TheHurl Site Manager Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/2017-zips-projections-toronto-blue-jays/ http://cdn.fangraphs.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Jays-Depth.png Stole this from someone that already took the time to write it up) 1. 2B Travis 471pa, 113ops+, 2.9war, 4.0war/650 2. 3B Donaldson 657pa, 141ops+, 7.0war, 6.9war/650 3. 1B 4. DH Morales 557pa, 115ops+, 2.0war, 2.3war/650 5. SS Tulowitzki 481pa, 106ops+, 3.3war, 4.5war/650 6. C Martin 462pa, 102ops+, 3.1war, 4.4war/650 7. CF Pillar 609pa, 92ops+, 3.2war, 3.4war/650 8. RF Pompey 497pa, 76ops+, 0.8war, 1.1war/650 9. LF Carrera 381pa, 81ops+, 0.6war, 1.0war/650 B. UT Smoak 387pa, 97ops+, 0.4war, 0.7war/650 B. OF Upton 433pa, 77ops+, 0.4war, 0.6war/650 B. IF Goins 425pa, 61ops+, 0.0war, 0.0war/650 B. C Jimenez 240pa, 74ops+, 0.9war, 2.4war/650 B. UT Tellez 514pa, 102ops+, 0.7war, 0.9war/650 B. IF Gurriel 567pa, 102ops+, 1.7war, 2.0war/650 X Encarnacion 576pa, 137ops+, 3.6war, 4.1war/650 X Bautista 510pa, 134ops+, 3.1war, 4.0war/650 X Saunders 427pa, 112ops+, 1.7war, 2.6war/650 SP Sanchez 31gs, 78era-, 86fip-, 4.6war, 4.8war/32gs SP Estrada 29gs, 89era-, 102fip-, 3.1war, 3.4war/32gs SP Stroman 23gs, 92era-, 85fip-, 2.2war, 3.1war/32gs SP Happ 27gs, 92era-, 93fip-, 2.5war, 3.0war/32gs SP Liriano 28gs, 98era-, 102fip-, 2.0war, 2.3war/32gs SP Bolsinger 20gs, 107era-, 101fip-, 0.9war, 1.4war/32gs SP Reid-Foley 24gs, 121era-, 117fip-, 0.0war, 0.0war/32gs RP Osuna 71.2ip, 64era-, 71fip-, 1.4war, 1.3war/65ip RP Barnes 66.1ip, 82era-, 78fip-, 0.7war, 0.7war/65ip RP Biagini 66.2ip, 88era-, 90fip-, 0.5war, 0.5war/65ip RP Grilli 41.1ip, 86era-, 88fip-, 0.3war, 0.5war/65ip RP Tepera 61.0ip, 93era-, 96fip-, 0.3war, 0.3war/65ip RP Loup 48.0ip, 92era-, 95fip-, 0.2war, 0.3war/65ip RP Campos 58.1ip, 93era-, 90fip-, 0.2war, 0.2war/65ip RP Leone 62.0ip, 105era-, 97fip-, -0.1war, -0.1war/65ip RP Girodo 56.1ip, 112era-, 111fip-, -0.3war, -0.4war/65ip
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 This is a playoff team if we get 2+ WAR from 1B and the corner outfield spots. Hopefully we can do that.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Interesting how well AJ Jimenez projects in terms of value despite his offense being regarded as garbage. This can't be just regular positional adjustment can it?
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Wow, if we fill our lineup holes with capable people we are looking great according to Zips.
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Really really nice Sanchez projection.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted November 30, 2016 Author Posted November 30, 2016 Interesting how well AJ Jimenez projects in terms of value despite his offense being regarded as garbage. This can't be just regular positional adjustment can it? They seem to have him rated higher defensively than Martin. Not at all from what I've seen/heard. Essentially they have around Rene Rivera defensively.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 So we have a total of 40.5 WAR (88.5 wins) with our 5 infielders, Pillar, Morales, the rotation, and the top 5 relievers. If we can add decent players at our 3 open positions and a couple of good relievers then we could definitely project for 95 wins. I wouldn't be comfortable predicting that, but it's nice to see.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Something to note is the Morales' defensive contribution is rated as a 0, rather than negative. He basically projects for a win higher than last year despite the same offensive output, so probably take the under there unless he exceeds his offensive projection (possible in a better ballpark suited to his profile perhaps?). Not entirely sold on Travis, but 2.9 WAR is not an exaggeration. Don't have any problems with the rotation, I would take the over on Stroman and Liriano could fluctuate massively in either direction, maybe a slight under on Sanchez.
BigBounceyBlueBalls Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Interesting thanks!
BigBounceyBlueBalls Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 So we have a total of 40.5 WAR (88.5 wins) with our 5 infielders, Pillar, Morales, the rotation, and the top 5 relievers. If we can add decent players at our 3 open positions and a couple of good relievers then we could definitely project for 95 wins. I wouldn't be comfortable predicting that, but it's nice to see. Who all did or didn't you use to arrive at that number?
BigCecil Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Pillar a consistent 3+ WAR producer projecting that again. I know its mostly from D, but few including myself, thought he would never be more than a 4th OF. Pretty cool. Wish he could hit lol
TheHurl Site Manager Posted November 30, 2016 Author Posted November 30, 2016 Don't have any problems with the rotation, I would take the over on Stroman and Liriano could fluctuate massively in either direction, maybe a slight under on Sanchez. Player over/under. This year's contest?
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Resign Bautista, sign Fowler/ platoon bat for RF and this is a pretty good team. Zips seems quite high on a few players though.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Sign Fowler and Pearce, trade for Granderson, sign a reliever. Not sure how much that will cost, but would put the Jays in a good spot.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Player over/under. This year's contest? I'm pretty comfortable in saying that the participation in such a contest would be high.
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 I'm pretty comfortable in saying that the participation in such a contest would be high. Yup I would definitely think so
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 I'd take the under on Sanchez and Happ. I have a feeling Morales will completely s*** the bed opening the door for Rowdy
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 I really hope Morales doesn't s*** the bed in year one of a three deal
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 I'd take the under on Sanchez and Happ. I have a feeling Morales will completely s*** the bed opening the door for Rowdy With our current 1B situation, he doesn't even have to s*** the bed to give Tellez a shot, unless Smoak somehow breaks out.
TBJ12 Verified Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 I'd take the under on Sanchez and Happ. I have a feeling Morales will completely s*** the bed opening the door for Rowdy Doors already wide open for Rowdy if the Jays go into 2017 with Smoak as their first baseman.
Gary Verified Member Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 I really hope Morales doesn't s*** the bed in year one of a three deal He's in for a career year.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 Another year where an extra $15-20M in budget could make us the AL favourites. My whole life I've heard the "If we're contending, Rogers will give us the money to get us over the top" mantra. Is this not exactly that scenario? And last year as well? You don't know what our payroll will be. Most of the big ticket free agents and trade targets are still available.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 Colabello is on that graphic. I thought the Jays let him go from the system?
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 Colabello is on that graphic. I thought the Jays let him go from the system? No, he's on the 40 man... has an option left, also.
AdamGreenwood Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 Another year where an extra $15-20M in budget could make us the AL favourites. My whole life I've heard the "If we're contending, Rogers will give us the money to get us over the top" mantra. Is this not exactly that scenario? And last year as well? What would we do with $15-20 M that would practically guarantee us 2-3 WAR?
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 How come there is such a great variance between Steamer predictions and Zips Zips has Sanchez at 4.5 but Steamer only 3. Same with Estrada too, Pretty much every bluejays Zips is higher.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 Steamer predictions for WAR: Martin 2.5 in 116 games Saltalamacchia N/A (not yet updated as he's on 0 games, they have Graterol and AJ sharing backup duties at a combined 0.1 WAR in 31 games) Smoak 0.1 in 115 games Pearce 1.3 in 91 games Travis 1.8 in 117 games Barney 0.2 in 38 games (Goins 0.0 in 36 games) Donaldson 6.1 in 145 games Tulowitzki 2.8 in 119 games Upton 0.2 in 88 games Pillar 2.8 in 134 games Bautista 2.6 in 124 games Carrera 0.0 in 50 games (Pompey 0.5 in 57 games) Morales 0.8 in 129 games Sanchez 3.0 Stroman 3.1 Happ 2.5 Estrada 1.4 Liriano 2.2 Osuna 0.9 Grilli 0.5 Biagini 0.5 Howell 0.2 Floyd 0.1 Loup 0.4 Sparkman 0.2 Barnes 0.4 Bolsinger 0.5 Dermody 0.0 Tepera 0.2 Girodo 0.0 Schultz 0.1
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 38 WAR in total, i.e 86 wins. Pearce, Travis, Barney, Sanchez are particularly low IMO.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 38 WAR in total, i.e 86 wins. Pearce, Travis, Barney, Sanchez are particularly low IMO. Pitching is usually going to be a bit lower because of injury risk.
Nafro Verified Member Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 I was kind of under the impression adding up a teams total projected WAR to predict outcome of season was not a great idea.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now