P2F Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 MLB Gameday's messed up right now. Mets beat Philly... on only 4 hits, half on Jay Bruce HRs.... while Conforto rots on the bench. And what's with the Reds? About to go to 5-2..neck and neck with the Cubs in the NL Central. But their pitching usage has been strange...Lorenzen and Reed pitched 3 innings tonight in the win. Are they doing this to try to work on their stuff so they can eventually be moved to the rotation? And Brett Cecil still sucks...In a word: yes.
P2F Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Dear Cinci...learn from what you saw tonight. Turn Lorenzen and Reed into 2 to 3 innings guys twice a week.I think Lorenzen's future is in the bullpen, though he could end up a very good, high-leverage arm. Cody Reed, on the other hand, has pretty legit stuff and deserves a fair shake to crack that rotation before the Reds go all Raisel Iglesias on him.
AdamGreenwood Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 What's wrong with this summary from MLB? "Padres first baseman Wil Myers went 4-for-4 with a double, a triple, a home run, two runs and two RBIs against the Rockies on Monday."
Laika Community Moderator Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 His changeup might be the best in baseball. It's so disgusting. It's basically a breaking ball he turns it over so much. Gyroball!
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 What's wrong with this summary from MLB? "Padres first baseman Wil Myers went 4-for-4 with a double, a triple, a home run, two runs and two RBIs against the Rockies on Monday." Nothing, unless you're complaining that they didn't point out that he hit for the cycle.
P2F Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 What's wrong with this summary from MLB? "Padres first baseman Wil Myers went 4-for-4 with a double, a triple, a home run, two runs and two RBIs against the Rockies on Monday." I'm pretty sure the single is implied there through the art of deduction.
Laika Community Moderator Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 8:40 PM EST: Jered Weaver goes to Coors
P2F Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 it's basically a breaking ball he turns it over so much. Gyroball! qft
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Was reading the Sports Illustrated baseball preview issue, as part of the profile of each team there's some comments from a rival team scout - can be quite interesting. One thing that stood out though - for the Royals the anonymous scout said that Hosmer is a potential MVP candidate! Can only assume it's the same Jays scout who thinks Smoak is worth a multiple year contract.
BTS Community Moderator Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 It's not just the change either. He gets tons of movement on his cutter too. And throws 95.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Was reading the Sports Illustrated baseball preview issue, as part of the profile of each team there's some comments from a rival team scout - can be quite interesting. One thing that stood out though - for the Royals the anonymous scout said that Hosmer is a potential MVP candidate! Can only assume it's the same Jays scout who thinks Smoak is worth a multiple year contract. Those scouting quotes are so stupid. The one on the Jays about Pillar made me laugh. "If the offense catches up to the defense he's Mike Trout." lol
BTS Community Moderator Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Those scouting quotes are so stupid. The one on the Jays about Pillar made me laugh. "If the offense catches up to the defense he's Mike Trout." lol Did someone write that this offseason?
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Did someone write that this offseason? Yeah an opposing anonymous scout wrote it in the Sports Illustrated Baseball Preview. For each team preview they have a blurb written by an opposing scout and that's what he said about Pillar.
BTS Community Moderator Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Yeah an opposing anonymous scout wrote it in the Sports Illustrated Baseball Preview. For each team preview they have a blurb written by an opposing scout and that's what he said about Pillar. Yikes
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Yeah an opposing anonymous scout wrote it in the Sports Illustrated Baseball Preview. For each team preview they have a blurb written by an opposing scout and that's what he said about Pillar. This is why I stat scout...listening to actual scouts must be painful at times.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Those scouting quotes are so stupid. The one on the Jays about Pillar made me laugh. "If the offense catches up to the defense he's Mike Trout." lol Haha, to be fair I assume he meant that he's so good on defense that an equivilent offence would be Trout level.
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Forbes came out with the valuations of each MLB club today. Yanks leading the charge at 3.7B, nearly a full billion ahead of the Dodgers. Jays came in 16th at 1.3B https://www.forbes.com/mlb-valuations/list/#tab:overall
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Yuliesky sucks http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-astros-might-need-a-first-baseman/
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Haha, to be fair I assume he meant that he's so good on defense that an equivilent offence would be Trout level. It's true, if Pillars offense was as good as his defence, he would be BETTER than Trout. Problem is, it NEVER will.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Yuliesky sucks http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-astros-might-need-a-first-baseman/ What a shame they don't have a stud 1st baseman down on their farm...
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Haha, to be fair I assume he meant that he's so good on defense that an equivilent offence would be Trout level. Yeah I know it was just poorly worded but the way he said it made it sound like he had a chance.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Forbes came out with the valuations of each MLB club today. Yanks leading the charge at 3.7B, nearly a full billion ahead of the Dodgers. Jays came in 16th at 1.3B https://www.forbes.com/mlb-valuations/list/#tab:overall There's a chance that'll put the Yankees back above Real Madrid and Barcelona as the top valued sports team in the world when the overall figures are updated.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Pedro Martinez is in love with Jharel Cotton and vice versa lol
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 To be fair, Gurriel isn't the only one in Houston struggling.. outside of Springer and utilityman Marwin Gonzalez, the Astros haven't shown much offense. Altuve's off to a slow start, as is Bregman.. and Reddick's swing is still stuck in Oakland.. and FYI, Houston with RISP is nearly as bad as Toronto (so far).. and Toronto's not the worst--that honour belongs to the Kansas City Royals.. it's been a long fall for a team that was killing the ball 2-3 years ago and winning 90+ games...
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Haha, to be fair I assume he meant that he's so good on defense that an equivilent offence would be Trout level. yeah and if my aunt had a dick she'd be my uncle. It's embarrassing that a professional scout would say that - and that a reputable magazine like SI would print that drivel.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 yeah and if my aunt had a dick she'd be my uncle. It's embarrassing that a professional scout would say that - and that a reputable magazine like SI would print that drivel. No I think he was saying it to demonstrate how good the defence is, albeit in a clumsy way, rather than saying Pillar's offense would or could improve.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 In case you're wondering who's the best with RISP: http://www.espn.com/mlb/stats/team/_/stat/batting/split/39/sort/avg/order/true Jays 29th.. 3 other supposed contenders are also struggling with RISP in the Astros, Mariners.. even Cleveland (really need Kipnis back ASAP).. and Arizona's #1, which explains their strong start.. Of course, it's a very small sample size, and things can change in a week or two.. As for pitching with RISP: http://www.espn.com/mlb/stats/team/_/stat/pitching/split/39/sort/opponentAvg/order/false It may not be a reliable stat, but Cleveland is REALLY struggling to hold runners... of course, it doesn't help they just played Texas and Arizona..two very strong offensive teams. Minnesota is doing a good job keeping runners at 2nd and 3rd from scoring.. did anyone really expect this? Once again, it's a small sample size.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Boyd no-hitting the Twins thru 5... but taking a lot of pitches to do so. Meanwhile, the Tigers are basically swinging at everything Santiago throws.. only 48 pitches thru 4 innings.
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP The 19-year-old top prospect has made 16 High-A starts. He is 3-2 with a 2.92 ERA. In 61 2/3 innings, he's walked 35, but he's struck out 83 batters. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts