Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Defensively? Cozart. He's steadier. He makes the plays you expect. All the time. As a former pitcher, that's far more important to the psyche of a pitcher than the occasional spectacular play.

 

And he doesn't go deep in the hole and do the "fun to look at, but fundamentally unsound" Derek Jeter jump throw, like in that clip.

 

Here's Cozart, doing it better ...

 

http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/6479266/v34438735/chccin-cozart-makes-backhanded-play-for-the-out

 

Thats pretty dumb reasoning. Any pitcher that has Simmonds at SS isn't going to have any mental lapses because they know they have the best SS in the game behind them.

Posted
Defensively? Cozart. He's steadier. He makes the plays you expect. All the time. As a former pitcher, that's far more important to the psyche of a pitcher than the occasional spectacular play.

 

Simmons:

http://i.gyazo.com/e15ec9fd521999b50385172dd928a088.png

 

Cozart:

http://i.gyazo.com/af866c8ea06e6de8e04512ac9cecda76.png

 

So not only does Simmons convert about the same amount (if not more) of plays he's expected to, he also makes the much more difficult plays a lot more often.

Community Moderator
Posted
Simmons:

http://i.gyazo.com/e15ec9fd521999b50385172dd928a088.png

 

Cozart:

http://i.gyazo.com/af866c8ea06e6de8e04512ac9cecda76.png

 

So not only does Simmons convert about the same amount (if not more) of plays he's expected to, he also makes the much more difficult plays a lot more often.

 

/debate

Posted
Simmons:

http://i.gyazo.com/e15ec9fd521999b50385172dd928a088.png

 

Cozart:

http://i.gyazo.com/af866c8ea06e6de8e04512ac9cecda76.png

 

So not only does Simmons convert about the same amount (if not more) of plays he's expected to, he also makes the much more difficult plays a lot more often.

 

What's the difference on each players # of defensive chances this year? That would probably explain the rankings

Posted
What's the difference on each players # of defensive chances this year? That would probably explain the rankings

 

If what the parenthesis show are the number of plays in each category, then it would appear that Cozart has had about 50 more routine plays while Simmons has had 14 more impossible plays.

Posted
If what the parenthesis show are the number of plays in each category, then it would appear that Cozart has had about 50 more routine plays while Simmons has had 14 more impossible plays.

 

That's why cozart is ranked higher than. That many more routine plays would outrank the 14 harder ones. People need to remember these rankings aren't absolute. They're just saying that these guys are having great defensive seasons, based on a set of certainly imprecise measures, of which cozart has had more chances and not made mistakes. They don't mean cozart is the best defensive SS.

Posted

Travis d'Arnaud may not last at catcher. Mets are discussing moving him to LF due to his frequent concussions:

 

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/baseballinsider/travis-arnaud-turned-keeper-ny-mets-save-concussions-blog-entry-1.1920941

 

Not that it's a big issue for the Mets.. they have Kevin Plawecki in the pipeline, who will likely push d'Arnaud off catcher anyway. Besides, d'Arnaud's defense behind the plate isn't good(-0.9 dWAR, -12 DRS).. so lousy that it makes Navarro look like Yadier Molina. It may be better for d'Arnaud to be moved to another position, especially considering his power bat is better suited for the OF than at C.

 

Oh, and the Mets called up top 2B prospect Dilson Herrera due to Daniel Murphy going on the DL.

Posted

d'Aranud's bat doesn't seem likely to play well in LF. At one point people used terms like "possible middle of the order bat" with regards to him, but that was a long time ago.

 

I guess keeping him healthy is the main priority now. But a career path of "4th outfielder" suddenly seems plausible for him. That's not what the Mets thought they were getting as half the package for their Cy Young winner.

Posted
d'Aranud's bat doesn't seem likely to play well in LF. At one point people used terms like "possible middle of the order bat" with regards to him, but that was a long time ago.

 

I guess keeping him healthy is the main priority now. But a career path of "4th outfielder" suddenly seems plausible for him. That's not what the Mets thought they were getting for their Cy Young winner.

 

True. But his frequent injuries behind the plate and Plawecki's development are close to forcing the Mets' hand. It makes you wonder if AA knew something about him when they traded him along with Syndergaard(who the jury is still out on and is unlikely to be called up until 2015.) for RA Dickey.

Posted
Travis d'Arnaud may not last at catcher. Mets are discussing moving him to LF due to his frequent concussions:

 

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/baseballinsider/travis-arnaud-turned-keeper-ny-mets-save-concussions-blog-entry-1.1920941

 

Not that it's a big issue for the Mets.. they have Kevin Plawecki in the pipeline, who will likely push d'Arnaud off catcher anyway. Besides, d'Arnaud's defense behind the plate isn't good(-0.9 dWAR, -12 DRS).. so lousy that it makes Navarro look like Yadier Molina. It may be better for d'Arnaud to be moved to another position, especially considering his power bat is better suited for the OF than at C.

 

Oh, and the Mets called up top 2B prospect Dilson Herrera due to Daniel Murphy going on the DL.

 

Framing stats which don't need a huge sample size to paint an accurate picture say d'Arnaud us an elite framer and those catching metrics you're citing are unreliable in small sample sizes. Even if he struggled with blocking pitches and throwing out runners the impact that has on the game is minor compared to how important framing is, i really don't see the point in moving him to left field, he's not that elite of a bat and there's a good chance he'll struggle defensively. And concussions aren't the only injury concern with him, he's had several issues with his back, they might get better without the workload of a catcher but it could also be a chronic thing no matter where he plays, afterall there are plenty of outfielders who have back problems. If i where Alderson i would keep him on at catcher and take the risk, because most if not all of TDA's value as a player requires him to stay behind the plate.

Posted
TDA LF = s***

 

His bat would still be better than most of the Mets OFs on the MLB team and in the minors, of which many are s*** offensively, but some have great gloves (i.e. Lagares)

Posted
True. But his frequent injuries behind the plate and Plawecki's development are close to forcing the Mets' hand. It makes you wonder if AA knew something about him when they traded him along with Syndergaard(who the jury is still out on and is unlikely to be called up until 2015.) for RA Dickey.

 

Jays were known to be very concerned about his injury history. Concussions, lower body injuries and hand injuries all by the time he got to AAA.

Posted
His bat would still be better than most of the Mets OFs on the MLB team and in the minors, of which many are s*** offensively, but some have great gloves (i.e. Lagares)

 

En resumen: Travis can't hit or catch the ball; and he's injury prone. Sounds like bust to me.

Posted
Framing stats which don't need a huge sample size to paint an accurate picture say d'Arnaud us an elite framer and those catching metrics you're citing are unreliable in small sample sizes. Even if he struggled with blocking pitches and throwing out runners the impact that has on the game is minor compared to how important framing is, i really don't see the point in moving him to left field, he's not that elite of a bat and there's a good chance he'll struggle defensively. And concussions aren't the only injury concern with him, he's had several issues with his back, they might get better without the workload of a catcher but it could also be a chronic thing no matter where he plays, afterall there are plenty of outfielders who have back problems. If i where Alderson i would keep him on at catcher and take the risk, because most if not all of TDA's value as a player requires him to stay behind the plate.

 

Elite framers don't matter if they keep getting foul tips hitting them in the head causing concussions, which d'Arnaud has a history of. Oh, and he has 12 PBs, and only has a CS% of 20%.

Posted
En resumen: Travis can't hit or catch the ball; and he's injury prone. Sounds like bust to me.

 

Well, he has hit a little (12 HR, 32 RBI, 26/54 BB/K ratio, .229/.292/.397).. but his poor defensive skills and injuries do scream bust. Yes, his pitch framing is good, but it's negated by his awful defense.

Posted
Well, he has hit a little (12 HR, 32 RBI, 26/54 BB/K ratio, .229/.292/.397).. but his poor defensive skills and injuries do scream bust. Yes, his pitch framing is good, but it's negated by his awful defense.

 

MadBum Hitta > Travis D Hitta

Posted
On the other hand, TDA's pitch framing does help the Mets pitching staff (all 5 starters have ERAs in the 3s). Still, PBs and SBs from him hurt, especially on an offensively challenged team like the Mets (near the bottom in many categories regarding hitting and SLG)
Posted
Well, he has hit a little (12 HR, 32 RBI, 26/54 BB/K ratio, .229/.292/.397).. but his poor defensive skills and injuries do scream bust. Yes, his pitch framing is good, but it's negated by his awful defense.

 

More like his bad defence is negated by his superior pitch framing..

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...