Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Terminator

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,573
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    98

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Terminator

  1. On one hand, $5.5 mil for a backup is expensive but the guy is a fringe starter worth 1.5 to 2 WAR so he's worth it. Especially when he can play defense pretty well and none of Vlad, Bo or Biggio seem too. The playing time and contender excuses sound like a way to cover for penny pinching to me. Galvis should have 0 say in where he plays. He knew he was signing a 1+1 deal with a rebuilding team with top notch IF prospects when he signed here.
  2. Lol you think the Jays are going to sign someone better than a guy coming off a 2 WAR year to be the backup MIF? I highly doubt that.
  3. You might be right but that's not a good sign for next year. I wouldn't even tender Drury. Dude is trash. Urena is even worse.
  4. Urena is atrocious. It'd be nice to at least fake like we're going for .500 next year.
  5. Add backup INF to the list of needs for this upcoming offseason.
  6. Oh ok so the option was getting burnt this year anyway a d the 1 game didnt matter?
  7. I do hope he gets a look. I'm just bothered that they burnt his option for 1 game. He'd be perfect to stash in AAA next year as the 5th OF but now he's going to have to break with the big league team. Tough to see that happening. We'll see.
  8. Thats good to see but it's going to be tough for him to find a path here. Pretty sure they burned his final option this year with that one game at the beginning of the year. Maybe he'll get a Sept call but its going to be hard for him to make the team next year. He sucks anyway I guess.
  9. Looks like next year's OF could be Fisher, Teoscar, Gurriel and Grichuk. Doesn't exactly look like a WS-winning OF but there's some upside there and it's cheap which should allow us to spend more on pitching. The problem I have with it is that while it's not horrific defensively I doubt it's very good either. Our infield defense kind of sucks ass with Vlad, Biggio and Bo. Throw in decent at best OF defense and the questions with our pitching and run prevention is probably going to be a major problem. At least Jansen is nails behind the dish.
  10. I think he does too. Off to a good start with the Astros though.
  11. So what is Sanchez doing? Is he throwing more curveballs again? If so either his nail is going to fall off soon or the Astros' med team really knows what's up.
  12. He had a 2.62 FIP!
  13. So what exactly is Houston doing with his pitch mix?
  14. Kevin Smith is starting to show a pulse. Up to a 100 wRC+ in AA after a horrible 3 month start.
  15. https://fantasy.fangraphs.com/hitters-to-watch/ Fangraphs lists Ryan Goins as a "Hitter to Watch"
  16. https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=sa3010692&position=3B/SS Orelvis Martinez is looking very good in his 100+ ABs so far in the GCL as a 17 year old. He'd probably be a guy worth monitoring even if he was 19. I'm impressed.
  17. I generally agree with this. You pay the most you'll probably get the player though we probably lose a lot of tiebreakers to teams.
  18. Just quit playing McKinney and Drury altogether and move Galvis to the bench and it should be fine.
  19. Report: Twins believed they could have outdone Mets' offer for Stroman https://www.thescore.com/mlb/news/1805705
  20. Yes, the younger guy with good plate discipline numbers in the lower minors has more upside than the 25 year old AAAA player who projects to strike out 30% of the time in the bigs. Stevenson also weighs next to nothing which I assume contributes to his s*** power. Could that develop more or at age 22 or is his body done developing? He also has a much lower floor as he could simply flame out the next time he's promoted whereas Fisher looks like he could be a solid bench player to me. Is this so bad? I'm all for learning if I'm wrong.
  21. -I like that we dealt so many guys. -Giles was a disaster, as to whose fault that is we will never know. -Didn't get a single Top 100 player though SWR could be that guy. If before the deadline I listed all the guys we acquired but didn't tell you how we got them I think most would be disappointed.
  22. Yeah could be. Not a big deal to lose him but he was mildly interesting. More upside than Fisher though he probably doesn't amount to much. Sanchez is a negative asset at his salary, he's due over another million and then next year he probably gets a raise to above 6 mil in arb? That's a non-tender to me. He's trash but the Astros might figure something out w him. Biagini is okay bullpen filler but he's going to start getting raises too. I get what you're saying. Stevenson is probably the only thing worth anything in our package. In the end it's just a trade where we shuffle around the timelines of C+ prospects probably.
  23. To me it seems like Atkins gets the meat of the trade right but f***s it up on the margins. The Mets should have given us another Top 15 guy and we shouldn't have given the Astros Stevenson, the trades would have been fine otherwise (and still might be) but it's just not great value. Instead of getting A- to B trades, we are doing B- to C trades. Atkins is like the dynasty owner who you agree with on a trade, but last minute you tell him you need a 2nd round pick because you know he'll accept and he does it.
×
×
  • Create New...