Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
I was trying to find a body to body comparison, he popped in my head. Not talent to talent I guess.

 

I just don't like the idea of giving up assets for a glass man. An outfielder in his prime age shouldn't have that many injuries.

 

Past injury rate does predict future injury rate to some extent, but I think people drastically overstate that effect.

 

What you see if this type of categorical analysis - talented players like Lawrie and Saunders become "would not acquire" guys because they are "made of glass".

 

That's not an intelligent way of approaching it. If you think Saunders will miss 10% more time than an average LF due to injury, then apply that to his reasonable projections (which already include past playing time and this injury risk, btw), adjust his value, and make a rational decision.

 

2.0 WAR in 120 GP is better than 1.5 WAR in 162 GP (unless your backup OF is much worse than replacement level).

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Would anyone be willing to entertain going after both Ackley and Saunders at the cost of…. Jose?

 

Lets say you get Ackley and Saunders. You still need more value back to justify dealing Jose, so what if you add another piece like Iwakuma? You get back a front of the rotation starter on a 1 year deal while filling two needs while being able to still re-sign Melky for LF.

 

Reyes? Sure i'd do that in a heartbeat. Bautista? No, you'd have to be f***ing mental to make that trade.

Posted
Past injury rate does predict future injury rate to some extent, but I think people drastically overstate that effect.

 

What you see if this type of categorical analysis - talented players like Lawrie and Saunders become "would not acquire" guys because they are "made of glass".

 

That's not an intelligent way of approaching it. If you think Saunders will miss 10% more time than an average LF due to injury, then apply that to his reasonable projections (which already include past playing time and this injury risk, btw), adjust his value, and make a rational decision.

 

2.0 WAR in 120 GP is better than 1.5 WAR in 162 GP (unless your backup OF is much worse than replacement level).

 

 

Well since Steamer suggests he's going to make the most plate appearances of his professional career after a dismal attempt at staying healthy, then I don't think it takes injuries in to that much of consideration. I'm not discounting Saunders ability but the hassle of constantly replacing him could be painstaking, even if we say just stick Pillar or Dirks there in between. If this however is the difference of being able to acquire a front of the rotation arm I'm all for it.

Posted
market now set for Melky. Something less than $14.25m AAV

 

Melky: so Alex, about that deal we had two weeks ago..

AA: what deal?

Community Moderator
Posted
Melky is worth more than Cruz. If Cruz gets 4/$57, Melky should get about that + a year. Not the he necessarily will...
Posted
Reyes? Sure i'd do that in a heartbeat. Bautista? No, you'd have to be f***ing mental to make that trade.

 

According to Steamer 2015 projections, you acquire 7.4 WAR for 5.4 from Bautista.

Community Moderator
Posted
According to Steamer 2015 projections, you acquire 7.4 WAR for 5.4 from Bautista.

 

Not really though, when you consider the incumbents.

 

Ackley ~2 = Travis ~2 (0)

Kuma ~3 > Happ ~1.5 (+1.5)

Bautista ~5.5 > Saunders ~2.5 (-3)

 

Team trades a star and gets worse.

Posted
Not to mention that Jose is a year removed from 2 wrist injuries. Wouldn't it make sense to hedge your bets by spreading the injury risk out among 3 players instead of relying on 1 to stay healthy as a 34 year old?
Posted

Saunders would be a huge upgrade in left but I don't see how we match up with the Mariners. They would need a right fielder.

Can AA pull off another 3 team trade involving Cincy,s Bruce.

Posted
Saunders would be a huge upgrade in left but I don't see how we match up with the Mariners. They would need a right fielder.

Can AA pull off another 3 team trade involving Cincy,s Bruce.

 

M's need some pitching depth as well.

 

Could see Dickey/Happ and maybe even Estrada being used in some sort of trade for Saunders .....

Posted
Not to mention that Jose is a year removed from 2 wrist injuries. Wouldn't it make sense to hedge your bets by spreading the injury risk out among 3 players instead of relying on 1 to stay healthy as a 34 year old?

 

Let's give up a premier player for two mediocre ones because WAR is the same

Posted
Not really though, when you consider the incumbents.

 

Ackley ~2 = Travis ~2 (0)

Kuma ~3 > Happ ~1.5 (+1.5)

Bautista ~5.5 > Saunders ~2.5 (-3)

 

Team trades a star and gets worse.

 

Bautista is the heart of this team

Posted
Lol Morosi says they need another OF?

 

 

Morosi is the worst baseball writer out there IMO. I had to stop following him because his tweets are so incredibly annoying.

Posted
Again you can't throw our castaways or spare parts in every trade and expect something back of value

 

but its JOSE FREAKIN REYES

Posted
How close? To seattle Happ,Navarro and Reyes! Plus 10-15 mill

 

For Saunders, Ackley and ss chris Taylor.

 

Adds only 17 mill -12 mill to thier payroll and saves us the same ! :)

 

Not even remotely.

Posted
Not even remotely.

 

Care to expand or explain your stance?

Reyes is upgrade to thier lineup! Happ might be a above average 5th starter in that big ass hard to hit home runs park!

Navarro is a good back up catcher and could DH as well for them!

 

If we drop ackley? Or Dangle a ousana,Castro better?

Posted
How close? To seattle Happ,Navarro and Reyes! Plus 10-15 mill

 

For Saunders, Ackley and ss chris Taylor.

 

Adds only 17 mill -12 mill to thier payroll and saves us the same ! :)

 

chris Taylor suxxx brotha

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Care to expand or explain your stance?

Reyes is upgrade to thier lineup! Happ might be a above average 5th starter in that big ass hard to hit home runs park!

Navarro is a good back up catcher and could DH as well for them!

 

If we drop ackley? Or Dangle a ousana,Castro better?

 

You.

Cannot.

Give.

s***.

And.

Get.

Quality.

 

This has been said at least 10+ times. "Might be an above average 5th starter" "Good backup catcher" s***. 22M average shortstop s***. You're peddling s***.

Posted
Care to expand or explain your stance?

Reyes is upgrade to thier lineup! Happ might be a above average 5th starter in that big ass hard to hit home runs park!

Navarro is a good back up catcher and could DH as well for them!

 

If we drop ackley? Or Dangle a ousana,Castro better?

 

It doesn't really make sense for either team. Happ is probably a 5th starter for them. Why would they want to pay Navarro 5 mil to be the back up? Why would the Jays want to pay Reyes 15 million to be SEA's SS, and replace him with Chris Taylor?

 

Edit: exactly what GD and everyone else said many of times. If a trade doesn't create dialogue, it's likely not fair.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...