Averaged 91 wins a year for the last three years despite their homegrown young core completely imploding in on itself.
It's clear that Atkins was able to surround the core with a pretty damn strong team, now the question is how much blame should be put on Atkins for not identifying a rotten core, or is there something he's done/doing that is the cause of the core rotting?
You could also argue that Atkins did indeed suspect the core might fail somewhat, as not a single one of them have been extended to long term deals, and as a result this team might be able to pivot quickly from that core and start a retool beginning this year if things don't turn around.