Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Terminator

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,879
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Terminator

  1. Well you're a robo ump extremist which is great but I bet the majority of fans, many of whom are casuals, are more or less ok with pitches like that being called balls. A majority of fans might not only accept that but are actually very in favor of pitches like that being called a ball. Also, I think you might be surprised on how often you could end up disagreeing with robo umps. I'm 100% in favor of them but even robo umps make some interesting calls once in a while.
  2. What? I'm talking about if the catcher sets up inside and the ball is low and away so he has to stab at it. Even if the pitch in that situation catches the corner, the ump will call it a ball but the Ump Scorecard will dock the ump for that call. I'd say most people are willing to accept the ump calling it a ball. Keep in mind this was said within the context of 43211234 saying there needs to be more nuance to Ump Scorecard's methodology. There's 4 misses on there where the ball BARELY touched the zone. I'm not really bothered by those calls so the ump's performance was probably better than the raw grades show.
  3. Do any of you fine gentleman subscribe to MiLB.tv? If so would you be willing to share your account for some venmo $$$?
  4. One thing that this doesn't account for is a borderline strike that's called a ball because the pitcher doesn't hit his spot. Most agree that the ump is probably right to call it a ball when the catcher has to scramble to receive the pitch, even if the ball does technically touch the strike zone.
  5. What the hell is going on with Franmil Reyes, dear god. In a redraft I'd drop his ass but I have him in a dynasty.
  6. They don't have a pinch hitter for Bradley? lol he's one of the worst hitters in baseball
  7. We are getting some lucky BABIP this game
  8. He'd have to crow hop to get it up into the OF stands. Best to just hit the cutoff man in the bullpen who can then relay up there for him.
  9. Good call! Tailor-made double play ball but he beat it out
  10. His game is adaptable. When he saw he was hitting cleanup he morphed into a patient power hitter.
  11. Well I think this is the plan with Springer. He's going to DH a lot and he's going to do it on day games after night games especially. That's causing some issues with the lineup today but I think it's important to rest him.
  12. Too bad Collins can't play 1B. That alone would make the lineup look better.
  13. Yeah this is a problem I run into sometimes in a league with fantasy baseball normies. I tend to not panic and hold onto my guys as they work through early season struggles but sometimes I can miss out on the new hotness. Overall it usually works in this league though.
  14. Has anyone weighing less than 120 pounds while standing over 6'3" ever batted cleanup before?
  15. He could be. He seems to be taking an extreme pull approach.
  16. I just saw that. Yikes.
  17. Yeah it's a dynasty league and Semien is my starter and suck serious ass. I also have Chris Taylor on my bench so no prob but I always like stashing a couple of multi-position upside plays on my bench if I can. It's probably an "if you really want to" situation but I think L54 if right, there are better options.
  18. Heineman and Katoh, yuck. Wacha is due to get lit up though. Looks like we are -130 which sounds about right.
  19. Is Espinal becoming viable in a 14-teamer?
×
×
  • Create New...