Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

GDT(1/3): Minnesota Twins @ Toronto Blue Jays - Nolasco vs. Dickey - 7:07 PM ET

fatcowxlive

By fatcowxlive
in Toronto Blue Jays Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

eastcoastjaysfan Dunedin Blue Jays

eastcoastjaysfan

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
It's not review-able...

 

Hit By Pitch. Those plays for which there is a possibility that a pitched ball touches a batter, or his clothing. See, e.g., Rules 5.09(a) and 6.08(B). Any doubt as to whether a pitched ball hit the bat (as opposed to the batter or his clothing) should be resolved by the Home Plate Umpire at that moment as hitting the bat and not the batter, and the Umpire should declare a fair or foul ball under the circumstances. Notwithstanding the foregoing, whether the ball was in the strike zone when it touched the batter, and whether the batter made any attempt to avoid being touched by the ball, shall not be reviewable. See Rule 6.08(B).

 

Someone should probably tell this to Buck.

Deadpool Buffalo Bisons

Deadpool

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Also, way to bail Dickey out and leave him with respectable "traditional" stats! I love you in the most unnatural ways, McGowan.
Chappy Dunedin Blue Jays

Chappy

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted
Honestly though, Dickey got screwed that inning. I'm not going to s*** on him for a BS call.
Abomination Buffalo Bisons

Abomination

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
It's not review-able...

 

Hit By Pitch. Those plays for which there is a possibility that a pitched ball touches a batter, or his clothing. See, e.g., Rules 5.09(a) and 6.08(B). Any doubt as to whether a pitched ball hit the bat (as opposed to the batter or his clothing) should be resolved by the Home Plate Umpire at that moment as hitting the bat and not the batter, and the Umpire should declare a fair or foul ball under the circumstances. Notwithstanding the foregoing, whether the ball was in the strike zone when it touched the batter, and whether the batter made any attempt to avoid being touched by the ball, shall not be reviewable. See Rule 6.08(B).

 

Hmmm. Gibbons 1, forum 0 lol

o2cui2i Vancouver Canadians

o2cui2i

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-d39l9MxDmiU/UYxHqGwOL_I/AAAAAAAAKn8/y_1OofnCapA/s200/leslie-nielsen-umpire.jpg
Dylan All-Star

Dylan

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
It's not review-able...

 

Hit By Pitch. Those plays for which there is a possibility that a pitched ball touches a batter, or his clothing. See, e.g., Rules 5.09(a) and 6.08(B). Any doubt as to whether a pitched ball hit the bat (as opposed to the batter or his clothing) should be resolved by the Home Plate Umpire at that moment as hitting the bat and not the batter, and the Umpire should declare a fair or foul ball under the circumstances. Notwithstanding the foregoing, whether the ball was in the strike zone when it touched the batter, and whether the batter made any attempt to avoid being touched by the ball, shall not be reviewable. See Rule 6.08(B).

 

Rather dumb that you can't review that because it's pretty obvious to determine from highlights

G-Snarls Cooperstown

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted
Just desserts! Arcia you f***ing scumbag.

 

Hopefully Lawrie kicked him in the nuts while making that DP play turn

Corporal Valdal First Round Pick

Corporal Valdal

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I love that Lawrie can just shift between second and third without issue.

 

Is it just me but i love him as a 2B you can tell he played there in the minors so much more comfortable there

Iluvbjs College Ball

Iluvbjs

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I'm not so sure you can review that. I'm not going on buck's word. You can challenge whether or not a ball actually hit a batter, but I'm not sure the judgement call of determining whether or not a player deliberately took one can be reviewed.

 

Yes, you can, it's much like fan interference, it's a judgment call on whether buddy made an effort to get out of the way. It's rather simple really.

 

On the Dickey note, it's the same thing every time out, he gets through 5 and comes out and implodes. As soon as he gave up that hit, I knew he was going to f*** the inning up. At least this hick for a manager is getting better at recognizing it. 3 starts back, he would've let dickey give up all 3 of those runs and then come out and even start another inning. Our bullpen has cost us a few this year and that happens, but Gibby has cost us at least 3 and you just can't have a manger who consistenly lapses in judgment and who doesn't recognize situations when they repeat themselves.

Candy Maldonado FCL Blue Jays

Candy Maldonado

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Yes, you can, it's much like fan interference, it's a judgment call on whether buddy made an effort to get out of the way. It's rather simple really.

 

On the Dickey note, it's the same thing every time out, he gets through 5 and comes out and implodes. As soon as he gave up that hit, I knew he was going to f*** the inning up. At least this hick for a manager is getting better at recognizing it. 3 starts back, he would've let dickey give up all 3 of those runs and then come out and even start another inning. Our bullpen has cost us a few this year and that happens, but Gibby has cost us at least 3 and you just can't have a manger who consistenly lapses in judgment and who doesn't recognize situations when they repeat themselves.

 

see above genius

kgm1 First Round Pick

kgm1

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I don't understand the hate for Dickey. That was a ******** inning and he pitched around Morales. He gets lots of ground ball double plays but good job Dusty
shortstop College Ball

shortstop

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

from mlb, http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/official_rules/replay_review.jsp, part V, G...

 

Hit By Pitch. Those plays for which there is a possibility that a pitched ball touches a batter, or his clothing. See, e.g., Rules 5.09(a) and 6.08(B). Any doubt as to whether a pitched ball hit the bat (as opposed to the batter or his clothing) should be resolved by the Home Plate Umpire at that moment as hitting the bat and not the batter, and the Umpire should declare a fair or foul ball under the circumstances. Notwithstanding the foregoing, whether the ball was in the strike zone when it touched the batter, and whether the batter made any attempt to avoid being touched by the ball, shall not be reviewable. See Rule 6.08(B).

G-Snarls Cooperstown

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted
Hmmm. Gibbons 1, forum 0 lol

 

That must have been what the ump was telling him

 

s***. we owe Gibby an apology. Play not reviewable.

 

But Buck and Tabby were dead wrong and misled us.

Orgfiller All-Star

Orgfiller

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
McGowan has been f***ing nails out of the pen!

 

God damn! What a huge boost he's been.

 

Even though we might have given him a bit too much rope in the rotation he's been handled perfectly this year and pleased everyone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    20,997
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    Sarahh
    Newest Member
    Sarahh
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...