saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Well depending how much salary they are eating for Clay. The Red Sox just opened up room to sign Edwin. That seems a strong possibility...makes me sick to my stomach
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 And of course the Phillies ate the entire contract. Expect to hear Edwin to the Red Sox soon. Zero chance that happens. Sox only made the deal to get under the tax. Dombrowski is indicating no deals are imminent.
Captain Adama Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Are there seriously not boards for other teams with the same traffic and activity as this one? Of course. We're not that special, it's not like we have a real life celebrity that posts on our board.
Rusty_Savage Verified Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Of course. We're not that special, it's not like we have a real life celebrity that posts on our board.
Rusty_Savage Verified Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Also no way EE goes to Boston, imo. His options seem limited. If I had to put money on it, I would say Texas or Seattle
Frenchsoup Verified Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Also no way EE goes to Boston, imo. His options seem limited. If I had to put money on it, I would say Texas or Seattle I disagree with this. DD hasn't been known to be a passive pussy.
P2F Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I think Detroit is another logical landing spot for Edwin, so Ilich can try for his World Series before it's too late. I know there currently isn't anywhere for him to play on that roster, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them to try to fit him in.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Texas seems like such a logical place for EE at this point.
Rusty_Savage Verified Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I disagree with this. DD hasn't been known to be a passive pussy. Your right but I would think getting under the tax threshold has more to do with ownership wanting to be under it then DD being a passive pussy. I may be wrong though. Just don't see it
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Your right but I would think getting under the tax threshold has more to do with ownership wanting to be under it then DD being a passive pussy. I may be wrong though. Just don't see it There's a huge financial incentive to get under the threshold and reset the clock. Penalties get worse if you're over for multiple years but all it takes is a single season to reset that clock.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I think Detroit is another logical landing spot for Edwin, so Ilich can try for his World Series before it's too late. I know there currently isn't anywhere for him to play on that roster, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them to try to fit him in. Nope. Avila's ordered payroll to be slashed in Detroit, so forget it. Plus, V-Mart and Cabrera are blocking his spots at 1B and DH. Plus, Detroit is too far over the tax to even think about making a move for Edwin.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Texas seems like such a logical place for EE at this point. Out of the question--Texas is at $171.354M(based on the CBT payroll) and can't take on any more money.
jays_fever Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I think Detroit is another logical landing spot for Edwin, so Ilich can try for his World Series before it's too late. I know there currently isn't anywhere for him to play on that roster, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them to try to fit him in. Where would he play, CF?
jaysblue Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Where would he play, CF? V-Mart used to catch haha.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Also no way EE goes to Boston, imo. His options seem limited. If I had to put money on it, I would say Texas or Seattle Texas is tapped out, Seattle isn't realistic--Mariners need OFs and more bullpen help and can't exactly afford Edwin's deal, and really want to give Dan Vogelbach a chance to win the 1B job. Plus, Nelson Cruz is better used as a DH than a OF..
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 V-Mart used to catch haha. Which he can no longer do due to knee issues, plus the fact he's 38 and basically a DH/1B at best now.
jays_fever Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 http://68.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvpgyrMqt21qdz3dz.gif
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Out of the question--Texas is at $171.354M(based on the CBT payroll) and can't take on any more money. I love how the link you included shows Texas is at about $130M... Last I saw, I thought Texas was at about $165M or something. They have 1st and DH open (with Gallo & Profar pencilled in right now).
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I love how the link you included shows Texas is at about $130M... Last I saw, I thought Texas was at about $165M or something. They have 1st and DH open (with Gallo & Profar pencilled in right now). Click on "Rangers Tax Tracker" -- that's the CBT payroll.. which shows $171M+.
jerb Verified Member Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 (edited) Rick Westhead Verified account @rwesthead #BlueJays will start 2017 w/ payroll budget of about $165M, up about 14% from starting payroll in 2016: source. Rick Westhead Verified account @rwesthead My math was wrong. Jays opening day payroll of $165M would mark an increase of 20%, not 14%, compared to opening day 2016. Apologies. Edited December 21, 2016 by jerb
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 So we have roughly 30 million left to spend? On what?
BTS Community Moderator Posted December 21, 2016 Author Posted December 21, 2016 Is that for the 25-man, or for the 40-man + all of the other costs that count towards the luxury tax?
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Is that for the 25-man, or for the 40-man + all of the other costs that count towards the luxury tax? Yes
BTS Community Moderator Posted December 21, 2016 Author Posted December 21, 2016 Yes Are you trolling me?
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Well if selling out every game and getting to the ALCS back to back years doesn't increase payroll, I don't know what would.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Well if selling out every game and getting to the ALCS back to back years doesn't increase payroll, I don't know what would. IMO that would be like a farmer going out and buying a bunch of brand new equipment after a record year. It's a pretty short-sighted business approach. I expect a mild increase in payroll, but I don't think you drive an extra $60M into the team simply because you were success in 2 of the past 20 years.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 IMO that would be like a farmer going out and buying a bunch of brand new equipment after a record year. It's a pretty short-sighted business approach. I expect a mild increase in payroll, but I don't think you drive an extra $60M into the team simply because you were success in 2 of the past 20 years. It's not really an equal analogy, because we can always reduce payroll in subsequent years when attendance drops. We have no large contracts on the books at all.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 IMO that would be like a farmer going out and buying a bunch of brand new equipment after a record year. It's a pretty short-sighted business approach. I expect a mild increase in payroll, but I don't think you drive an extra $60M into the team simply because you were success in 2 of the past 20 years. No. But he might go out and spend a little bit more on some better seeds to try and yield a bigger better crop next year.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 It's not really an equal analogy, because we can always reduce payroll in subsequent years when attendance drops. We have no large contracts on the books at all. The idea is to have the fans buy into the system to where they show up regardless of perceived success. Dropping salary upon one unsuccessful season just destroys a fanbase (see KC). Showing fans that you can be successful as a mid pack team isn't going to pack the house, but it won't increase expectations. It's tough as I doubt the "smart fanbase" is big enough anywhere to fill a stadium. Nor do they (we) bring an energy to the park.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now