Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Is it gay to ask other men to suck your cock? If you are asking someguy for the enjoyment, then I would say yes Allen. I am asking to cause someone else displeasure and I am very secure in my hetrosexuality, so I am exempt from being gay. Not that there is anything wrong with that. Well, unless you are a gay ginger. That is just not fair and wrong God did that to you....
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Just seems like there are a lot of other ways to cause someone displeasure without putting your cock in their mouths. I'm just asking the question.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Is it gay to ask other men to suck your cock? Ask Donaldson...
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Use all the metrics you want. Which Blue Jays pitcher in the rotation or on the DL has been consistently better this year? Not one of you has disproven this. I have never discussed Borucki with you nor I recall any threads about this that I have seen. Credibility and the way a bunch of you act are two seperate and distinct issues. A bunch of you are fnnn posters on a Jays message board, not even proffesional baseball people or in the business in any form, yet you consistently talk down to posters and insult them for putting their opion. I have never insulted anyone or talked down to them for a baseball opion. I notice that when I look at the board there are sometime hundreds of people online. Yet there probably less then 20 frequent posters. I have a strong feeling it is a bunch of you act like Dicks and people dont want to post here. You act like a Dick, I will call call you a Dick. Post something supporting why I am f***ed up 5 ways to Sunday, I will call you John or say thank you. The arrogance some of you have that you are so high and mighty baseball gurus that you cant even bother to respond to position with nothing less then an arrogant and Dickish one word or sentance smart ass remark. So, again, who of the Blue Jays starters this year or on our roster have been consistently better then Borucki???? There are no fnnn stats 1950’s or 2025 that support that he has not. So again, if we had to go to war with what we have. I would put him in the #1 spot, where anyone would want their most consistently GOOD pitcher. From the Blue Jays page, posted tonight. Blue Jays to allow 3 hits or fewer in 4 straight starts. Ryan Borucki Roger Clemens Jose Guzman Marco Estrada The OP stated out of our pitchers we have or if we were miracously starting the playoffs today with what we have, I would want Borucki #1. As an aside, how old were some of you guys when the Blue Jays had a decade of winning teams and two World Series champions? Still sucking on momies titty? Playing spin the bottle? You are probably going to tell me Jack Morris and Juan Guzman sucked because Sabremetrics says so. Number of posters here who were very into sabremetrics and advanced analysis who became swiftly employed by pro baseball organizations: 2 Number of posters here who think speedy/slappy hitters are ireal leadoff men and pitchers like Borucki are #1 pitchers because ERA and stuff who have been swiftly hired by pro baseball organizations: 0 Enjoy the flat earth bud. I feel for you. My empathy for your willful ignorance is legitimate. But as they say, ignorance is bliss.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Number of posters here who were very into sabremetrics and advanced analysis who became swiftly employed by pro baseball organizations: 2 Number of posters here who think speedy/slappy hitters are ireal leadoff men and pitchers like Borucki are #1 pitchers because ERA and stuff who have been swiftly hired by pro baseball organizations: 0 Enjoy the flat earth bud. I feel for you. My empathy for your willful ignorance is legitimate. But as they say, ignorance is bliss. 3 actually
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 3 actually Oh ya, forgot about him. 3 - 0
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 (edited) Okay? He's been excellent, but he hasn't been the best pitcher in the American League. The fact that he's 21-5 should have zero bearing on his candidacy for the Cy Young. Would you take Blake Snell over deGrom? um...no? I'm just saying the guy's been pretty damn impressive this year. Sure he's had some 'luck' behind him, but if he finishes the season with a 1.90 ERA, it would be the second lowest ERA in the AL in the past 40 years (2000 Pedro 1.74). Believe me - I love advanced stats. They are great indications as a pitchers true talent and to predict their future success; however, I don't think you can't totally eliminate the actual results. I find it hard to penalize Snell for being 'lucky' this year. And really, here are the FIP and xFIP for the top AL pitchers Verlander - 2.85, 3.08 Cole - 2.71, 2.98 Snell - 2.98, 3.16 Carrasco - 2.98, 2.90 Severino - 2.95, 3.08 The only standout pitcher in the AL has been Sale (1.98, 2.28). I'd probably buy the argument that he should win it despite only throwing 153 innings. He's only 0.1 WAR behind the AL leader in Verlander. Edited September 24, 2018 by Brownie19
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Is he a troll or for real? I thought some of the Mirage and Gurribabip homers were bad.. You know who I am, I was one of the most frequent posters at Future Jays/Scout since the mid-2000s until something happened to the site. I know you, Krylian and Metafor, not sure who else is here. Had some of the same debates. However posters posted a substantiace agrument why the other poster was “wrong” or f***ed up.
Pendleton Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 um...no? I'm just saying the guy's been pretty damn impressive this year. Sure he's had some 'luck' behind him, but if he finishes the season with a 1.90 ERA, it would be the second lowest ERA in the AL in the past 40 years (2000 Pedro 1.74). Believe me - I love advanced stats. They are great indications as a pitchers true talent and to predict their future success; however, I don't think you can't totally eliminate the actual results. I find it hard to penalize Snell for being 'lucky' this year. And really, here are the FIP and xFIP for the top AL pitchers Verlander - 2.85, 3.08 Cole - 2.71, 2.98 Snell - 2.98, 3.16 Carrasco - 2.98, 2.90 Severino - 2.95, 3.08 The only standout pitcher in the AL has been Sale (1.98, 2.28). I'd probably buy the argument that he should win it despite only throwing 153 innings. He's only 0.1 WAR behind the AL leader in Verlander. Now I'm curious to know the lowest numbers of innings thrown by Cy Young winners.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 You know who I am, I was one of the most frequent posters at Future Jays/Scout since the mid-2000s until something happened to the site. I know you, Krylian and Metafor, not sure who else is here. Had some of the same debates. However posters posted a substantiace agrument why the other poster was “wrong” or f***ed up. substantiace - a real word from a real language
Pendleton Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 substantiace - a real word from a real language CC Sabathia was a substantiace in his prime
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Number of posters here who were very into sabremetrics and advanced analysis who became swiftly employed by pro baseball organizations: 2 Number of posters here who think speedy/slappy hitters are ireal leadoff men and pitchers like Borucki are #1 pitchers because ERA and stuff who have been swiftly hired by pro baseball organizations: 0 Enjoy the flat earth bud. I feel for you. My empathy for your willful ignorance is legitimate. But as they say, ignorance is bliss. Yes, I read those threads about guys getting offers/jobs etc. Unless I am very mistaken, none of the posters I was refering to including you are in those spots. They are not the posters putting higher then thou remarks. Usually the best in their proffession are the humble ones. You also consistently twist my posts or have a low level of reading comprehension. You are Fake News! I made points that we had not had a true lead off hitter since Revere. I made points that Revere added an element to the 2015 team we did not have. Per AA if you dont think anything I say is worth a s***. I stated that low Ks and contact and speed are very important and needed in certain situations. Yet your FAKE NEWS fallback/narrative you want to spin on me is that I think Ben Revere is the best ever leadoff hitter and perfect example. Rickey Henderson is the best ever leadoff hitter and perfect example. Ben Revere was being discussed inthe context of the 2015, 2016 Blue Jay teams. Again, an example of your arrogance that since you dont agree on me on a Ben Revere thread from weeks ago that you dismiss something I post about a pitcher weeks later.. You are also deflecting.. You can take the time to post rebutals but have yet to substantiate why my point is f***ed up. If you would have just made a legit baseball point in the first point, we could have avoided Allen asking in a public forum if it is ok to ask another man to suck your dick. I am ready to talk baseball only and stop the personal narratives as soon as someone tells me why Borucki is not the best pitcher we have on the roster now based on performance this year- i.e most consistent..??
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 substantiace - a real word from a real language You got me! On my phone in Vegas where it is before 8 am and still waking up. I guess my opinion should be demeaned due to my f***ed up spell check, or lack thereoff.
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Yes, I read those threads about guys getting offers/jobs etc. Unless I am very mistaken, none of the posters I was refering to including you are in those spots. They are not the posters putting higher then thou remarks. Usually the best in their proffession are the humble ones. You also consistently twist my posts or have a low level of reading comprehension. You are Fake News! I made points that we had not had a true lead off hitter since Revere. I made points that Revere added an element to the 2015 team we did not have. Per AA if you dont think anything I say is worth a s***. I stated that low Ks and contact and speed are very important and needed in certain situations. Yet your FAKE NEWS fallback/narrative you want to spin on me is that I think Ben Revere is the best ever leadoff hitter and perfect example. Rickey Henderson is the best ever leadoff hitter and perfect example. Ben Revere was being discussed inthe context of the 2015, 2016 Blue Jay teams. Again, an example of your arrogance that since you dont agree on me on a Ben Revere thread from weeks ago that you dismiss something I post about a pitcher weeks later.. You are also deflecting.. You can take the time to post rebutals but have yet to substantiate why my point is f***ed up. If you would have just made a legit baseball point in the first point, we could have avoided Allen asking in a public forum if it is ok to ask another man to suck your dick. I am ready to talk baseball only and stop the personal narratives as soon as someone tells me why Borucki is not the best pitcher we have on the roster now based on performance this year- i.e most consistent..?? Keep typing dude. Me replying to you about baseball and trying to have a conversation of any substantiance is like Neil Degrasse Tyson trying to explain astrophysics to a poodle.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Keep typing dude. Me replying to you about baseball and trying to have a conversation of any substantiance is like Neil Degrasse Tyson trying to explain astrophysics to a poodle. You got me good also.. I get it, I am dum, you are so super smart that it is beneath you to waste your time on someone obiously ( in your world) not as smart as you. Ok, stay humble👍
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Now I'm curious to know the lowest numbers of innings thrown by Cy Young winners. Well it will be one of the closers that won it (Eck or Gagne) - so I don't think Snell or Sale should be penalized for not throwing 200 innings.
Pendleton Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Well it will be one of the closers that won it (Eck or Gagne) - so I don't think Snell or Sale should be penalized for not throwing 200 innings. Yeah the closer thing opens up another can of worms, but just in terms of starters, it would be interesting to see how many starts a guy can miss before it starts to hurt their chances of winning the CY.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 (edited) Yes, I read those threads about guys getting offers/jobs etc. Unless I am very mistaken, none of the posters I was refering to including you are in those spots. They are not the posters putting higher then thou remarks. Usually the best in their proffession are the humble ones. You also consistently twist my posts or have a low level of reading comprehension. You are Fake News! I made points that we had not had a true lead off hitter since Revere. I made points that Revere added an element to the 2015 team we did not have. Per AA if you dont think anything I say is worth a s***. I stated that low Ks and contact and speed are very important and needed in certain situations. Yet your FAKE NEWS fallback/narrative you want to spin on me is that I think Ben Revere is the best ever leadoff hitter and perfect example. Rickey Henderson is the best ever leadoff hitter and perfect example. Ben Revere was being discussed inthe context of the 2015, 2016 Blue Jay teams. Again, an example of your arrogance that since you dont agree on me on a Ben Revere thread from weeks ago that you dismiss something I post about a pitcher weeks later.. You are also deflecting.. You can take the time to post rebutals but have yet to substantiate why my point is f***ed up. If you would have just made a legit baseball point in the first point, we could have avoided Allen asking in a public forum if it is ok to ask another man to suck your dick. I am ready to talk baseball only and stop the personal narratives as soon as someone tells me why Borucki is not the best pitcher we have on the roster now based on performance this year- i.e most consistent..?? Lol are you kidding? One guy was so f***ing smug I constantly wanted to make him suck my dick. Edited September 24, 2018 by Boxcar
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Lol are you kidding? One guy was so f***ing smug I constantly wanted to make him sick my dick. The best lead off hitter is a really stupid thing actually. If used that way, a few players, Ruth, Gehrig, Williams, Bonds, Trout and others would be a better lead off hitter than Henderson. Wade Boggs was close to being better... and may have been better. There were many years that Henderson provided 10 baserunning runs, was infinitely better as a base runner, but Boggs was a better leadoff hitter because he got on base more. In the next few years lead off hitters as we traditionally think of them will end. The best hitter, will hit first, and the only time a speedy guy will hit first is if he is the best hitter, or so close that the analytics give him a big advantage because of his baserunning. Starter are also gone. Carlos Danger may someday see a lineup with Vlad at the top, Paulina starting and his other hero Borucki coming in at inning 2. Hopefully Carlos just enjoys it all because it will be a lot of fun, and Borucki may excel as an inning 2-3 to 4-6 pitcher.
DigitalRock Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 Lol are you kidding? One guy was so f***ing smug I constantly wanted to make him sick my dick. This sounds like some f***ed up s***.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 The best lead off hitter is a really stupid thing actually. If used that way, a few players, Ruth, Gehrig, Williams, Bonds, Trout and others would be a better lead off hitter than Henderson. Wade Boggs was close to being better... and may have been better. There were many years that Henderson provided 10 baserunning runs, was infinitely better as a base runner, but Boggs was a better leadoff hitter because he got on base more. In the next few years lead off hitters as we traditionally think of them will end. The best hitter, will hit first, and the only time a speedy guy will hit first is if he is the best hitter, or so close that the analytics give him a big advantage because of his baserunning. Starter are also gone. Carlos Danger may someday see a lineup with Vlad at the top, Paulina starting and his other hero Borucki coming in at inning 2. Hopefully Carlos just enjoys it all because it will be a lot of fun, and Borucki may excel as an inning 2-3 to 4-6 pitcher. See, this is a post that makes points supporting the guys opinion and doesn't demean another line of thought nor is it dismissive. A baseball post on a baseball forum. 👍
Daniel Labude Jays Centre Contributor Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 See, this is a post that makes points supporting the guys opinion and doesn't demean another line of thought nor is it dismissive. A baseball post on a baseball forum. This is a baseball forum?....how did I get here?
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 This is a baseball forum?....how did I get here? I was originally searching for midget porn. The results came back to here due to key words - Spanky, Midget, ( post about Marcus Stroman) and Box. It wasnt what I was originally hoping for.. However, I thought what the hell, I will give it a shot.. And here I still am......
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted September 24, 2018 Posted September 24, 2018 The love for me is astounding, I like my skin bruh!
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now