Laika Community Moderator Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 I don't understand this notion that umpires call an oval and "they don’t call that inside corner, and that outside corner. There’s a reason they don’t call it: because you can’t hit that." Can someone slow this down for me or something? They're suggesting they don't call the up and in pitch, or the low and away pitch because you can't hit those? WTF? Tbh the strike zone probably SHOULD be more of an oval instead of a square/rectangle. if we think the umps dont get calls right now an oval makes it that much more worse IMHO. I think the human brain would just be / is naturally better at calling a circle or oval it's sort of easy to imagine the centre of the zone and judge balls or strikes based on how far the pitch is from the middle it's not as easy to imagine a rectangle floating in space and judge whether or not a ball touched the corner of it the problem is that the circle or oval would be harder to define in writing. it's easy to define the floating rectangle in writing. hmmmm
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 I think the human brain would just be / is naturally better at calling a circle or oval it's sort of easy to imagine the centre of the zone and judge balls or strikes based on how far the pitch is from the middle it's not as easy to imagine a rectangle floating in space and judge whether or not a ball touched the corner of it the problem is that the circle or oval would be harder to define in writing. it's easy to define the floating rectangle in writing. hmmmm I suspect stats suggest there are areas of the strike zone that umpires 'miss' more than others. I always assumed this was due to human error and simply not being able to see the entire strike zone equally (as they have to try and look over the catcher). I never considered they may not call certain areas strikes because the hitter can't hit those pitches. You can't tell people "well I decided to not call that a strike (even though it met all the requirements of the strike zone, as per the rules of baseball) simply because I didn't think the batter could hit that pitch". That is so f***ing bizarre to me.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 I suspect stats suggest there are areas of the strike zone that umpires 'miss' more than others. I always assumed this was due to human error and simply not being able to see the entire strike zone equally (as they have to try and look over the catcher). I never considered they may not call certain areas strikes because the hitter can't hit those pitches. You can't tell people "well I decided to not call that a strike (even though it met all the requirements of the strike zone, as per the rules of baseball) simply because I didn't think the batter could hit that pitch". That is so f***ing bizarre to me. That’s why Im saying they should just change the official zone to an oval anyways, since that’s what’s currently being called
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 I suspect stats suggest there are areas of the strike zone that umpires 'miss' more than others. I always assumed this was due to human error and simply not being able to see the entire strike zone equally (as they have to try and look over the catcher). I never considered they may not call certain areas strikes because the hitter can't hit those pitches. You can't tell people "well I decided to not call that a strike (even though it met all the requirements of the strike zone, as per the rules of baseball) simply because I didn't think the batter could hit that pitch". That is so f***ing bizarre to me. Manfred could have said it better. Basically, the called strike zone is a bit different than the defined strike zone because of a process of natural evolution between hitters and pitchers and umps. The game ITSELF has more or less decided that certain corner pitches are not strikes, because everyone involved agrees it would be dumb if they are strikes. Trying to think of an example from another sport. The old "neighbourhood" play at second base in baseball used to be like this; umps would give the infielder the out even if they stepped over the bag. But they legislated that away. In hockey, players often technically ice the puck but as long as they were close to the red line the referees don't call it.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Manfred could have said it better. Basically, the called strike zone is a bit different than the defined strike zone because of a process of natural evolution between hitters and pitchers and umps. The game ITSELF has more or less decided that certain corner pitches are not strikes, because everyone involved agrees it would be dumb if they are strikes. Yeah that's fair. I'm just not so sure I agree that's what's happening. I still think you see that low and away pitch (which, depending on the pitcher and the pitch - certainly seems unhittable) called a strike regularly. I suspect the stats suggest the 'missed' strikes are typically in the 4 'corners' of the defined strike zone - but it's not like they miss them "all the time". At the end of the day - I think it's a fair point that the accuracy of umpires has improved dramatically over the past 25+ years and with more technology available to help train/improve umpires, there's certainly a possibility we are going to get accurate enough that we don't need to involve a robo ump system.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 I suspect stats suggest there are areas of the strike zone that umpires 'miss' more than others. I always assumed this was due to human error and simply not being able to see the entire strike zone equally (as they have to try and look over the catcher). I never considered they may not call certain areas strikes because the hitter can't hit those pitches. You can't tell people "well I decided to not call that a strike (even though it met all the requirements of the strike zone, as per the rules of baseball) simply because I didn't think the batter could hit that pitch". That is so f***ing bizarre to me. Agreed the up and in and down and away are 2 quadrons you want your pitchers to hit given the limited contact, that's the whole point, so stupid. lmao
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Brownie's locked in... he's open day ready, folks! Preach, brother!
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Yeah that's fair. I'm just not so sure I agree that's what's happening. I still think you see that low and away pitch (which, depending on the pitcher and the pitch - certainly seems unhittable) called a strike regularly. I suspect the stats suggest the 'missed' strikes are typically in the 4 'corners' of the defined strike zone - but it's not like they miss them "all the time". At the end of the day - I think it's a fair point that the accuracy of umpires has improved dramatically over the past 25+ years and with more technology available to help train/improve umpires, there's certainly a possibility we are going to get accurate enough that we don't need to involve a robo ump system. For the latter to happen, they need to eliminate the Umpshow douchecanoes, so it'd take forever, bring in the robo-umps.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 For the latter to happen, they need to eliminate the Umpshow douchecanoes, so it'd take forever, bring in the robo-umps. Well that's true and unfortunately the umpiring profession seems to draw in an unconceivably high number of douchecanoes. They need to work harder to weed these guys out in the minors.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 I dig this What a simple, but great idea.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Verlander to the DL with a low grade teres major strain. I'll be back - need to google teres major strain. Feels like it's a f***ing typo by The Score.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Just saw they sent Grayson down. Was basically guaranteed a spot if he didn’t suck. Wonder if they’ll manipulate it now, prob
jaysblue Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Verlander to the DL with a low grade teres major strain. I'll be back - need to google teres major strain. Feels like it's a f***ing typo by The Score. Damn that sucks. Could be out all of April.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Damn that sucks. Could be out all of April. At least.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 Just saw they sent Grayson down. Was basically guaranteed a spot if he didn’t suck. Wonder if they’ll manipulate it now, prob He was having an awful spring so I get it honestly
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Author Posted March 30, 2023 Yeah that's fair. I'm just not so sure I agree that's what's happening. I still think you see that low and away pitch (which, depending on the pitcher and the pitch - certainly seems unhittable) called a strike regularly. I suspect the stats suggest the 'missed' strikes are typically in the 4 'corners' of the defined strike zone - but it's not like they miss them "all the time". At the end of the day - I think it's a fair point that the accuracy of umpires has improved dramatically over the past 25+ years and with more technology available to help train/improve umpires, there's certainly a possibility we are going to get accurate enough that we don't need to involve a robo ump system. THis is the part that i liked the most and had to most questions about: "“Literally after every game, they get an email with the pitches they missed. They must log in and look at the ones they missed. And there’s commentary about how they missed, and why they missed." So .. what happens when guys miss the same pitches over and over and over and over again like Angel Hernandez? Reprecussions is not the right word, but what training or additional support are they mandated to take in order to get these calls more right in the future?
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Author Posted March 30, 2023 Verlander to the DL with a low grade teres major strain. I'll be back - need to google teres major strain. Feels like it's a f***ing typo by The Score. ANATOMY noun: teres major either of two muscles passing below the shoulder joint from the scapula to the upper part of the humerus, one ( teres major ) drawing the arm toward the body and rotating it inward, the other ( teres minor ) rotating it outward. Well, i learned something new today, had never heard of that before either.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2023 Posted March 30, 2023 He was having an awful spring so I get it honestly Yeah, can’t blame them
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 I think this is what Kikuchi had last year
Solaxys Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 https://streamable.com/pdg2c7 What a f***in catch.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 https://streamable.com/pdg2c7 What a f***in catch. Only good because he f***ed up the route so badly and stuck his glove out as a last ditch effort. Looks really cool, but more lucky than good
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 I think this is what Kikuchi had last year The Rockies newly extended closer is out with anxiety/the yips. That might be the most Colorado Rockies tweet I’ve ever read.
harvey16 Verified Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 The Rockies newly extended closer is out with anxiety/the yips. That might be the most Colorado Rockies tweet I’ve ever read. Colorado, where pitchers careers go to die.
Pendleton Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 Why only five games tonight with three being late starts and none being Blue Jays, why? Why why why?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 21 SB's yesterday, the most since 1907 on opening day.
BTS Community Moderator Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 21 SB's yesterday, the most since 1907 on opening day. I love that speed is going to be a bigger part of the game
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 21 SB's yesterday, the most since 1907 on opening day. I was shocked that Chappy was the only one to even attempt a steal. I thought that 3-2, 1 out count with KK on 2nd and Bo on 1st would have been an absolute no-brainer (at least Vladdy beat out the double play, but still...)
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 31, 2023 Posted March 31, 2023 I was shocked that Chappy was the only one to even attempt a steal. I thought that 3-2, 1 out count with KK on 2nd and Bo on 1st would have been an absolute no-brainer (at least Vladdy beat out the double play, but still...) Chapman's seemed like a hit and run
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP The 19-year-old top prospect has made 16 High-A starts. He is 3-2 with a 2.92 ERA. In 61 2/3 innings, he's walked 35, but he's struck out 83 batters. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts