Can someone explain the Mariners side of this to me? Assuming Storen refused his assignment, wasn't he about to become a free agent? Couldn't the Mariners have had a shot at Storen for league minimum? Why take on the Storen salary? The only money they are saving here is the league minimum it would have cost to sign Storen. Did they really want him so bad that they couldn't risk him possibly going to another team? Unless they were already planning to DFA Benoit and considered him a sunk cost or unless there was already an agreement in place before the Storen DFA this doesn't really make sense to me.