Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 431
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Yeah I know you guys on here have a hate on for Gaston, but you can't just say the Jays won those 2 championships in spite of him, or whatever the argument is. Winning is not just about having a good team on paper.

 

I repeat my question, what did Bobby Cox do that made him so superior to Gaston as a manager?

 

ETA: it was over 25 years ago, SO you can not judge how he managed the team then by the way the game is played today

 

Yes you can.

Posted
Come on man, anyone would've have won with a roster like those.

 

that's the 'conventional wisdom' around here BUT the same could be said for a lot of teams that instead underperformed expectations. for example, just how was it the A's juggernaut of late '80s-early '90s only won 1 WS? I would never s*** on a manager who has a record of winning championships, because it is so hard to win just 1. was Gaston just lucky - I don't think so, but sure helped to have Gillick behind the scenes at the top of his game

Posted
Yes you can.

 

Sure you can say that (I stand corrected), but what EXACTLY is your rationale for that and are you saying essentially that it really doesn't matter who is the manager?

Posted
that's the 'conventional wisdom' around here BUT the same could be said for a lot of teams that instead underperformed expectations. for example, just how was it the A's juggernaut of late '80s-early '90s only won 1 WS? I would never s*** on a manager who has a record of winning championships, because it is so hard to win just 1. was Gaston just lucky - I don't think so, but sure helped to have Gillick behind the scenes at the top of his game

 

It's a hard thing to quantify, so you never know. As good as the A's were, the Jays had much more consistent hitters. I remember guys like Canseco going ice cold during one of those A's playoff runs. I recall injuries playing a factor as well.

 

The manager role is a hard thing to quantify, so it's basically an exercise in futility trying to do so. But as I recall, Cito wasn't known for much in game strategy. He had the set batting order, vets would player every day and he'd just sit back. I suppose not over-managing is a good trait, but I'm definitely one who thinks that Cito is a little overrated, at least when it comes to Canadian baseball fans.

Posted
It's a hard thing to quantify, so you never know. As good as the A's were, the Jays had much more consistent hitters. I remember guys like Canseco going ice cold during one of those A's playoff runs. I recall injuries playing a factor as well.

 

The manager role is a hard thing to quantify, so it's basically an exercise in futility trying to do so. But as I recall, Cito wasn't known for much in game strategy. He had the set batting order, vets would player every day and he'd just sit back. I suppose not over-managing is a good trait, but I'm definitely one who thinks that Cito is a little overrated, at least when it comes to Canadian baseball fans.

 

yeah nice summary.... but 2 WS championships still speak volumes. It's almost like trying to poke holes in Bruce Bochy because he hasn't won since 2014

Verified Member
Posted

Dumb fans need to vent because team is so bad, need a single person to blame... insert manager.

 

Loses that Montoyo has been responsible for:

Posted (edited)
Dumb fans need to vent because team is so bad, need a single person to blame... insert manager.

 

Loses that Montoyo has been responsible for:

 

I don't see too much scapegoating of Montoyo going on here. The main issue that he has been roasted over is the excessive sac-bunting. Other than that maybe some instances of being too quick on the trigger pinch running, and other minor issues.

Edited by wk680
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Yeah I know you guys on here have a hate on for Gaston, but you can't just say the Jays won those 2 championships in spite of him, or whatever the argument is. Winning is not just about having a good team on paper.

 

I repeat my question, what did Bobby Cox do that made him so superior to Gaston as a manager?

 

ETA: it was over 25 years ago, SO you can not judge how he managed the team then by the way the game is played today

 

Winning is literally about having a good team on paper

Old-Timey Member
Posted
yeah nice summary.... but 2 WS championships still speak volumes. It's almost like trying to poke holes in Bruce Bochy because he hasn't won since 2014

 

How about Citi being the reason that John Olerud and Shawn Green wanted out of the org? Also, explain to me why he didn't dare so well in his second go around?

Posted
How about Citi being the reason that John Olerud and Shawn Green wanted out of the org? Also, explain to me why he didn't dare so well in his second go around?

 

A manager is only as good as his bad decisions. The more he makes, the less likely the team can outplay them.

 

Montoyo has made some bad decisions that cannot be outplayed by this team. With the age of this group I would have hired someone a little better pedigree.

Posted
I am starting to think Montoyo is in over his head....young team needs a lot of guidance, and t keep them focused

The problem is he has zero managing experience. Jays took a gamble on that

Posted
At what point should we start pointing fingers at Guillermo Martínez, who also has zero experience as batting coach??
Posted
At what point should we start pointing fingers at Guillermo Martínez, who also has zero experience as batting coach??

 

Hitting coach is one of the most overrated positions in baseball. It's more of a hope that they don't mess up a guys swing than actually fixing it. Plus putting in video time and exercises.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
At what point should we start pointing fingers at Guillermo Martínez, who also has zero experience as batting coach??

 

Two months of a hitting coach working with AAAA players and people are pissed he hasn’t turned them into the Astros

Posted
Two months of a hitting coach working with AAAA players and people are pissed he hasn’t turned them into the Astros

AAAA?? Is that one level above Triple A?? :D

Old-Timey Member
Posted
AAAA?? Is that one level above Triple A?? :D

 

You've never seen the term before? It's used for players that mash AAA but can't hack at it the MLB level for whatever reasons.

 

See: Brandon Wood, A.J. Reed, and Travis Snider.

Posted
You've never seen the term before? It's used for players that mash AAA but can't hack at it the MLB level for whatever reasons.

 

See: Brandon Wood, A.J. Reed, and Travis Snider.

 

Socrates Brito :confused:

Posted
You've never seen the term before? It's used for players that mash AAA but can't hack at it the MLB level for whatever reasons.

 

See: Brandon Wood, A.J. Reed, and Travis Snider.

No, I've never heard of that term before. But thanks for enlightening me

Posted
Winning is literally about having a good team on paper

 

 

Over the long haul of a 162 teams that's obviously almost always true, but in a shorter timeframe and the spotlight of the postseason things like intangibles and momentum start to play a bigger factor.

 

How about Citi being the reason that John Olerud and Shawn Green wanted out of the org? Also, explain to me why he didn't dare so well in his second go around?

 

Not all managers and coaches are going to get along. Gibby wasn't universally liked either. I can't really comment on the later part of Gaston's managing career post 2004, I lost interest in baseball during that period. But didn't the teams in his second managing stint (along with the end of his original tenure) mostly lack the player personnel to be competitive (even the best manager can only do so much with a bad team). Anyway I wouldn't put the guy up there as an all-time great manager, but winning championships does count for something. My question was and remains, what is so great about Bobby Cox with his postseason record of 67W - 69L

Posted
Over the long haul of a 162 teams that's obviously almost always true, but in a shorter timeframe and the spotlight of the postseason things like intangibles and momentum start to play a bigger factor.

 

 

 

Not all managers and coaches are going to get along. Gibby wasn't universally liked either. I can't really comment on the later part of Gaston's managing career post 2004, I lost interest in baseball during that period. But didn't the teams in his second managing stint (along with the end of his original tenure) mostly lack the player personnel to be competitive (even the best manager can only do so much with a bad team). Anyway I wouldn't put the guy up there as an all-time great manager, but winning championships does count for something. My question was and remains, what is so great about Bobby Cox with his postseason record of 67W - 69L

 

'Not getting along' with 2 of the most talented players to don the Blue Jays uniform is kind of a big deal...

Posted
Winning is literally about having a good team on paper

 

Those players still have to perform on the field.

 

Having the right players on paper improve the odds that your team will actually produce the desired outcome, but winning is not about what it says on a spreadsheet...The spreadsheet only tells you what already happened. They actually have to physically do it during the next game.

Posted
Those players still have to perform on the field.

 

Having the right players on paper improve the odds that your team will actually produce the desired outcome, but winning is not about what it says on a spreadsheet...The spreadsheet only tells you what already happened. They actually have to physically do it during the next game.

 

This is true hence projection, lol. New, bench players, Sp depth and RP's, beg to differ.

Posted
This is true hence projection, lol. New, bench players, Sp depth and RP's, beg to differ.

 

Projection = educated guess

 

It does not equal actuals.

 

Actuals = Actuals

 

If projections were 100% Vegas would be bankrupt.

Posted
Projection = educated guess

 

It does not equal actuals.

 

Actuals = Actuals

 

If projections were 100% Vegas would be bankrupt.

 

giphy.gif?cid=790b76115cebca9a724e4166734ae964&rid=giphy.gif

Posted
Projection = educated guess

 

It does not equal actuals.

 

Actuals = Actuals

 

If projections were 100% Vegas would be bankrupt.

 

Actually, Vegas isn't bankrupt because their models and projections are that good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...