Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

We had Saunders and Bautista out there this season. In the grand scheme of things it'll be fine.

 

Plus there's ways around it. Rotate Pearce and Bautista between 1B and RF.

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
NEW YORK METS TRADE RUMORS: FRONT OFFICE REGRETS PICKING UP JAY BRUCE OPTION

 

Link: http://www.inquisitr.com/3859293/new-york-mets-trade-rumors-front-office-regrets-picking-up-jay-bruce-option/

 

Of course they do, because its Jay f***ing Bruce.

 

Nows the time to strike if they want a Liriano type deal for Bruce. Smoak for Bruce + 1 or 2 prospects. We'll take the salary. Then sign Bautista and you're golden.

 

Smoak for Bruce and Nimmo. Sign Valbeuna and collect the 1st rounder for Jose

Posted
Smoak and Bruce are so similar right now. Both guys were signed as overpaid security blankets and both contracts turned into a complete waste when the market on bat first players completely cratered. Chris Carter and Jose Bautista are much better players and neither even has a job.
Posted (edited)

Smoak is a sunk cost. If he's a stumbling block for a genuine upgrade then I'm really disappointed. They're letting the Smoak problem just compound itself to hurt 2017.

 

They extended him to avoid being frozen out of 1B bidding wars, but there are no bidding wars and upgrades are/were everywhere (Bautista, Carter, EE, Moss, Napoli)

Edited by intentional wok
Posted
Smoak is a sunk cost. If he's a stumbling block for a genuine upgrade then I'm really disappointed. They're letting the Smoak problem just compound itself to hurt 2017.

 

They extended him to avoid being frozen out of 1B bidding wars, but there are no bidding wars and upgrades are/were everywhere (Bautista, Carter, EE, Moss, Napoli)

 

This is a really good point. They were worried that EE wouldn't come back, and that they'd be forced to pay over the odds for a 1B if Smoak left too. So they secured Smoak early.

 

2 things have changed since then:

 

Smoak has gone from average to DFA standard since signing his contract;

 

the 1B market never took off, it'd be easy to get another 1B even now.

Posted

Smoak wastes a 25 man spot by being only a 1B, not good enough to start every day, and not good enough to DH.

 

IMO that's more harmful than throwing away $4m for 2 years.

Posted
Hard pass on Brandon Nimmo.

 

Why? He's a solid prospect, walks, doesn't strike out a lot, and should play above average defense. He'll probably be more of an average big leaguer rather than a star, but that's okay.

Posted
I would take Bruce + a prospect for Smoak

 

I'd probably do Bruce for Smoak straight up. You'd be getting Bruce for just under 9M this year, plus saving Smoak's 4M next year.

Posted
They did lose James Loney at 1B, and he's pretty comparable to Smoak. Except Smoak is a switch hitter. I can see the Mets taking him for depth.
Posted
I'd probably do Bruce for Smoak straight up. You'd be getting Bruce for just under 9M this year, plus saving Smoak's 4M next year.

 

Same. Bruce is actually a useful lefty bat who can play the OF (albeit, very poorly). Much more useful to this team than Justin Smoak.

Posted
You guys wanna add a horrible defender who is making more money than the guy you're trading? I'd rather roll with Carrera
Posted
I don't want Bruce under any circumstance I can think of.

 

If they're giving him away maybe he's worth a look as a last resort. But in no way should they get him, a couple relievers (not the ones who signed) and think they had a successful offseason. It's been pretty pathetic since the season ended, other than the Gurriel signing.

Posted
Aren't Flores and Duda still on the mets for 1b ?

 

Yes, Smoak would be redundant for the Mets, but Bruce is already redundant for the Mets too. Logic would be take the cheaper useless piece, I guess.

Smoak at 4+4 may be easier to swallow on their payroll than Bruce at 13+0. It's +9 savings this year and -4 next year, but even if they have to hold Smoaky all year, they may be able to sneak him into a deal next offseason as a salary offload since $4 million is a bit easier to sneak into a deal. It's hard for a team to absorb $13, but $4 is doable.

Posted

 

 

Ian Hunter

‏@BlueJayHunter

Earlier today, Stephen Brunt told @Sportsnet960 that Blue Jays developments could happen by end of week - "I'm told things are cooking."

 

Ian Hunter

‏@BlueJayHunter

Brunt when asked whether these developments could be Bautista-related or other - "I would say other".

Posted
That's really vague. Could mean a small signing, could mean a big trade.

 

I kinda hope it's both. Valbuena is the small signing and Blackmon or Puig is the big trade :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...