Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 "Devon Travis has been a pleasant surprise. He's the MVP of the team, came instead from Detroit and had a stunning first month. He's amazing" "Travis is doing the heavy work until guys like Edwin, Saunders and I take the usual pace." "Reyes's injury affects us all, He's a very important player to our aspirations to make the playoffs"
ScientificReason Verified Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 "Devon Travis has been a pleasant surprise. He's the MVP of the team, came instead from Detroit and had a stunning first month. He's amazing" "Travis is doing the heavy work until guys like Edwin, Saunders and I take the usual pace." "Reyes's injury affects us all, He's a very important player to our aspirations to make the playoffs" Yeah good luck with that.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Author Posted April 30, 2015 Yeah good luck with that. Travis and Donaldson can't pitch!!
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Let's enjoy this moment, because it's probably the apex of his career productivity.
ScientificReason Verified Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Travis and Donaldson can't pitch!! Maybe give it a go lol. Travis has been a pleasant surprise though.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Author Posted April 30, 2015 Let's enjoy this moment, because it's probably the apex of his career productivity. I don't think so. He's just hittitng 191 wRC+.
Governator Community Moderator Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Imagine Travis sucked. Or not even sucked, just did as expected or slightly worse...If he were hitting .250 with 0 HR to this point it would go mostly unnoticed, it being so early and with many other players who were expected to carry the load hitting around .200. But imagine that were the case, how bad would we be? lol I don't want to think about it.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Imagine Travis sucked. Or not even sucked, just did as expected or slightly worse...If he were hitting .250 with 0 HR to this point it would go mostly unnoticed, it being so early and with many other players who were expected to carry the load hitting around .200. But imagine that were the case, how bad would we be? Not only that, but how about Pillar? He's had at least 2 games that I recall where his glove saved us from losing. His bat has been meh, but it's been very clutch and he's had a few games here or there with key runs. We're extremely lucky that the schedule has the AL East teams facing each other so frequently this early on to only make us 2 games behind 1st.
xposbrad Verified Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Travis will most likely be one of the few bright spots in what will inevitably be another disappointing season for the Jays.
Candide Verified Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Travis will most likely be one of the few bright spots in what will inevitably be another disappointing season for the Jays. to salvage the season, would you make the following trades: i) Pentecost, Nay, and Jimenez for Papelbon ii) Hoffman, Castro, and Urena for Hamels
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 to salvage the season, would you make the following trades: i) Pentecost, Nay, and Jimenez for Papelbon ii) Hoffman, Castro, and Urena for Hamels put down the crack pipe sir.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 to salvage the season, would you make the following trades: i) Pentecost, Nay, and Jimenez for Papelbon ii) Hoffman, Castro, and Urena for Hamels wat
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 to salvage the season, would you make the following trades: i) Pentecost, Nay, and Jimenez for Papelbon ii) Hoffman, Castro, and Urena for Hamels Lol.. I wouldn't do Hoffman for Hamels straight up.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Lol.. I wouldn't do Hoffman for Hamels straight up. Why not?
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Why not? Hoffman projects to be a dominant #1 and will provide similar value to Hamels as soon as next year. Why the f*** would i pay a 31 year old NL pitcher $23M a season through 2018 when i have a f***ing stud under control for the next six years?
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Hoffman projects to be a dominant #1 and will provide similar value to Hamels as soon as next year. Why the f*** would i pay a 31 year old NL pitcher $23M a season through 2018 when i have a f***ing stud under control for the next six years? projection and actual realization are most likely going to be different. Don't take prospect valuation as gospel
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 projection and actual realization are most likely going to be different. Don't take prospect valuation as gospel This kid is the real deal, #1 overall talent.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 This kid is the real deal, #1 overall talent. Alright, get ready for disappointment if you're expecting that
xposbrad Verified Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 to salvage the season, would you make the following trades: i) Pentecost, Nay, and Jimenez for Papelbon ii) Hoffman, Castro, and Urena for Hamels That would completely deplete the Jays system. On the one side, Papelbon/Hamels give the Jays a realistic chance of competing for a playoff spot. But those are moves that should have been made in the offseason without costing all the high end prospects the Jays have. I don't think it would be a wise gamble at this point considering they might possibly need 2 high end starters and not making the playoffs would set this team back quite a bit.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Author Posted April 30, 2015 to salvage the season, would you make the following trades: i) Pentecost, Nay, and Jimenez for Papelbon ii) Hoffman, Castro, and Urena for Hamels Get out of here Amaro!!
abola2121 Verified Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Hoffman projects to be a dominant #1 and will provide similar value to Hamels as soon as next year. Why the f*** would i pay a 31 year old NL pitcher $23M a season through 2018 when i have a f***ing stud under control for the next six years? My biggest fear is that if the team continue to struggle, and the noose around AA's neck tightens, he could end up pissing away half our farm system for Hamels just to save his own ass.
BTS Community Moderator Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 I like Jeff Hoffman as much as the next guy, but the kid has never played a pro game. Past top-10 lists are littered with pitchers far more accomplished than him that never lived up to the hype: Brian Matusz, Neftali Feliz, Jeremy Hellickson, Matt Moore, Shelby Miller, Dylan Bundy and so on and so forth. If a rival GM values Hoffman anywhere close to where some people on this forum do, he's very likely most valuable to the team as a trade chip.
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 I fully expect AA to plant Hoffman in the BP next year if he's still here.
Laika Community Moderator Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 I fully expect AA to plant Hoffman in the BP next year if he's still here. By next year do you mean September?
jaysblue Old-Timey Member Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 This kid is the real deal, #1 overall talent. How many times have we heard that with young arms before?
BTS Community Moderator Posted April 30, 2015 Posted April 30, 2015 Even if that's true, his value is higher than Hamels anyway. His value to the team might not be. You just have to make a few assumptions: - Hamels is a 3-4 win upgrade this year, which is likely the difference between playoffs and no playoffs - Hamels at 5/110 is better value than the team feels they can acquire via the FA market next year - Hamels' salary can be accommodated going forward - The team's experts have no concerns about his health going forward Absent any context, Hoffman is the more valuable asset, but it's not that difficult to see a situation in which he's moved for Hamels and everyone is happy with it 3-4 years down the road.
Gorlak Verified Member Posted May 1, 2015 Posted May 1, 2015 I wouldn't trade Hoffman for Hamels straight up, I would rather acquire papelbon for mostly cash. Hoffman could be in the rotation by next year and they can also get an ace in the offseason, since no one else needs to be paid.
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted May 1, 2015 Posted May 1, 2015 By next year do you mean September? Playoff push.
jays76 Verified Member Posted May 1, 2015 Posted May 1, 2015 We're in a really precarious position right now and I think Hamels & Papelbon could push us over the edge to contend (even for a couple years) but that's a lot of prospects. It would suck giving up Hoffman too but I'd consider it if they took the same package minus one of those prospects (say Urena) and ate a satisfactory amount of the combined 126M.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now