CanuckofChicago Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I don't pretend to have enough information to debate this, but most people would point to the reality that many criminals who are let back into society become repeat offenders (whether that's because of the situation we put them in - or simply because they are a moronic POS who don't deserve to be part of society). What % become repeat offenders? I don't know, but what % is too much? If there are 100 registered sex offenders and only 15% repeat - that's 15 more kids that are molested by some f***ing wacko. IMO, that's 15 more than we should ever allow....especially when the "upside" is to simply let 85 registered sex offenders back into society... I'd say about 2 years ago now, a registered child molester, who's been convinced multiple times, who apparently said in court that if set free that he would molest again, was relocated from Saskatchewan to rural Ontario - some 15-20 minutes from my house. It's f***ing scary and creepy. I can tell you that the recidivism rate here in Illinois is close to 40% and that is for non-violent offenders. This is mainly because there are real no programs for ex-offenders. You cannot get a job, you cannot get housing, you cannot get anything. The legal system down here is so screwed up. Americans love to incarcerate people and with Justice Department about to allow private prisons back into existence it is going to get worse. Check out the situation in Louisiana; http://atlantablackstar.com/2017/05/22/louisiana-world-leader-in-incarceration-cannot-pay-its-public-defenders/
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I don't get it either. This thread has turned into some kind of gross virtue signaling exercise about who is most against child molestation. Because, you know, some people are totally for it. "If I saw this guy, I'd beat his face in! That's how much I'm against child molesters!" I think it just sickens some people more than other I guess. I'm not trying to virtue signal, I'm the farthest thing from a saint. I just hate people who prey on the weak.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Are you retarded? Of course you would. He's free, did nothing to provoke you and you assaulted him. I'd hope you would get charged for that, otherwise what kind of stupid society do we live in? I was joking, meat. I'm not assaulting anyone, unless it were my family. There, you can get mad at that.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 So the punishment for a crime isn't just the sentence you get, it's also, in some cases, a lifetime of poverty with no hope of seeing hard work and personal betterment? I realize that this is often true, but I don't understand it. It's a common misconception that the initial sentence is the only punishment for offences. A criminal record negatively effects your life and career. Certain crimes (sex offences, serious felonies) effect it more than others. It doesn't condem you to a terrible life, but it can prevent you from doing whatever you want.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Plus the guy he ran over was 72 years old, he's pretty near ready to kick the bucket anyway. lol
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 It's a common misconception that the initial sentence is the only punishment for offences. A criminal record negatively effects your life and career. Certain crimes (sex offences, serious felonies) effect it more than others. It doesn't condem you to a terrible life, but it can prevent you from doing whatever you want. Consequences for awful decisions......that's life folks.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I think it just sickens some people more than other I guess. I'm not trying to virtue signal, I'm the farthest thing from a saint. I just hate people who prey on the weak. You can simultaneously hate what he did and act like a goddamn human being and be willing to rehabilitate and reintegrate him into society. Unless you want the guy dead, the only thing you accomplish by ostracizing him and cutting off all job prospects is putting more kids at risk. It's absolutely silly that we take such a vengeful and unforgiving stance to make ourselves feel better, even at the expense of more victims.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I was joking, meat. I'm not assaulting anyone, unless it were my family. There, you can get mad at that. You only assault your family?
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I can tell you that the recidivism rate here in Illinois is close to 40% and that is for non-violent offenders. This is mainly because there are real no programs for ex-offenders. You cannot get a job, you cannot get housing, you cannot get anything. The legal system down here is so screwed up. Americans love to incarcerate people and with Justice Department about to allow private prisons back into existence it is going to get worse. Check out the situation in Louisiana; http://atlantablackstar.com/2017/05/22/louisiana-world-leader-in-incarceration-cannot-pay-its-public-defenders/ Holy f***, a voice of reason. Thank you.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Consequences for awful decisions......that's life folks. Exactly, he can still live a happy, productive live and contribute to society. He just can't ever be a teacher, social worker etc and I'd argue he shouldn't be in professional sports either.
BTS Community Moderator Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 It's a common misconception that the initial sentence is the only punishment for offences. A criminal record negatively effects your life and career. Certain crimes (sex offences, serious felonies) effect it more than others. It doesn't condem you to a terrible life, but it can prevent you from doing whatever you want. I'm aware of the reality of the situation, I just thought pretty everyone considered it to be more of an unfortunate outcome than a desireable one. I think the current state does a lot more harm than good. Especially when the criminal was a young teenager at the time.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 You only assault your family? Yes. You do understand my initial comment was hyperbole, right?
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 You can simultaneously hate what he did and act like a goddamn human being and be willing to rehabilitate and reintegrate him into society. Unless you want the guy dead, the only thing you accomplish by ostracizing him and cutting off all job prospects is putting more kids at risk. It's absolutely silly that we take such a vengeful and unforgiving stance to make ourselves feel better, even at the expense of more victims. This argument comes down to the penalties associated with such offences. Its quite obvious I'm on the side of sentences being way to lenient for this kind of offense. But everyone is entitled to their own opinions.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I'm aware of the reality of the situation, I just thought pretty everyone considered it to be more of an unfortunate outcome than a desireable one. I think the current state does a lot more harm than good. Especially when the criminal was a young teenager at the time. Oh yeah there's lots of issues. For example there's instances of people registered as sex offenders for relatively minor crimes who will be treated the same as a more serious offender.
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 You can simultaneously hate what he did and act like a goddamn human being and be willing to rehabilitate and reintegrate him into society. Unless you want the guy dead, the only thing you accomplish by ostracizing him and cutting off all job prospects is putting more kids at risk. It's absolutely silly that we take such a vengeful and unforgiving stance to make ourselves feel better, even at the expense of more victims. This draws parallels of that narrative that Muslims who are fanatic are only so because of Westerners pushing them in that direction. I expect more from you Boxy
CanuckofChicago Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Holy f***, a voice of reason. Thank you. Thanks. If you want even more evidence of a screwed system the same people in some states who require a Public Defender have to pay a tax or fee when they are released. I recommend you check out John Oliver's piece on the PD system. I can post evidence all-day that proves how ridiculous the system is. Remember what Winston Churchill said "The mood and temper of the public in regard to the treatment of crime and criminals is one of the most unfailing tests of the civilisation of any country. A calm and dispassionate recognition of the rights of the accused against the state and even of convicted criminals against the state, a constant heart-searching by all charged with the duty of punishment, a desire and eagerness to rehabilitate in the world of industry of all those who have paid their dues in the hard coinage of punishment, tireless efforts towards the discovery of curative and regenerating processes and an unfaltering faith that there is a treasure, if only you can find it in the heart of every person – these are the symbols which in the treatment of crime and criminals mark and measure the stored up strength of a nation, and are the sign and proof of the living virtue in it."
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 This draws parallels of that narrative that Muslims who are fanatic are only so because of Westerners pushing them in that direction. I expect more from you Boxy Lol no it doesn't at all. Actually I'll change this. What's the benefit to bombing the middle East? Destroying ISIS and other shitlord groups. What's the benefit to keeping Heimlich out of baseball? You and people like you feel good about yourselves. They are not comparable, at all, but apparently you mirror Spanky's thoughts on the matter as well. There's also something kinda missing here...some kind of unifying book that tells them to kill the enemies of Allah. Is there a child molester handbook I'm not aware of?
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Lol no it doesn't at all. Actually I'll change this. What's the benefit to bombing the middle East? Destroying ISIS and other shitlord groups. What's the benefit to keeping Heimlich out of baseball? You and people like you feel good about yourselves. They are not comparable, at all, but apparently you mirror Spanky's thoughts on the matter as well. There's also something kinda missing here...some kind of unifying book that tells them to kill the enemies of Allah. Is there a child molester handbook I'm not aware of? I never said he should be kept out of baseball. But there are countless studies that show in most cases pedophilia isn't curable, it's just suppressed.
Laika Community Moderator Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Ump in this afternoon game is just the straight up STAR of the show.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I never said he should be kept out of baseball. But they're are countless studies that show in most cases pedophilia isn't curable, it's just suppressed. Yeah, that's because it's a mental condition. No one chooses to be sexually attracted to kids. You'd think that a life working hard in baseball would keep him busy and reduce the chances of him reoffending.
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Ump in this afternoon game is just the straight up STAR of the show. Ya it's been tough to watch.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 see how much drama this guy has caused in this forum. Now imagine if we drafted him and then called him up after a few years
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Ump in this afternoon game is just the straight up STAR of the show. Maybe his right eye doesn't work
Laika Community Moderator Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Yeah, that's because it's a mental condition. No one chooses to be sexually attracted to kids. You'd think that a life working hard in baseball would keep him busy and reduce the chances of him reoffending. No, with all that money he'd just buy more kids to raep. See: Subway Jared.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Lol no it doesn't at all. Actually I'll change this. What's the benefit to bombing the middle East? Destroying ISIS and other shitlord groups. What's the benefit to keeping Heimlich out of baseball? You and people like you feel good about yourselves. They are not comparable, at all, but apparently you mirror Spanky's thoughts on the matter as well. There's also something kinda missing here...some kind of unifying book that tells them to kill the enemies of Allah. Is there a child molester handbook I'm not aware of? Oh f*** off... bring this to OT if you need to keep blathering on and taking my hyperbolic comment so seriously. I believe in rehabilitation if you weren't paying attention.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Ump in this afternoon game is just the straight up STAR of the show. He's brutal.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 No, with all that money he'd just buy more kids to raep. See: Subway Jared. Eating Subway all the time requires a lot less effort than playing baseball as far as full time jobs go. I'd actually argue that eating Subway was a catalyst to Jared's crime since I can't imagine ever feeling satisfied after eating one of their s***** sandwiches.
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Yeah, that's because it's a mental condition. No one chooses to be sexually attracted to kids. You'd think that a life working hard in baseball would keep him busy and reduce the chances of him reoffending. You might not choose to be attracted to kids, although thats probably debatable. But you most definitely make a choice to abuse them.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 see how much drama this guy has caused in this forum. Now imagine if we drafted him and then called him up after a few years Haha, true. Apart from fans and the media, imagine the reaction from the players with him joining a MLB clubhouse where half the players have young kids.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 You might not choose to be attracted to kids, although thats probably debatable. But you most definitely make a choice to abuse them. I agree, and I'd hope that he sees the consequences of his actions and learns from them.
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP He took the Loss, but the 19-year-old southpaw gave up one run on five hits and a walk in five innings on Wednesday night. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts