Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
You mean the hundred years war where the French were trying to kick out the English, who occupied France and took place entirely within France?

 

I guess they didn't just surrender, so hurray.

 

We need a poll.

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

A bit of trivia to pass the time during the All-Star break:

 

In the last 30 season (1990-2019) there have been four qualified position players who have posted a season with a 200 or greater wRC+. Who are the four players? Hint: Two of these were during the strike shorted 1994 season. And one of these from 1994 was a bit surprising to me and led me to looking up who had posted 200+ wRC+ seasons.

Community Moderator
Posted
A bit of trivia to pass the time during the All-Star break:

 

In the last 30 season (1990-2019) there have been four qualified position players who have posted a season with a 200 or greater wRC+. Who are the four players? Hint: Two of these were during the strike shorted 1994 season. And one of these from 1994 was a bit surprising to me and led me to looking up who had posted 200+ wRC+ seasons.

 

Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Albert Belle, and Frank Thomas?

Verified Member
Posted
A bit of trivia to pass the time during the All-Star break:

 

In the last 30 season (1990-2019) there have been four qualified position players who have posted a season with a 200 or greater wRC+. Who are the four players? Hint: Two of these were during the strike shorted 1994 season. And one of these from 1994 was a bit surprising to me and led me to looking up who had posted 200+ wRC+ seasons.

 

One of them was definitely Jeff Bagwell in 1994. I remember stumbling upon his bb-ref and being shocked at his 1994 season. It was insanely good. Put up 8 something WAR in the strike shortened season and also won MVP I believe.

Posted
One of them was definitely Jeff Bagwell in 1994. I remember stumbling upon his bb-ref and being shocked at his 1994 season. It was insanely good. Put up 8 something WAR in the strike shortened season and also won MVP I believe.

 

Yep, you got the last one.

Posted
Joey Belle?

 

You know, on a peripheral note, I saw Joey Belle play in London, Ontario back in 1989 when, for five years, the Detroit Tigers had their Double-A team there. I remember him taking a slow stroll away from the batter's box between pitches, something which didn't bother me at the time but now would drive me nuts. He also hit a ball that not only cleared the left-field fence at Labatt Park but went into the Thames River.

 

https://www.tradingcarddb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/66346/cid/4638580/1989-Star-Canton-Akron-Indians-25-Joey-Belle

Community Moderator
Posted
Ooh I didn't even realize there was a game tonight.

 

I wouldn't have started my players if not for this post. Your value to this forum is immeasurable.

Posted
I wouldn't have started my players if not for this post. Your value to this forum is immeasurable.

 

Well now you owe me.

Posted
Bregman just took a bad hop right off the chin.

 

He kept pointing and bringing up his jaw to the trainer. Not sure if he had a concussion but he was pretty shaken up from it.

Posted
He kept pointing and bringing up his jaw to the trainer. Not sure if he had a concussion but he was pretty shaken up from it.

 

That was brutal. Direct hit.

Posted
Handsome Jake got 2 games for that collision at home plate with Lucroy.

 

Seems fair. If it was deliberate (and it looked like an accident) he would have got a lot longer.

Posted
Seems fair. If it was deliberate (and it looked like an accident) he would have got a lot longer.

 

Wait, so it was not deliberate but let's give him 2 games.. If it is deliberate much more? I am not following the rational.. There shouldn't be a punishment solely for the sake of optics. It should be is he guilty or not. If no intent, nada!

Posted
Wait, so it was not deliberate but let's give him 2 games.. If it is deliberate much more? I am not following the rational.. There shouldn't be a punishment solely for the sake of optics. It should be is he guilty or not. If no intent, nada!

 

If it was intentional he would receive a lengthy suspension. This way they're acknowledging that he didn't mean to injure Lucroy or even necessarily barrel into him but they are punishing his recklessness and deterring any future attempts.

Posted
Wait, so it was not deliberate but let's give him 2 games.. If it is deliberate much more? I am not following the rational.. There shouldn't be a punishment solely for the sake of optics. It should be is he guilty or not. If no intent, nada!

 

Even though you didn't mean to do something doesn't mean that what you did was wrong.

Posted
Wait, so it was not deliberate but let's give him 2 games.. If it is deliberate much more? I am not following the rational.. There shouldn't be a punishment solely for the sake of optics. It should be is he guilty or not. If no intent, nada!

 

What I think it boils down to is this.

 

Was Marisnick trying to intentionally hurt Lucroy? No. I don't think so.

 

However, I do believe that the play was on the reckless side. I think that if there was intent, or MLB believed that there was intent, you're looking at double digit games. The 2 games is to make the point that players need to be in control of their bodies. There has to be more care/caution given than what we saw from Marisnick. You can't be completely out of control or someone could get hurt...which is exactly what happened.

Posted
If it was intentional he would receive a lengthy suspension. This way they're acknowledging that he didn't mean to injure Lucroy or even necessarily barrel into him but they are punishing his recklessness and deterring any future attempts.

 

I am trying to understand why it is reckless a runner giving 100% hustle towards the plate to score a run. Then the non-intentional theory: The runner sees the catcher's body move in one direction, the runner tries to move in the other direction to avoid, the catcher's body, tag and still be able to touch home plate. After committing to one direction (momentum and such forces in affect) the catcher then switches the direction of his body and goes back towards the opposite side where the runner had already committed.

 

Who defines reckless? What is reckless? Hustling, running as fast as you can 110% effort is reckless because you will not be able to shift your direction/momentum with adequate leeway? All runners must run at no more than 85% so as to allow sufficient time to shift direction to avoid injury?

 

It is a very slippery slope to define reckless, but no intent in that play.. The runners job is to avoid a tag and touch home plate.

 

Reckless in driving a vehicle is driving 40 mph over the posted speed limit when it is foggy and slippery and through a school zone etc... There are clearly defined parameters in this case that, one there is a posted speed limit, poor visibility, slippery surfaces, and a school zone.. You are f***ed!

 

What are the parameters in baseball? Catcher can't block the plate, and runner can't intentionally barrel over the catcher. That is it..

 

So back to my original point. He either ran into him intentionally, long suspension. Or it was in the normal course of baseball when the catcher shifted back to a side the runner had already committed.. Accidents.. s*** happens.. Why a suspension?

Posted (edited)

Pretty special night in Anaheim, Angels in the OF.

 

Wow... Kelly Nash broke down interviewing Trout, I don't blame her, that was crazy emotional.

Edited by Spanky99
Posted
Relief ace Colin Poche of the Rays has 27 strikeouts (22% SwStr rate) and 1 walk in his first 17.1 IP. He also has an absurd 17.1% GB%.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Is it too much to ask for the Angels to actually make the playoffs so that Trout can get a bit more exposure in his prime? I mean I'd hate if he was on the Yankees since it would hurt the Jays, but that would have been amazing for baseball. He's wasting his career in Anaheim.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...