RobinThicc Verified Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Blair fwiw, says Jays offered 6 years around 125 million last season to Chapman. https://www.sportsnet.ca/mlb/article/why-reunion-with-matt-chapman-was-not-in-cards-for-blue-jays/
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 If he didn't want play here its a lot less upsetting news. But he said himself multiple times during the Season he wanted to re-sign. But if they knew all this "early" in the off-season how the f*** was IKF the fall back plan.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 If he didn't want play here its a lot less upsetting news. But he said himself multiple times during the Season he wanted to re-sign. But if they knew all this "early" in the off-season how the f*** was IKF the fall back plan. He may have sat back, watched how this off-season was playing out for Atkins, and then decided he didn't want to part of it.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 If he didn't want play here its a lot less upsetting news. But he said himself multiple times during the Season he wanted to re-sign. But if they knew all this "early" in the off-season how the f*** was IKF the fall back plan. Did you... did you... did you LOOK at the free agent 3B list? Everyone not pictured below is a retirement candidate, absolute bench player, or MiLB candidate. I would argue that Kike, Wendle, Solano, and Senzel also are bench options at best. Unless you are the Washington Nationals or something. Turner is not actually a 3B. Only in emergencies. Candelario got $45M. Urshela is 32+ coming off a broken pelvis or something. I also believe that exactly zero 3B were available for trade. Were there any rumours?
hanton Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 "Chapman, we’re told, turned down a contract extension of six years and about $125 million from the Blue Jays last season" presumably they offered that contract to him in April becaues he sucked the rest of the season
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 "Chapman, we’re told, turned down a contract extension of six years and about $125 million from the Blue Jays last season" presumably they offered that contract to him in April becaues he sucked the rest of the season that's why he looked like he was going to s*** himself every time he did a 400 foot flyout to CF
BatFlip Verified Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Chapman reportedly turned down a contract extension of six years and $125 million from the Jays in order to bet on himself this year: "If I was going to do something long-term, I was going to get the value I’m worth.".... Way to go Chappy, betting on yourself. If all goes reasonably well in San Fran and Oracle Park, maybe you'll land a contract offer of 5 years and $100 million next year at age 31. f*** Rogers Centre. This offseason is making perfect sense.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Chapman reportedly turned down a contract extension of six years and $125 million from the Jays in order to bet on himself this year: "If I was going to do something long-term, I was going to get the value I’m worth.".... Way to go Chappy, betting on yourself. If all goes reasonably well in San Fran and Oracle Park, maybe you'll land a contract offer of 5 years and $100 million next year at age 31. f*** Rogers Centre. This offseason is making perfect sense. Really just a bizarre misread of his own value, and more specifically the risk in his profile due to age and K rate.
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Chapman has his teammates to blame. He was the one on the roster who looks closest to a UFC fighter while most of his teammates look like doughboys. I mean, if you're going into the locker room every day in his peak shape and look around, you can't help but feel an inflated value of self worth.
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 that's why he looked like he was going to s*** himself every time he did a 400 foot flyout to CF Does he really think this is going to improve in San Francisco. The ball f***ing dies there at night lol.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Chad Green's stuff is really good.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Does he really think this is going to improve in San Francisco. The ball f***ing dies there at night lol. Yeah 3 year rolling park factors on statcast... Oracle Park is: 4th worst for HR 7th worst for Runs Even in 2023 Toronto had a higher park factor than Oracle for HR and Runs.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Does he really think this is going to improve in San Francisco. The ball f***ing dies there at night lol. I suspect he knows it won't improve in SF. But it seems he backed himself into quite a corner and took what he could get - from a team near his hometown/comfort zone.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Chad Green's stuff is really good. Interesting data. Assuming this is very similar to Eno Sarris s***... Yimi 2023 FF 96 mph, 13.9 IVB, 2506 rpm Yimi 2024 spring FF 96.8 mph, 15.3 IVB, 2572 rpm (probably not enough sample size to care, yet) Kikuchi 2023 FF 16.2 IVB 2024 spring FF 17.1 IVB Bassit 2023 SI 91.8 mph 2024 spring SI 90.4 mph Green 2023 FF 94.8 mph, 17.8 IVB 2024 spring FF 95.1 mph, 19.1 IVB Genesis Cabrera 2023 FF 95.8, 16.9 IVB 2024 spring FF 94.8, 18.2 IVB Pearson 2023 FF 97.8, 17.4 IVB 2024 spring FF 96.8, 16.3 IVB Manoah FF 2023 92.8, 16.2 2024 93.7, 16.5 (slider velo up a tick and movement up on both planes...) Danner, FF 2024, 96.8 with 16.9 IVB White, 2023 FF 93.8, 16 IVB 2024 FF 95.9, 16.1 IVB Bowden Francis 2023 FF 94, 17.9 IVB 2024 94.9, 18.1 IVB Richards 2023 FF 92.8, 20.1 IVB 2024 91.7, 18.5 IVB Pardinho 2024 FF! 95.2, 16.6 IVB WOW he is alive! And has some velo with okay shape! Troy Watson (who?) 2024 FF 98 mph. 14.6 IVB 2024 SI 98.4 mph wow gas. that's a dead zone IVB though. Devereaux Harrison 93.6, 15.8 IVB meh Luis Quinones FF, 91.5 mph 18 IVB promising ride... Chad Dallas FF 92.9, 15.2 IVB - this will get spanked. Zulueta SI, 96.4 mph threw one 4S and it had horrible IVB, guess he is a power 2S pitcher Juenger FF, 93.5, 17.1 IVB - could be good with a bit more ride Connor Cooke FF, 94.9 with 14.9 IVB (sad stats) SL, -19.2 horizontal break (I think this is godly...) Grayson Thurman FF, 91 mph 18 IVB (another IVB boy)
polar bear Verified Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 From May 1-onwards: Home: 81 wRC+, 222 PA, .156 ISO Road: 87 wRC+, 245 PA, .136 ISO Yeah, not sure if Chappy has the right mindset if he's blaming the RC for his bad numbers. Maybe it's injury, maybe it's decline, maybe it's a little of both. A bounce back wouldn't shock me if it was health related. Doesn't appear that the park was the reason behind it though. All these strike outs swinging or looking,had dick all to do with the shape of stadium. He just can’t admit,he was crap.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Is IVB something they can teach?
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Is IVB something they can teach? Only a little bit My understanding is that your general fastball shape is sort of set in stone as it's a function of your arm slot, mechanics, and certain genetic traits. So, outside of wholesale changes like a new arm slot you can't really take a fastball with poor shape and give it good shape. You can coach it up though.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 I don't know the actual buckets for IVB but it's something like this: 19+ = elite 18+ = good 16+ = bit above average Players/teams really want to avoid being in at 12-15 IVB zone, particularly if the velo is not good and the horizontal movement is typical. But this has crept up over time at the MLB level. 16 IVB today won't play like 16 IVB five years ago. Being weirdly LOW can also be good... you just want to be different.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Does he really think this is going to improve in San Francisco. The ball f***ing dies there at night lol. Also with his new oppo approach… could be a disaster
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Only a little bit My understanding is that your general fastball shape is sort of set in stone as it's a function of your arm slot, mechanics, and certain genetic traits. So, outside of wholesale changes like a new arm slot you can't really take a fastball with poor shape and give it good shape. You can coach it up though. I wonder how much of a change in arm slot you need to change your IVB. I could be wrong, but I think you can make minor adjustments to arm slots in an offseason (but I could totally be wrong). There must be something to this though. It's not like all these pitchers were in the same lab all winter long working on these changes under the supervision of Blue Jays staff. Some may have been, some may also just have been in labs that are pushing this (maybe all labs are). Is there any other explanation? I suspect sticky stuff can help improve IVB? Maybe the Jays invested in a black market company to develop some unique sticky stuff for them (that somehow isn't detectable)!
wilko Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 I wonder how much of a change in arm slot you need to change your IVB. I could be wrong, but I think you can make minor adjustments to arm slots in an offseason (but I could totally be wrong). There must be something to this though. It's not like all these pitchers were in the same lab all winter long working on these changes under the supervision of Blue Jays staff. Some may have been, some may also just have been in labs that are pushing this (maybe all labs are). Is there any other explanation? I suspect sticky stuff can help improve IVB? Maybe the Jays invested in a black market company to develop some unique sticky stuff for them (that somehow isn't detectable)! I heard it's a concoction of Pete Walkers head sweat mixed with big league chew and a few spit coughs from him after hitting the bar for a couple beers.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 I wonder how much of a change in arm slot you need to change your IVB. I could be wrong, but I think you can make minor adjustments to arm slots in an offseason (but I could totally be wrong). There must be something to this though. It's not like all these pitchers were in the same lab all winter long working on these changes under the supervision of Blue Jays staff. Some may have been, some may also just have been in labs that are pushing this (maybe all labs are). Is there any other explanation? I suspect sticky stuff can help improve IVB? Maybe the Jays invested in a black market company to develop some unique sticky stuff for them (that somehow isn't detectable)! Yeah minor ones Like, Chad Green is the obvious one. He had a spin direction of 12:45 in all of 2020, 2021, and 2022. In 2023 his spin direction was 1:00 (on a clock face). That doesn't seem like a big difference, 15 minutes on a clock face, but probably just means during his recovery he had not quite regained his release point, was a bit too low in 2023, so his spin direction was a bit worse than before. All of the above has a big SSS caveat. Maybe these guys all lose this over time. I dunno how consistent IVB is. FB Stuff is pretty sticky but you still probably need a few outings.
MikeM3 Verified Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 If you want a glossary of dead zone fastballs just look up anyone we acquired up until a year ago
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Yeah minor ones Like, Chad Green is the obvious one. He had a spin direction of 12:45 in all of 2020, 2021, and 2022. In 2023 his spin direction was 1:00 (on a clock face). That doesn't seem like a big difference, 15 minutes on a clock face, but probably just means during his recovery he had not quite regained his release point, was a bit too low in 2023, so his spin direction was a bit worse than before. All of the above has a big SSS caveat. Maybe these guys all lose this over time. I dunno how consistent IVB is. FB Stuff is pretty sticky but you still probably need a few outings. Wasn’t this the exact problem Berrios had in 2022? And then he bounced back 2023. Seems like it is correctable
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Wasn’t this the exact problem Berrios had in 2022? And then he bounced back 2023. Seems like it is correctable I don't think so... I don't think his stuff numbers changed much. He threw less 4 seamers and more 2 seamers. That was the big change. Some of it was just confidence (a good chunk of his poor 2022 was just bad luck). I think his 4S has just gotten worse over time relative to the league. I wonder if his sinker just complements his slurve a bit better, or tunnels with it better. Stuff+ grades in his career on the 4S and sinker are pretty close (96 and 97). To age well I think Berrios is going to have to try and become a wide arsenal guy or change his pitch mix every year.
Rimar Verified Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Chapman reportedly turned down a contract extension of six years and $125 million from the Jays in order to bet on himself this year: "If I was going to do something long-term, I was going to get the value I’m worth.".... Way to go Chappy, betting on yourself. If all goes reasonably well in San Fran and Oracle Park, maybe you'll land a contract offer of 5 years and $100 million next year at age 31. f*** Rogers Centre. This offseason is making perfect sense. The problem with Boras, is that he always want include options out after 1 -2 years. Basically if the player have a good season, he will screw up his team, and want test free agency again or blackmail to do it . I guess it's why teams didn't agreed for long term contracts with Bellinger, Chapman or Snell.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 I don't think so... I don't think his stuff numbers changed much. He threw less 4 seamers and more 2 seamers. That was the big change. Some of it was just confidence (a good chunk of his poor 2022 was just bad luck). I think his 4S has just gotten worse over time relative to the league. I wonder if his sinker just complements his slurve a bit better, or tunnels with it better. Stuff+ grades in his career on the 4S and sinker are pretty close (96 and 97). To age well I think Berrios is going to have to try and become a wide arsenal guy or change his pitch mix every year. I specifically remember someone posting a chart about his arm slot being lower in 2022, maybe that didn’t translate to the actual stuff though
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 The problem with Boras, is that he always want include options out after 1 -2 years. Basically if the player have a good season, he will screw up his team, and want test free agency again or blackmail to do it . I guess it's why teams didn't agreed for long term contracts with Bellinger, Chapman or Snell. Yeah definitely seems that the Jays don’t like the idea of opt-outs and uncertainty. Its why they’ll sign guys like IKF to 2 year deals and trade for guys with guaranteed control. Or pay higher for a 1 year deal (Turner, Belt, Semien, etc.)
glory Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 Yeah definitely seems that the Jays don’t like the idea of opt-outs and uncertainty. Its why they’ll sign guys like IKF to 2 year deals and trade for guys with guaranteed control. Or pay higher for a 1 year deal (Turner, Belt, Semien, etc.) I remember a few years ago Shapiro saying that he hates player options. Atkins did give one to Berrios so I guess maybe he's softened a bit on that stance, but otherwise I'd be surprised if the Jays gave a contract to a player with the structure that Bellinger and Chapman got.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 I remember a few years ago Shapiro saying that he hates player options. Atkins did give one to Berrios so I guess maybe he's softened a bit on that stance, but otherwise I'd be surprised if the Jays gave a contract to a player with the structure that Bellinger and Chapman got. I like that frame of thinking, too much risk on the team.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now