.* *If the Jays made a similar deal I probably would have praised the move as a heist Is that Longenhagen's FV numbers? He's super conservative. BA's numbers are much higher. But then again those numbers are outdated(FG's). BA has a 55 on Clintje, 60 on Peete and 40 on Willyson. 😜
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 39 minutes ago, Stangstag said: Im a big Suarez fan, but he’s getting up there in age and there’s been questions about the defense lately. Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds? Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now? Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment. But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team. Spanky__99, BatFlip and Stangstag 3
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 3 Posted February 3 21 minutes ago, Brownie19 said: Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds? Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now? Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment. But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team. Per MLB Radio host who spoke with Reds' president of baseball ops: "Primary DH" Brownie19, BatFlip, Stangstag and 1 other 4
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 35 minutes ago, Brownie19 said: Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds? Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now? Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment. But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team. Yeah good comp, Teo/Santander/Suarez are all pretty similar with the bat. Spanky__99 1
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 7 hours ago, Spanky__99 said: And? They're very similar hitters guy, Geno's DHing and periodically playing the corners is what was reported yesterday. Again, Santander is 3 years younger. 5 hours ago, Brownie19 said: Any word if Geno will play 3rd for the Reds? Is Ke'Bryan Hayes just a utility guy now? Geno's bat feels like Teo's to me - the type of hitter with a high probability of just falling off a cliff at any moment. But until that happens - fun guy to have crushing homers for your team. Per the GM of the Reds.
jaysblue Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 I think Santander’s age played some role, but not nearly as big as people are making it out to be when comparing his deal to what Suarez got. Timing mattered a lot for Santander. Last offseason was pretty thin for impact bats after Soto, so teams needing offense like the Jays didn’t have many alternatives. That scarcity definitely helped push his market. In 2024, Santander hit 44 HR with 100+ RBI and did it as a switch hitter, which matters a lot when you’re talking lineup flexibility and matchups. The Jays also probably had to go five years instead of three or four on Santander because it’s Toronto - they were coming off a losing season, and there was real uncertainty around Vlad at the time. This offseason was much deeper, with more corner OF/DH options and bounce-back types available, so leverage is spread out more. If he hit free agency this year instead of last, the deal probably looks shorter and/or cheaper. Stangstag 1
mphenhef Verified Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 12 hours ago, jaysblue said: Yeah figured Suarez would have to settle for only a one-year deal, especially at this point. Great value for a guy who has pretty much averaged 3-4 WAR per season. Would have been a nice fit on the Jays, but 3B and DH overcrowded already with Okamoto/Santander/Springer. Suarez was offered 2 years by the Pirates at least that we know of. He chose 1 year with a known org instead. Stangstag and Spanky__99 2
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 1 hour ago, mphenhef said: Suarez was offered 2 years by the Pirates at least that we know of. He chose 1 year with a known org instead. Also gotta look at the market this offseason. LOTS of guys taking 1yr deals or deals with opt outs after year 1/2. Probably has to do with the CBA uncertainty.
Laika Community Moderator Posted February 3 Posted February 3 Doesn't make sense to compare Santander and Suarez. Every FA market is its own context. Santander was projected for 4/$80m and got 5/$68.6m, as a 30 year old. It was not a bad contract at all, they weren't paying him to be that good, maybe hoping for a 2 win player for 3 years. Obviously year 1 went as bad as possible lol. Suarez was projected for 3/$60m and got 1/$15m but probably turned down something like 2/$30m from the Pirates. At 34 years old. Interesting to see that all of Suarez's projections have nose-dived as he is a DH on the depth chart now. Not a single 2 WAR projection. It's pretty clear that teams think he is a butcher at 3B. So there is big disconnect between his expected 2026 value and his 2025 and prior WARs. Stangstag 1
glory Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 The Jays value defense and contact more than most teams, so I don’t think they would have been in on Suarez either way. The only hacker on the team is Varsho and he plays elite CF defense, and the only poor defensive player is Santander and he puts the ball in play (typically) a lot more. I think it’s fair to say that if Atkins could have one back, he’d definitely pass on Santander last winter. They clearly expected Springer to play the OF a lot more than he did, but now that he’s firmly a DH, it makes Tony’s fit on this roster a lot more clunky. With that said, the contract isn’t terrible due to the deferrals. Just have to hope he has a couple of 30-40 HR seasons left in him.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 12 hours ago, G-Snarls said: Per MLB Radio host who spoke with Reds' president of baseball ops: "Primary DH" I suspect most teams no longer view him as a full time 3rd baseman - which is why his market wasn't as strong.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 2 hours ago, mphenhef said: Suarez was offered 2 years by the Pirates at least that we know of. He chose 1 year with a known org instead. That's good to know. I like seeing Pittsburgh and Cincy making efforts to sign guys like this. Spanky__99 1
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 12 hours ago, Stangstag said: Yeah good comp, Teo/Santander/Suarez are all pretty similar with the bat. Santander is a little different in that he doesn't strike out as much - he isn't 27%+ K rates like Teo/Suarez Stangstag and Spanky__99 2
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted February 3 Posted February 3 1 hour ago, Brownie19 said: Santander is a little different in that he doesn't strike out as much - he isn't 27%+ K rates like Teo/Suarez Which is exactly why this FO prioritized him over those guys. Plus he’s a switch hitter which is nice Spanky__99 and Brownie19 2
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 3 Posted February 3 2 hours ago, glory said: The Jays value defense and contact more than most teams, so I don’t think they would have been in on Suarez either way. The only hacker on the team is Varsho and he plays elite CF defense, and the only poor defensive player is Santander and he puts the ball in play (typically) a lot more. I think it’s fair to say that if Atkins could have one back, he’d definitely pass on Santander last winter. They clearly expected Springer to play the OF a lot more than he did, but now that he’s firmly a DH, it makes Tony’s fit on this roster a lot more clunky. With that said, the contract isn’t terrible due to the deferrals. Just have to hope he has a couple of 30-40 HR seasons left in him. Agreed. Jays would not have been interested in Suarez or Arraez
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 3 Posted February 3 Having Springer and Santander both on the roster really means anyone they bring in has to be usable/good defensively Jimcanuck, Stangstag and Spanky__99 3
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted February 4 Posted February 4 On 2/2/2026 at 8:32 PM, Stangstag said: 30 yrs old vs 34, are you restarted my dude? I don't give a s*** about the age of a player who is signed to a one year deal lol. I just think its crazy Geno got that in comparison.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 4 Posted February 4 18 hours ago, mphenhef said: Suarez was offered 2 years by the Pirates at least that we know of. He chose 1 year with a known org instead. That's interesting, projections have the Pirates as a better team than the Reds. The familiarity definitely won out. https://www.fangraphs.com/standings/playoff-odds/fg/div
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Fangraphs have the M's as the beasts of the AL... AL East 2026 Results 2026 Projections Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L ROS W% Strength of Sched Win Div Clinch Bye Clinch Wild Card Make Playoffs Win WS Yankees 0 0 .000 0.0 86.2 75.8 .532 .502 30.8% 26.3% 38.4% 69.2% 5.8% Blue Jays 0 0 .000 0.0 84.9 77.1 .524 .503 23.4% 19.6% 38.1% 61.5% 4.7% Red Sox 0 0 .000 0.0 84.9 77.1 .524 .504 23.2% 19.8% 38.6% 61.8% 5.0% Orioles 0 0 .000 0.0 83.8 78.2 .517 .502 18.4% 15.4% 35.7% 54.1% 3.4% Rays 0 0 .000 0.0 77.9 84.1 .481 .505 4.2% 3.2% 16.8% 21.0% 0.6% AL Central 2026 Results 2026 Projections Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L ROS W% Strength of Sched Win Div Clinch Bye Clinch Wild Card Make Playoffs Win WS Tigers 0 0 .000 0.0 84.2 77.8 .520 .495 46.0% 23.8% 15.3% 61.4% 4.0% Royals 0 0 .000 0.0 81.1 80.9 .501 .496 25.9% 11.6% 15.4% 41.4% 1.8% Twins 0 0 .000 0.0 80.1 81.9 .494 .497 20.2% 8.7% 14.7% 35.0% 1.5% Guardians 0 0 .000 0.0 75.6 86.4 .467 .499 7.2% 2.3% 6.8% 14.1% 0.4% White Sox 0 0 .000 0.0 67.9 94.1 .419 .503 0.6% 0.1% 0.7% 1.2% 0.0% AL West 2026 Results 2026 Projections Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L ROS W% Strength of Sched Win Div Clinch Bye Clinch Wild Card Make Playoffs Win WS Mariners 0 0 .000 0.0 87.7 74.3 .541 .496 59.0% 44.4% 18.8% 77.9% 8.5% Astros 0 0 .000 0.0 81.3 80.7 .502 .498 17.3% 11.1% 22.4% 39.7% 1.8% Rangers 0 0 .000 0.0 80.0 82.0 .494 .500 13.0% 7.9% 19.4% 32.4% 1.3% Athletics 0 0 .000 0.0 78.3 83.7 .483 .501 8.9% 5.1% 14.4% 23.3% 0.8% Angels 0 0 .000 0.0 72.9 89.1 .450 .505 1.7% 0.8% 4.3% 6.1% 0.1% Brownie19 1
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Zips for the East... ZiPS Projections – AL East Median Standings (1/29) Team W L GB Pct Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win% 80th 20th Toronto Blue Jays 90 72 — .556 32.1% 40.5% 72.6% 4.8% 99.8 82.9 Boston Red Sox 90 72 — .556 25.8% 46.7% 72.5% 4.9% 97.7 83.2 Baltimore Orioles 88 74 2 .543 22.2% 39.5% 61.7% 5.8% 97.3 79.8 New York Yankees 87 75 3 .537 18.9% 41.4% 60.3% 5.4% 96.0 79.7 Tampa Bay Rays 75 87 15 .463 1.1% 10.6% 11.7% 0.5% 82.6 67.5
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted February 4 Posted February 4 5 hours ago, Spanky__99 said: Zips for the East... ZiPS Projections – AL East Median Standings (1/29) Team W L GB Pct Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win% 80th 20th Toronto Blue Jays 90 72 — .556 32.1% 40.5% 72.6% 4.8% 99.8 82.9 Boston Red Sox 90 72 — .556 25.8% 46.7% 72.5% 4.9% 97.7 83.2 Baltimore Orioles 88 74 2 .543 22.2% 39.5% 61.7% 5.8% 97.3 79.8 New York Yankees 87 75 3 .537 18.9% 41.4% 60.3% 5.4% 96.0 79.7 Tampa Bay Rays 75 87 15 .463 1.1% 10.6% 11.7% 0.5% 82.6 67.5 Yankees 4th lol wow. This division man… Spanky__99 1
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Skubal's arbitration case is happening today
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted February 4 Posted February 4 14 hours ago, Jonn said: I don't give a s*** about the age of a player who is signed to a one year deal lol. I just think its crazy Geno got that in comparison. Ok… but every front office does. That’s why the context of age matters when comparing deals.
Laika Community Moderator Posted February 4 Posted February 4 14 hours ago, Jonn said: I don't give a s*** about the age of a player who is signed to a one year deal lol. I just think its crazy Geno got that in comparison. Silly opinion though. Aging curves get steeper as players get older! The expected decline is more intense AND there is a higher risk every year of completely being done. Brownie19, Spanky__99 and Gen.Disarray 3
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted February 4 Posted February 4 We need a complete and total shutdown of this entire organization until we can figure out what the hell is going on. Jays24, Spanky__99 and Stangstag 3
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Red Sox singing IKF That pretty much guarantees that two of his three total home runs this year will be against us LOL Stangstag 1
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted February 5 Posted February 5 4 hours ago, Laika said: Silly opinion though. Aging curves get steeper as players get older! The expected decline is more intense AND there is a higher risk every year of completely being done. I don’t think Santander gets a one year 15 million dollar deal right now regardless of age. He might be 4 years younger. He certainly doesn’t look or play it. Had every injury under the sun last year.
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted February 5 Posted February 5 10 minutes ago, Terminator said: We need a complete and total shutdown of this entire organization until we can figure out what the hell is going on. Why what does this have anything to do with Baseball? Do you think they spent it on Kyle Tucker instead lol?
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Red Sox make their big infield addition lmao Spanky__99 1
glory Old-Timey Member Posted February 5 Posted February 5 IKF signing somewhere else is one of the best Jays moves of the off-season. G-Snarls 1
Charles McAdoo Toronto Blue Jays - MLB IF On Monday, McAdoo returned to the big leagues, and in his second at-bat, he homered off of Sonny Gray, helping the team to a 2-1 win. Explore Charles McAdoo News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now