S33n Verified Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Done with this team for a while, later boys!
JFD Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 there is just too much suck for this team to overcome.
pickoff22 Verified Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 I didn't say that, I said it's useless to look on past statistics to try and justify why you went with one pitcher over another Yes, why would we ever look at past performance. That would be useless.
o2cui2i Community Moderator Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 talk to juiced about a mod needing to approve an account 24 hours before it can post. it'll REALLY, REALLY help with the troll problem. something needs to be done.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 you're actually right here strand rate hovers around 75-80% I think it regresses to the mean generally I understand this, but I don't think it should factor into decision-making. Every batter either gets on or doesn't. What happened before McGowan faced Viciedo had no impact on the outcome. The mean is the mean, but Viciedo could have just as easily popped up. How does 75% strand rate get adjusted when the hitter is under .250 or struggles against righties? The matchup is always more important than watching for regression.
Convo Verified Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 16-year old calling me dumb. When I was watching baseball when you were a f***ing sperm. I'm sorry this isn't a first place baseball team. I don't care what the current standings say. It won't say first in September unless they get help. Help that both Baltimore and New York will get. ^this
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Author Posted June 29, 2014 16-year old calling me dumb. When I was watching baseball when you were a f***ing sperm. I'm sorry this isn't a first place baseball team. I don't care what the current standings say. It won't say first in September unless they get help. Help that both Baltimore and New York will get. Harold Reynolds and Mitch Williams are older than you (probably), and they're the amongst the most knowledgeable people in baseball right?
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 They're both f***ing idiots. But since when does being first place in June win you anything? This isn't f***ing A-ball. Wake up! first place means they're good enough to lead the division you dummy
GD Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 16-year old calling me dumb. When I was watching baseball when you were a f***ing sperm. I'm sorry this isn't a first place baseball team. I don't care what the current standings say. It won't say first in September unless they get help. Help that both Baltimore and New York will get. Congrats, you want a medal for being older than me? Give quantitative evidence that this isn't a first place baseball team beyond this multi week stretch. Pytho, expected run differential, base runs, and ACTUAL REALITY disagree with you. I understand this, but I don't think it should factor into decision-making. Every batter either gets on or doesn't. What happened before McGowan faced Viciedo had no impact on the outcome. The mean is the mean, but Viciedo could have just as easily popped up. How does 75% strand rate get adjusted when the hitter is under .250 or struggles against righties? The matchup is always more important than watching for regression. This is the right line of thinking imo. Identifying the key factors. Sample size, strand rate and other variables needing regression, and regressed platoon splits should be taken into consideration.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Author Posted June 29, 2014 Hey guys, remember when we lost to the lowly Twins early in the season? That Jays team sure did look doomed, because one series is enough to warrant a full blow up.
Candy Maldonado Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Thole? Is Dickey pitching in relief? Bautista PH for fat boy.
Slot Machine Verified Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 They're something like 26-34 not including that 19-4 run (in which every possible break went there way).
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Buehrle did great, the offense is terrible right now. Injuries and bad approaches are killing them right now
JFD Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Hey guys, remember when we lost to the lowly Twins early in the season? That Jays team sure did look doomed, because one series is enough to warrant a full blow up. yes I do and now we are 3-7 against them and the ChiSox combined. try to make a positive out of that.
BTS Community Moderator Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 They're something like 26-34 not including that 19-4 run (in which every possible break went there way). lol
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 They're something like 26-34 not including that 19-4 run (in which every possible break went there way). so we discount the 19-4 run because you want to prove they are a bad team?
1878NHLYR Verified Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Out with a whimper again, just not even making it difficult at the moment
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Author Posted June 29, 2014 They're something like 26-34 not including that 19-4 run (in which every possible break went there way). Yes, let's throw away parts of a sample size. Now I don't know if my math is right, but when the Rays don't lose games they have the best winning percentage in the league OMGzzzz!!!!
GD Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Lets use run differntial at the end of the season when it f***ing matters. This team went 20-4. You want to bring up numbers and want to argue whats sustainable? Are you f***ing kidding me? Because I'm clearly arguing that 20-4 is sustainable.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Hey guys, remember when we lost to the lowly Twins early in the season? That Jays team sure did look doomed, because one series is enough to warrant a full blow up. The low point for me was game two @ Pittsburgh.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now