Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Her facial muscles don’t really move the way they should in a normal person. I can’t put my finger on it, but something looks off.

 

I think she's likely had countless Botox injections by this point. That might explain why her face lacks "normal" movements.

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I think she's pretty ugly. Wouldn't stop me from f***ing her if I'm desperate though.

 

I think she's likely had countless Botox injections by this point. That might explain why her face lacks "normal" movements.

 

lol

 

You bros, are 10's right?

Posted
You don't have to be a 10 to judge someone's looks.

 

I beg to differ, a realization of you should be prepared. I got lucky, but it was fun, jokes and looks, that squared it up. Each and every time.

Posted
I asked my bro who's a supermodel and he thinks she's ugly too.

 

lol... scared reality. You've been around for a long time. How old are you guys?

Posted
She's hot, ok? Because if you are saying Jackie Redmond isn't hot, then you are saying that I am not hot. Because obviously I am not as hot as Jackie Redmond!
Posted
She's hot, ok? Because if you are saying Jackie Redmond isn't hot, then you are saying that I am not hot. Because obviously I am not as hot as Jackie Redmond!

 

lulz

Posted
ITRL... there's some crazy quotes in here by Griffin, according to his sources, lol.

 

https://www.thestar.com/sports/bluejays/opinion/2018/08/13/as-focus-shifts-to-youth-josh-donaldson-no-longer-part-of-blue-jays-plans.html

 

 

 

This entire article is stupid, why would the Jays let him walk for nothing, lol.

 

I read it as Shatkins wants to trade JD now because they don't want to be forced to offer a QO and risk JD accepting it. Which still doesn’t make much sense as JD could rebuild value and be traded as soon as he has a good run of form.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
She's hot, ok? Because if you are saying Jackie Redmond isn't hot, then you are saying that I am not hot. Because obviously I am not as hot as Jackie Redmond!

 

Well done! I love that show

Posted
SRF and Pannone also.

 

In my opinion, if Gibby doesn't buy into this kind of scheme, it's one reason to legitimately part ways.

 

I realize Gibby has been a seemingly good sport about this, as we've seen several bullpen days, and one "opener" day (Clippard I believe) followed by a nice outing by some fringe guy (in Seattle, can't even remember the dudes name now).

 

However if Gibby doesn't believe in this, in his heart, that may be a reason to let him go. Just because if his heart isn't in it, he may not be able to implement the policy effectively. On the other hand if Gibby is all for this new wave stuff, maybe he stays.

 

In 2019 there will be a bunch of intriguing guys, but no one who is a top prospect, or has proven they can handle a conventional starters role effectively. Even Stroman, may not be able to handle 200 innings year after year. Sanchez, Stroman, Bourcki, SRF, Pannone, Perez, Zouch...

 

And what about Pearson?? Next year Pearson will be in a similar situation as Osuna and Miguel Castro were going into 2015. I beleive at least Osuna was mostly injured in 2014.

 

Could Pearson be an "opener" for 2019?? Could you get him 90-100 innings as an opener?? Maybe going every 3-4 days, 1-3 innings an outing depending on the situation?

Posted
Random thoughts here. But I'm sick and tired of seeing casuals saying Martin is crap and should retire when he's been a top 3 player on the squad this year with 2 WAR. They can't see past the BA and understand his OBP and his decent power almost make him an average hitter. I cringe so hard when I see people also saying the contract has been bad when they should be more than satisfied that a old catcher is more than worth his cost in the 4th year of the deal.
Jays Centre Contributor
Posted
Random thoughts here. But I'm sick and tired of seeing casuals saying Martin is crap and should retire when he's been a top 3 player on the squad this year with 2 WAR. They can't see past the BA and understand his OBP and his decent power almost make him an average hitter. I cringe so hard when I see people also saying the contract has been bad when they should be more than satisfied that a old catcher is more than worth his cost in the 4th year of the deal.

 

Most of what you say is on point....that said Martin is not good anymore. He needs to be a backup and help Jansen next year into becoming a force at C

Posted

Martin could actually provide some decent value next year in a utility role. The batting average has got to come up at least a little bit too. Hes a useful player, just maybe not a starting catcher for a contender anymore.

 

And as for the salary, ya it's high now. But we also paid him like 8 million dollars in the first year to be one of the best catchers in the game. The deal is heavily back loaded, it's not like hes getting paid 20million dollars to be a superstar right now

Posted
Martin could actually provide some decent value next year in a utility role. The batting average has got to come up at least a little bit too. Hes a useful player, just maybe not a starting catcher for a contender anymore.

 

And as for the salary, ya it's high now. But we also paid him like 8 million dollars in the first year to be one of the best catchers in the game. The deal is heavily back loaded, it's not like hes getting paid 20million dollars to be a superstar right now

 

I'd rather him hit .200/.350 than .260/.290

Posted
I'll take a 99 wRC+ from a catcher

 

With a WAR of > 1. Yeah, not bad for the second last year of an expensive contract. It's not like he's Pujols or Chris Davis. Or Tulo.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...