I think I finally figured out the WHY TAPIA question with inspiration from the Athletic article today from Eno Sarris about the value of swinging.
Basically:
- Swinging has negative value in most run environments. The teams that swing less, win more.
- Players demonstrate this with their actions but the best example is Alex Bregman saying "I only swing at pitches I think I can homer on"
- The only exception is in very low home run environments where teams that swing more start to win more. 2014 Royals an example, and apparently in 2014 the general trend of "swing less = win more" was reversed. Remember in 2014 MLB had the lowest HR numbers in like, 20 years, and that prompted them to probably juice the baseballs. When it is very hard to hit home runs, singles become relatively more valuable so swinging more starts to have value and teams start to value high contact swingers as opposed to patient sluggers.
I think perhaps Toronto knew about the ball and humidor changes in 2022 and thought they needed to diversify and bring in some higher contact swingers with speed, etc. Like 2014 Royals type of s***.
Note that the Yankees did the same s***, arguably, in bringing in Kiner-Kalefa.
I think this is the major premise under which ROCKET RAIMEL TAPIA was brought in. The team thought he would be a good hedge against a massive scoring environment change.
RESULTS TO BE DETERMINED IT IS STILL EARLY.
But yeah the HR rate is the lowest since 2014!