Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
@ShiDavidi: With JA Happ, #BlueJays now at roughly $130m for 2016 if they tender all 10 arb-eligible players. Factor in 0-3 guys and not much $ left.

 

Ugh friggin gross, we had our chance in 2015, we are not winning in 2016, again they cheap out on pitching.

  • Replies 440
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

@jonmorosi: Happ's agent Jay Fee: "While several teams expressed interest, the Blue Jays (were) determined from the outset of free agency ... "

 

@jonmorosi: Jay Fee on Happ continued: " . . . and demonstrated a solid commitment early in the process which JA appreciated."

 

@jonmorosi: Fee: "He'll (return) to familiar management, teammates and a fan base who wants to see the club build on all the success of last season."

Posted
So you have faith that Happ's next 3 seasons will mirror his 2015 one? Curious.

 

No one should expect. If he is that guy then this deal is highway robbery

Posted
Is this supposed to be a shot? The Red Sox will head into the season with a much better team than the Jays and with a much better farm system.

 

Congrats on off season champs I guess? Worked well last year.

Posted
And that's quite frankly the dumbest thing they can do with the offence that they have. It's absolutely stupid to waste those years to bide time for cheap pitching. Sign aces, draft your cheap pitching then.

 

Price will cost over $200M/7 years. It wasn't going to happen, nor would it have been a smart investment.

Posted
At least one thing interesting about Happ is that he's been gaining velocity throughout most of his career (much like Lee). He probably isn't a guy who will lose a lot of stuff over the next few years.
Posted
Well at the beginning of the offseason, we thought maybe Price/Shark/Zimmerman, instead, we got Chavez and Happ..I bet you all didn't see that one coming!
Posted
I still don't understand. What was the purpose of this if they traded for Chavez and signed Estrada. They are just adding quantity now, not quality. 3/36 for Happ? There's no way anyone can like that. The bottom of the rotation is solid, that's about it lol ..It seems like a huge waste tying up 12m into that slot in the rotation. They needed a #2 not another #4..

 

JA friggin happ @ 36m hahaha, that's way too funny. I miss AA :(

 

The biggest problem with AA's regime was that he lacked quantity, so when guys got hurt, you're giving 75+ IP a year to horeshit pitching. At least now there's a ton of depth getting acquired so when injuries come, the rotation won't be hit as hard.

Posted
Last year worked out really well for the Red Sox after all that money spent.

 

Ew. I don't hate happ but I hate this move for the team we have.

We needed an ace or number two, not another back ender.

Our window is small, I don't like how our FO and others on the board aren't realizing this. Well it's mainly bts actually. No worries though we know he's just a wagon hopper and a troll who will go to the grave holding onto his rookie cards.

 

I'm also really confused how cheap Rogers are being. Considering the ridiculous spike in viewership and sales last year, seems like perfect opportunity to invest and announce themselves as dedicated to the team. Give themselves a good guy image and a great report with fans. We can all look up the salaries nowadays and see how they are spending the same 140 as last year.

Posted
Very dissapointed in Shapiro. Ima drink till my liver hurts

 

Ya gonna get drunk and get punched in MAAHFACE..see what I did there? Yeah very disappointing, with the right moves this would be a WS favourite. Will be lucky to win a Wildcard at this point.

Posted
There's a lot to be said for having a full rotation in place when it's still November. Doesn't mean that you can't pursue other opportunities but at least it means that you don't get caught with your pants down at the end of the off-season (which has happened to the Jays more than once). The fact that Happ has pitched here before probably made him more willing to sign early with the Jays and there's probably some wisdom in capitalizing on that. His floor is J.A. Happ, his ceiling is J.A. Happ Pittsburgh version. That's not a bad guy to sign especially with no compensation involved. Not sexy but not unsound. Will be interesting to see what the rest of the off-season brings. I expect we'll see better depth 1 through 25 and 26 through 40 than we saw under AA.
Posted
Doubt they go with the current rotation. Anyone else think Dickey is getting dealt? I mean they basically have a good #2 young pitcher and 4 veteran #4's, not bad but hopefully they can do a bit better.
Posted
Well at the beginning of the offseason, we thought maybe Price/Shark/Zimmerman, instead, we got Chavez and Happ..I bet you all didn't see that one coming!

 

If you thought Price was coming back you're delusional.

Community Moderator
Posted
Well at the beginning of the offseason, we thought maybe Price/Shark/Zimmerman, instead, we got Chavez and Happ..I bet you all didn't see that one coming!

 

Anyone who expected a major pitching signing has paid no attention to the way Shapiro does things. I'm sure they touched base on Kuma and Lackey, received no mutual interest, then moved to plans C,D, and E.

Posted

Under AA's 4 deep rotations:

 

"Needs more depth! Too fragile! Can't have shitbags like Laffey in there!"

 

Shapiro's deep rotation:

 

"Needs an ace! Should have spent a few hundred million more on Price!"

 

people don't like being happy

Posted
Doubt they go with the current rotation. Anyone else think Dickey is getting dealt? I mean they basically have a good #2 young pitcher and 4 veteran #4's, not bad but hopefully they can do a bit better.

 

Dickey is valuable. 200 innings of that knuckleball effect goes a long way for 10 million.

Posted
Anyone who expected a major pitching signing has paid no attention to the way Shapiro does things. I'm sure they touched base on Kuma and Lackey, received no mutual interest, then moved to plans C,D, and E.

 

Lackey said he prefers the N.L.

Posted
Doubt they go with the current rotation. Anyone else think Dickey is getting dealt? I mean they basically have a good #2 young pitcher and 4 veteran #4's, not bad but hopefully they can do a bit better.

 

Dealing Dickey would really simplify the roster construction. Not having to decide between potentially hurting Russel's production by having him catch Dickey or finding a new caddy would be really nice. I'd love this if the right deal is out there but the teams that need a guy like Dickey are teams just like the Jays.

Posted
If you thought Price was coming back you're delusional.

 

I'm delusional to think this team wants to sign one of the top pitchers in the FA market that we traded one of our top prospects for last season? Price has and will be one of the top pitchers in baseball for years to come, and please don't tell me this team didn't have enough money. Rogers can see what a competitive team does to attendance.

Posted
So you have faith that Happ's next 3 seasons will mirror his 2015 one? Curious.

 

I gave you the projection for his next season...

Community Moderator
Posted
Under AA's 4 deep rotations:

 

"Needs more depth! Too fragile! Can't have shitbags like Laffey in there!"

 

Shapiro's deep rotation:

 

"Needs an ace! Should have spent a few hundred million more on Price!"

 

people don't like being happy

 

The current rotation is a 3+ win guy, four league average guys, and a 6th starter who could be anywhere from 1-3 wins without surprising anyone. All of this with no contracts longer than three years, no picks given up, and only Hendriks shipped out. This rotation isn't even bad.

Posted
Dickey is valuable. 200 innings of that knuckleball effect goes a long way for 10 million.

 

That's the whole point. He is a nice piece and other teams would want him. I'm not going to suggest trading Goins for a solid player lol.

Posted

I'm satisfied with the rotation less than a month into the off-season. It's five-strong with a solid sixth guy no matter how the workload gets divided (Hutch or Chavez becoming a swing man, for instance). Even if nothing else happens w/r/t pitching, we'll at least see guys who can throw a solid outing every turn. Not exactly a ringing endorsement, but it's a good foundation to move forward with, especially considering the wrecking ball offense.

 

Could be better, could be a lot worse. Solidifying a foundation shouldn't be poo-pooed, though. If we go five more months with nothing doing then some criticism is probably warranted. But as of now, there's not a whole lot to dislike.

Posted
Happ could be the under the radar #2 starter we needed. Who knows how Zimmerman could have performed in the AL...could have been worse than Happ.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...