Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Gallardo is useful on the cheap. You guys are hilarious jumping to conclusions that he will be overpaid. Nobody thinks he's a really good pitcher, but he's a useful piece for the back end of your rotation. Say what you want about him but he can pitch, and do so adequately well in the majors. A lot of teams roster players who shouldn't even be pitching in the bigs and Shapiro is trying to avoid that, I'd be all over Gallardo if his price has rightfully so come way down.
  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
With the quality of the Jays defense, they really should target as many GB pitchers as possible. More GB = more outs on batted balls.
Posted

Shapiro pretty much flat out said there's a question whether the Jays have enough resources to complete such a transaction. Meaning there's not enough cash in the piggy bank. That means no Gallardo, Chris Davis, Cespedes, Upton etc. So everyone should stop even entertaining such notions. Position player wise there's no way anything of significance happens. Our 'challenges' as Shapiro puts it is pitching and there is no reason to not take him for his word when he says finding pitching depth (presumably low cost) is the primary focus.

 

Look out for the Jays to explore contracts with the likes of Fister, Latos, Cliff Lee, Rodney, Stammen, Webb, Joe Nathan, Blanton etc. There also always the possibility of the trade route especially for a backup catcher.

Posted
Women only have 1 use really, and it is not talking.

 

EDIT: Just watched the video, she's not all that.

 

http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/48140933.jpg

Posted
http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/48140933.jpg

 

Thanks for making me puke a little in my mouth - at work. Great start to my Friday. FWIW - tight body, but I don't find her that good looking either.

Posted
Thanks for making me puke a little in my mouth - at work. Great start to my Friday. FWIW - tight body, but I don't find her that good looking either.

 

She does have that "don't talk to me because I'm a huge rad feminist" look about her. Bitchiness is kind of a turn on for me, though.

 

Plus, when she opens her mouth, you can't help but find her less attractive. When it comes down to it, I'd definitely PIIHB, though, no question.

Community Moderator
Posted
And this person is head of an entire department at a university:

 

 

I was joking. She brings it up every chance she gets, and it's annoying. Ana suxxxx.

Posted
I was joking. She brings it up every chance she gets, and it's annoying. Ana suxxxx.

 

Hard to tell through text, dummy. You're a huge TYT fanboi so I can't take that s*** as a joke.

 

Watch that video though, it's hilarious.

Community Moderator
Posted
Hard to tell through text, dummy. You're a huge TYT fanboi so I can't take that s*** as a joke.

 

Watch that video though, it's hilarious.

 

I haven't watched a single video since Cenk's Sam Harris clusterf*** a couple months ago.

Posted
After we had the Jays are in talk with Rodney ae acquired Storen

 

If the trend holds true we are about to acquire a very good starting pitcher

 

You think we can convert Dickey into a very good pitcher? I doubt it.

Besides, I like the fact he gives us 200+ innings of ~4 ERA. Hard to replace it.

Posted
I haven't watched a single video since Cenk's Sam Harris clusterf*** a couple months ago.

 

The one where he mocks Harris for complaining that he gets misrepresented, tells his audience he will make every effort to not misrepresent him, and then goes on to lazily misrepresent him?

Community Moderator
Posted
The one where he mocks Harris for complaining that he gets misrepresented, tells his audience he will make every effort to not misrepresent him, and then goes on to lazily misrepresent him?

 

That's the one.

Posted

Dickey is coming off a 3.6 RA9 WAR season, makes 12M, requires only a 1 year commitment, and has no draft pick tied to him.

 

Gallardo is coming off a 2.5 WAR season, just declined 15.8M, requires at least 2-3 years, and has a draft pick tied to him.

 

I don't see any scenario where Gallardo over Dickey makes any sense, unless you think that the Dickey return package would outweigh the draft pick and any value difference.

 

***Used different WARs since I think each represents their respective pitcher better.

Posted
I would like to have Gallardo on the team but only if we move Dickey.

 

If we can move Dickey for a decent prospect and bullpen arm then sign Gallardo I am all for it.

 

Signing Gallardo would cost us a first round pick. I doubt selling on Dickey would get us first round talent. You're already at a loss.

Posted
I would like to have Gallardo on the team but only if we move Dickey.

 

If we can move Dickey for a decent prospect and bullpen arm then sign Gallardo I am all for it.

 

Taking Gallardo only makes sense if you keep the same starters you have now.

Posted
Taking Gallardo only makes sense if you keep the same starters you have now.

 

this is how i see it also

 

Stro, Dick, Gallardo, Estrada, Happ

 

Chavez swingman

 

Hutch and Sanchez depth in Buffalo

Posted
Signing Gallardo would cost us a first round pick. I doubt selling on Dickey would get us first round talent. You're already at a loss.

 

I thought it would be a 7th round pick?

Posted
Subbing Gallardo for Dickey and losing a pick in the process would be terrible. There's no way Dickey will be able to fetch the equivalent of a first round pick in a trade, and Gallardo over Dickey is an insignificant roster change. Makes no sense.
Posted
Dickey is coming off a 3.6 RA9 WAR season, makes 12M, requires only a 1 year commitment, and has no draft pick tied to him.

 

Gallardo is coming off a 2.5 WAR season, just declined 15.8M, requires at least 2-3 years, and has a draft pick tied to him.

 

I don't see any scenario where Gallardo over Dickey makes any sense, unless you think that the Dickey return package would outweigh the draft pick and any value difference.

 

***Used different WARs since I think each represents their respective pitcher better.

 

I looked up Gallardo's RA9-WAR for shits and giggles, 4.3. I was actually surprised and expected it much closer to his fWAR.

Posted
Signing Gallardo would cost us a first round pick. I doubt selling on Dickey would get us first round talent. You're already at a loss.

 

Unless your gut says that his aging body and arm are going to continue to dive and it's time to cut bait.

Posted
This may be a move looking at 2017 and beyond. The FA market is thin in pitchers next year, and the Jays also have EE and JB to resign. They may want to solidify the rotation now for the next couple seasons so they have less to worry about in 2017.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...