Buster Verified Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 I think Atkins and maybe also Shapiro are learning what every other Jays gm learns eventually: this ownership and these fans would never tolerate a Rays style organization. Ruthlessness in terms of thinking of players as assets is often in direct opposition of using those same players for marketing purposes.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 I think Atkins and maybe also Shapiro are learning what every other Jays gm learns eventually: this ownership and these fans would never tolerate a Rays style organization. Ruthlessness in terms of thinking of players as assets is often in direct opposition of using those same players for marketing purposes. This is utter ********, and false.
Buster Verified Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 This is utter ********, and false. It's too consistent to be a coincidence
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 It's too consistent to be a coincidence Pulled directly out your butt, lol.
Buster Verified Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 Pulled directly out your butt, lol. The only other explanation for their inability to manage assets properly is incompetence... But I don't think that's the whole story. I think the management of the Jays is given marching orders to always win now.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 The only other explanation for their inability to manage assets properly is incompetence... But I don't think that's the whole story. I think the management of the Jays is given marching orders to always win now. Dude... you said this... I think Atkins and maybe also Shapiro are learning what every other Jays gm learns eventually: this ownership and these fans would never tolerate a Rays style organization. Ruthlessness in terms of thinking of players as assets is often in direct opposition of using those same players for marketing purposes. Out of your ass.
Buster Verified Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 Dude... you said this... Out of your ass. I dont view it as a particularly controversial point. The org has bare cupboards for a reason.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 I dont view it as a particularly controversial point. The org has bare cupboards for a reason. So now we move goal posts? I don't get it, not happy either but....
Buster Verified Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 So now we move goal posts? I don't get it, not happy either but.... Moving goalposts? My point isn't complicated. The management of this organization cannot properly maximize assets because they are under constant pressure to win now from ownership. It's easier to make bold decisions on players when nobody is paying attention.
jaysblue Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 If there is someone who can maximize assets, it's William.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 Moving goalposts? My point isn't complicated. The management of this organization cannot properly maximize assets because they are under constant pressure to win now from ownership. It's easier to make bold decisions on players when nobody is paying attention. Point taken, but that's not how I took your comment. Cheers.
Buster Verified Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 Point taken, but that's not how I took your comment. Cheers. All good. I probably didn't make my point clearly.
wamco Verified Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 You did fine. At this point, You just have to talk to him like you would talk to Antonio Brown. Cue the 3rd post in a row where he calls me old despite being 10 years younger than him.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 You did fine. At this point, You just have to talk to him like you would talk to Antonio Brown. Cue the 3rd post in a row where he calls me old despite being 10 years younger than him. f*** you old man, pig.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 I assume yesterday's win was because Schneider made all the right moves
wilko Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 I assume yesterday's win was because Schneider made all the right moves Of course.
jaysblue Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 I assume yesterday's win was because Schneider made all the right moves Edit: Atkins made all the right moves.
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 I assume yesterday's win was because Schneider made all the right moves He kept the f*** ups to a minimal and it helped tremendously.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 I assume yesterday's win was because Schneider made all the right moves Need an 'Extend John Schneider' Thread for when things go well. Balance is important. Mr. Miyagi taught us this.
wilko Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 Need an 'Extend John Schneider' Thread for when things go well. Balance is important. Mr. Miyagi taught us this. Wax on wax off.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 I assume yesterday's win was because Schneider made all the right moves I found it funny that they decided to pinch run Espinal with KK and not Kirk. Clearly they had PTSD from that Friday game. Did they forget that Espinal was recovering from a leg injury??? Too funny
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 I found it funny that they decided to pinch run Espinal with KK and not Kirk. Clearly they had PTSD from that Friday game. Did they forget that Espinal was recovering from a leg injury??? Too funny That was interesting to say the least. This seems to point to the baseball adage that a non-tying run "doesn't mean anything". I've always thought that this was incredibly dumb as if you don't score the other runs that precede the tying run, you have no shot to score the tying run in the first place.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 That was interesting to say the least. This seems to point to the baseball adage that a non-tying run "doesn't mean anything". I've always thought that this was incredibly dumb as if you don't score the other runs that precede the tying run, you have no shot to score the tying run in the first place. Well yeah but you can somewhat assume that if the runner on first scores that the runner on second will too, right? What scenarios are there where KK scores from first and Kirk doesn't from second? I'm sure there are some but they are remote, hence the non-tying runs not meaning anything is basically true. It being the 8th inning instead of the 9th makes it slightly less true as well as entering the 9th down one is better than being down two. But still, that was the inning to make things happen.
wamco Verified Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 If anything, Kirk should be pinch running for other people with his blazing speed and ballet-like footwork.
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Author Posted June 12, 2023 Here's the best pen in baseball according to fWAR vs the Jays. The gap in fWAR is about 3 wins... but are they really all that different??? HR rate.... that's it.
bluejaysinternNo5 Verified Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 Here's the best pen in baseball according to fWAR vs the Jays. The gap in fWAR is about 3 wins... but are they really all that different??? HR rate.... that's it. Damn turns out giving up home runs is extremely bad. All jokes aside that is interesting. What’s the league average home run rate?
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Author Posted June 12, 2023 Damn turns out giving up home runs is extremely bad. All jokes aside that is interesting. What’s the league average home run rate? HR/FB is usually around 10%
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 This appears to show that the Jays relievers have been victimized by quite a few home runs which barely left the park. I do find it a little confusing though. With Swanson in particular, he's shown to have given up 4 home runs in total. This system classifies 4 of them as doubters, as they would have only left in 1-7 parks. The part where I'm not following is that he's also classified as having 3 home runs that were mostly gone, as they would have left 8-29 parks. Then at the same time 1 of them was classified as a no doubter. I don't understand how a player can have allowed 4 home runs, all of which were classified as doubters, 3 of which as mostly gone, and 1 of which as a no doubter. Each home should only be classified once right?
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 Well yeah but you can somewhat assume that if the runner on first scores that the runner on second will too, right? What scenarios are there where KK scores from first and Kirk doesn't from second? I'm sure there are some but they are remote, hence the non-tying runs not meaning anything is basically true. It being the 8th inning instead of the 9th makes it slightly less true as well as entering the 9th down one is better than being down two. But still, that was the inning to make things happen. I don't think its safe to assume anything with Kirk running the bases
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP The 19-year-old top prospect has made 16 High-A starts. He is 3-2 with a 2.92 ERA. In 61 2/3 innings, he's walked 35, but he's struck out 83 batters. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now