Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Probably the fact that he was fairly recently a very good player, still 28 and employ his hitting coach from when he was really good, plus he was a bit unlucky last year?

 

Type of player that could have a big bounce back year. At worse, he sucks, we waste a bit of money (possibly) and we use Pompey instead. At best, he goes off and hits like he was a couple years ago, gives us somewhat of a replacement gor Bautista or gets us more in trade value next summer than we gave up this summer.

  • Replies 620
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Type of player that could have a big bounce back year. At worse, he sucks, we waste a bit of money (possibly) and we use Pompey instead. At best, he goes off and hits like he was a couple years ago, gives us somewhat of a replacement gor Bautista or gets us more in trade value next summer than we gave up this summer.

 

Yeah, everything points at a cat bounce season, nothing is guaranteed obviously, but it could end up a very shrewd move.

Posted
I would rather see how he looks at the end of this season before negotiating a deal that even approaches that. For one thing, players typically perform better in a contract year. For another thing, he is getting older and this coming season will help predict the next couple of years. Finally, if the jays are stinking it up near the trade deadline we might be able to move him for prospects.
Posted

It seems like Jose wants his AAV to be one of the highest in MLB. Since he's very confident in his ability to play a while I wonder if he would take a short term contract with a higher AAV. Something like 3 years/85 Million.

 

Regardless I think he is going to FA.

Posted
Type of player that could have a big bounce back year. At worse, he sucks, we waste a bit of money (possibly) and we use Pompey instead. At best, he goes off and hits like he was a couple years ago, gives us somewhat of a replacement gor Bautista or gets us more in trade value next summer than we gave up this summer.

 

That's the way I see it. They obviously don't feel 2014-15 is reflective of his talent going forward. In that case, if they feel his bat is fixable, and it won't take much to get him, then that's their reasoning. Potentially a buy low with a team option attached. What it would have cost to get him is the question, and something it looks like we may never find out.

Posted
It seems like Jose wants his AAV to be one of the highest in MLB. Since he's very confident in his ability to play a while I wonder if he would take a short term contract with a higher AAV. Something like 3 years/85 Million.

 

Regardless I think he is going to FA.

 

I'd like to downvote that 3 year offer, thanks.

Posted (edited)
Google "Jose Bautista Training" . There's a ton of stuff out there on him/it.

 

It's crazy how fans care so much about a player's training regimen, but they can't tell you f*** all about the sport the player plays.

Edited by GeorgiaPeach
Posted
That's the way I see it. They obviously don't feel 2014-15 is reflective of his talent going forward. In that case, if they feel his bat is fixable, and it won't take much to get him, then that's their reasoning. Potentially a buy low with a team option attached. What it would have cost to get him is the question, and something it looks like we may never find out.

 

Yes, you should always negotiate the bat and body moving forward, especially at his age. Never previous accolades, unless they're young.

Posted
I don't think the Blue Jays would sign him to that, but perhaps other teams will cough *Boston*

 

It's still outrageous, and Boston isn't a fit.

Posted
It's crazy how fans care so much about a player's training regimen, but they can't tell you f*** all about the sport the player plays.

 

Not really that crazy, or relevant. What is crazy is how pissy you get over the concept that casual bandwagon fans even exist.

Posted

Omg spanky

 

First establish a benchmark for average performance vs clutch performance for the league then compare it to Bautista average vs clutch

 

So while Bautista might be 10% worse clutch vs average he may still be better than a league that is 20% worse clutch vs average which would make him a plus 10

 

In this case looking at just Bautista's numbers is misleading

Posted
Omg spanky

 

First establish a benchmark for average performance vs clutch performance for the league then compare it to Bautista average vs clutch

 

So while Bautista might be 10% worse clutch vs average he may still be better than a league that is 20% worse clutch vs average which would make him a plus 10

 

In this case looking at just Bautista's numbers is misleading

 

DIAF... Please, trip in traffic, walk in front of a streetcar, IDK!

Posted
Omg spanky

 

First establish a benchmark for average performance vs clutch performance for the league then compare it to Bautista average vs clutch

 

So while Bautista might be 10% worse clutch vs average he may still be better than a league that is 20% worse clutch vs average which would make him a plus 10

 

In this case looking at just Bautista's numbers is misleading

 

get to doing it then

Posted
With Ortiz retiring they don't have a DH next year. If you want to move Hanley to DH then you would have 1B open, both of which Bautista could play.

 

Do you look at their 25 to 40 man, ever?

Posted
no one is giving jose 5 150. Irresponsible journalism is the cause of most of this fuss. Jose has a number he wants. He's entitled to wait. There's risk on both ends. If Jose has a great year someone will probably give him 4 100 or 5 110. The Jays will have to decide if they want to match that level of commitment. Jose and Sandoval are polar opposites. Sandoval got big years and dollars because he was young, but he does't take care of his body and his contract isn't a great one. Jose despite being old may very well keep his level of play up and earn his 4 year 90 or 100 or whatever he ends up getting. 39 no good is just the norm. Jose could be the outlier and be 39 and very good, but there's no guarantees in baseball. That's what makes it interesting.
Posted
Omg spanky

 

First establish a benchmark for average performance vs clutch performance for the league then compare it to Bautista average vs clutch

 

So while Bautista might be 10% worse clutch vs average he may still be better than a league that is 20% worse clutch vs average which would make him a plus 10

 

In this case looking at just Bautista's numbers is misleading

Except that the league is the same in clutch and non clutch. The only thing that skews it is better relievers pitching in high leverage.

Posted
Sign me up for one of those competitive offers. Just don't sign with the f***ing Red Sox.
Posted
That's very difficult to believe is there a link

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=np&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=1&season=2015&month=24&season1=2015&ind=0&team=0,ss&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0

 

Low leverage=100 wRC+

Medium leverge = 101 wRC+

High Leverage = 93 wRC+ (better reliever in)

 

Base empty = 96 wRC+ (better pitcher, thats why bases are empty)

Men on = 105 wRC+ (worse pitcher, hence men on base)

Men in scoring = 102 wRC+ (worse pitcher, but sometimes reliever brought in)

 

When adjusting for quality of competition, I'm sure it is all the same.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...